GiselleBeyince Posted January 28 Posted January 28 5 hours ago, anastaciabby said: Dear Lord some of you should take politics as seriously as this garbage, you've been going off for weeks. ...and? Luckily for me, I can walk and chew gum at the same time. The irony of your irrelevant ass post. 2
Popular Post Hey Babes Posted January 28 Popular Post Posted January 28 (edited) 19 hours ago, Acuminatus said: What a mess Blake listening to this audio in hiding from Ryan inside her closet trying to hold multiple orgasms with her vaginal moisturising suppositories vibrating: Edited January 28 by Hey Babes 16
leonbotstein Posted January 28 Posted January 28 1 hour ago, Fama said: Ok leonBOTstein Calling someone a bot is the weakest nonresponse possible 1
leonbotstein Posted January 28 Posted January 28 7 hours ago, Fama said: Blake and Justin's project started well, but tensions grew as Justin strayed from the script. WHAT? NO ONE IS EVEN CONTENDING THAT? Blake became increasingly uncomfortable, particularly during a pivotal birth scene. AGAIN, WHAT? THAT IS NOT EVEN HER NARRATIVE. Instead of the professional actor she expected, her co-star was a billionaire friend of Justin, and the set was chaotic, with people walking in and out during filming. THIS PERSON IS CONFLATING LIKE THREE UNTRUE THINGS. THEY ARE VERY CONFUSED. Despite raising concerns, Justin ignored her boundaries. THIS IS GRAMMATICALLY AS WELL AS FACTUALLY WRONG. Throughout filming, she repeatedly voiced her discomfort to the production company and distributor. THIS IS NOT TRUE LOL. Ultimately, external mediation was needed to establish terms under which the project could continue, allowing the film to be completed. THIS IS ALSO NOT TRUE. COVID HAPPENED. THERE WAS NO EXTERNAL MEDIATOR? THE COUPLE TOOK ADVANTAGE OF THE GAP. THEY KNEEPCAPPED THE PRODUCTION COMPANY INTO AGREEING TO AMBIGUOUS/POINTLESS 'RULES' IN ORDER FOR FILMING TO RESUME POST-COVID, SO THAT THEY COULD LATER POINT TO IT AS "EVIDENCE." However, Justin, worried that Blake might sue him, hired Johnny Depp's PR team to initiate a smear campaign against her. THERE WAS NO SMEAR CAMPAIGN. BLAKE SAID AND DID A BUNCH OF HORRENDOUS THINGS, AND PEOPLE NOTICED. That campaign continues to this day AGAIN...NO IT DOESN'T? THE EXTENT OF THE "EVIDENCE" IS THAT PR PEOPLE JOKED ONCE OR TWICE IN A GROUPCHAT THAT THEY WERE 'SO GOOD AT THEIR JOB'. and has created an echo chamber of misinformation, as evidenced in this topic. I'm not engaging with this poster, who is very limited and confused, but just fact-checking them for everyone else's sake. 3
Blade Runner Posted January 28 Posted January 28 People on this thread obsessed with defending this man and literally supporting a creep. Y'all just hate women like the rest of social media/world. Ew. 1 1 8
bjorn Posted January 28 Posted January 28 1 hour ago, Blade Runner said: People on this thread obsessed with defending this man and literally supporting a creep. Y'all just hate women like the rest of social media/world. Ew. 3 1 1
GucciBang Posted January 28 Posted January 28 1 hour ago, Blade Runner said: People on this thread obsessed with defending this man and literally supporting a creep. Y'all just hate women like the rest of social media/world. Ew. Can we not! I was literally on Blake's side before Justin's suit. Blake's fans can't argue with the evidence so they stick with 'y'all hate all women narrative' when I personally is an actual victim of sh 7 1
Blade Runner Posted January 28 Posted January 28 4 minutes ago, GucciBang said: Can we not! I was literally on Blake's side before Justin's suit. Blake's fans can't argue with the evidence so they stick with 'y'all hate all women narrative' when I personally is an actual victim of sh 5 minutes ago, bjorn said: 1 6
Blade Runner Posted January 28 Posted January 28 Hope his career gets destroyed even more. He's no Johnny Depp and his lying, manipulative, abuser ass will pay. Enjoy. 2 11
Popular Post stoopidjenna Posted January 29 Popular Post Posted January 29 12 minutes ago, Blade Runner said: Hope his career gets destroyed even more. He's no Johnny Depp and his lying, manipulative, abuser ass will pay. Enjoy. Are you talking about Ryan 4 20
leonbotstein Posted January 29 Posted January 29 A tiny thing no one is talking about. Ryan points to the ugly dog in Deadpool and says "You let this little flirt out of your sight for one second, and she starts shopping for a new papa." Same odd language he uses in the creepy IEWU interview with Sklenar ("I'd love to be your new dad"). Then, BL posted a photo of him holding the dog on IG (I'm quoting from a Yahoo article): "SOS He's trying to get me pregnant again. Put the dog that you find adorable in spite of societal k9 expectations away and take off the damn teal suit! Rude."
Blade Runner Posted January 29 Posted January 29 4 hours ago, stoopidjenna said: Are you talking about Ryan No. I'm talking about Justin Baldoni. A lying, scheming piece of ****. 2 4
bjorn Posted January 29 Posted January 29 If you copy paste the image address in the NYT article it says they created the image on 16. Dec 24. Blake filed her complaint with California Civil Rights Department on Dec. 20. Dec. 21. NYT publishes their article. The other image in the article says "smear-baldoni" in the address. So they knew Blake was gonna file the complaint and planned accordingly to publish the article a day after, to really hurt JB's career. 4
RiseAndShine Posted January 29 Posted January 29 (edited) Not Blake saying Justin leaked her complaint to the press when, according to the metadata, she had been working with the NYT for at least 9 days before the article dropped and 8 days before the actual complaint was filed. Why does she continue to lie about things that can easily be disproven? It's quite disturbing the lengths she will go to to salvage her tarnished reputation. Edited January 29 by RiseAndShine 6
BnPac Posted January 29 Posted January 29 On 1/21/2025 at 9:09 PM, Trent W said: I said it a few pages ago, Lying about sexual harassment is absolutely demonic, As a woman myself, I couldn't agree harder. You ruin everything for victims when you do that. That said, I know nothing about this case but if she did lie about it in, she needs to face severe repercussions and if she told the truth, I hope justice is served. 6
SupremeGoddess Posted January 29 Posted January 29 9 hours ago, GucciBang said: Can we not! I was literally on Blake's side before Justin's suit. Blake's fans can't argue with the evidence so they stick with 'y'all hate all women narrative' when I personally is an actual victim of sh blake lively stans literally making it even harder for people to believe women when they pull that narrative out of their ass to support an actual woman who herself doesn't even believe in women lol ok harvey weinstein did nothing wrong one big series wonder actress stans, go off. 3
Popular Post Riverbank Posted January 29 Popular Post Posted January 29 Some of y'all will really see a blonde woman with blue eyes and the two braincells inside your head immediately start honking "MiSoGyNy11!!" at any valid criticism 12 1 2
KatyPrismSpirit Posted January 29 Posted January 29 9 hours ago, Blade Runner said: No. I'm talking about Justin Baldoni. A lying, scheming piece of ****. You are so foolish. Do your research and you will discover he did nothing wrong. Its Ryan Reynolds fault. 2
Hey Babes Posted January 29 Posted January 29 Molly is spot on here. She has been saying that Ryan is behind all of this since day one. 2
bjorn Posted January 29 Posted January 29 (edited) Quote Taylor Swift is taking a step back from her friendship with Blake Lively after feeling like she was used as an 'intimidation tactic' by the actress in a lawsuit she never wanted to be embroiled in. The singer, 35, was dragged into the explosive legal feud between Lively, 37, and Justin Baldoni, 41, when he claimed his costar used Swift to intimidate him at a meeting with her husband Ryan Reynolds about edits she had made to a rooftop scene in their film, It Ends with Us. In his $400 million lawsuit, filed earlier this month, Baldoni said Swift showed up and made him feel like he 'needed to comply with Blake's direction for the script'. Lively later appeared to threaten Baldoni by comparing herself to Game of Thrones character Khaleesi in a series of text messages in which she referred to Reynolds, 48, and her best friend as her 'dragons'. The 'uncool and unnecessary' description was reportedly the final straw for Swift who had never planned to be at the meeting, but arrived at Lively's New York penthouse to find it was still ongoing. 'For the time being she is taking a step back from Blake because she doesn't want to get tangled in this more than she already has – which is far more than she ever needed to be,' an insider told DailyMail.com. How embarrassing for Blake... (and yes i know it's dailymail but still) Edited January 29 by bjorn 2
bjorn Posted January 29 Posted January 29 I'm so sorry Khalessi... how the f can someone defend this? so insanely manipulative 3
RiseAndShine Posted January 29 Posted January 29 (edited) On 1/28/2025 at 8:31 AM, GiselleBeyince said: I find it absolutely sensational that Blake supporters on Twitter and Reddit (popculturechat/Fauxmoi) find this to be the smoking gun for her case. Proving that he is a creepy for leaving voice note at 2AM mentioning "wanting all of her" and her "baby on her boob". Mind you, this is in response to her telling him that directors never treat her well or take her ideas/notes seriously. They only see her as an actress and not a creative partner. This is AFTER she texted him the novels and essays about Khaleesi/dragons and basically using Ryan/Taylor to threatened him in their penthouse earlier re: using the rewritten scene, he had previously declined. IF this does go to court, she's definitely gonna lose. I've realized people only side with her when their interactions are out of context. The cherry picked NYT messages, the excerpt from the dancing scene, and the birth scene description from her original complaint. Analyzing this situation within full context (as much as we can get prior to trial) plants people firmly on his side. We have her "stans" on X rejoicing thinking he sent this unwelcomed is something. It proves they haven't read hers nor his complaints. They would KNOW that he sent this in response to her texts at 1AM after their meeting and that he sounds manipulative as he IS actively trying to placate her and feeding into her ego and delusions. He is being manipulative because he is fearful of her power and influence, her dragons (Renolds/Swift), and wants to keep the peace. To the point of excessive, effasive groveling. To the point of ridiculousness while mirroring her word salad speech/text structure. Her supporters say the people that believe him are dumb but it seems to be only they/us that realize the context, undertones, and background because we READ all the details and fineprint. They haven't read **** and severely lack critical thinking skills. They talk about him mentioning her baby on her breast but she had just given birth in February 2023, she invited him over her house multiple times, she was comfortable enough to nurse her baby infront of him, had him play wi/ her newborn, even taking pictures. This happened during pre-production. Before this audio, she sent him a text joking about inserting suppositories inside her ***!na! Why would she be so confortable sharing that w/ him? Do her supporters not know we have these screenshots on file atp? Like, wtf is this text? I've been trying to read through this thread and finally got around to listening to his voice note just now. There is absolutely nothing manipulative or creepy about this voice note. How did people even come to that conclusion? If anything, he sounds like a total pushover. He's blowing so much smoke up her a$$, even as she's actively trying to rewrite his script and movie. He was actually being too nice, placating her, validating her delusions and apologizing for her mistreatment at the hands of other filmmakers she worked with. She would have never tried to bulldoze a Martin Scorsese or Quentin Tarantino film. She and her rat-faced husband should have bought the rights to another book if she wanted complete control over the film. Edited January 29 by RiseAndShine 10
Recommended Posts