Rep2000 Posted January 17 Posted January 17 (edited) 10 hours ago, GiselleBeyince said: Bryan Freedman is also representing FKA Twigs in her sexual assault lawsuit against Shia Labeouf. He has also represented multiple female rape victims. Blake Lively's publicist, Leslie Sloane, started her career working with Harvey Weinstein. Destroying and burying the careers of his rape victims for nearly two decades. Harvey literally funded Vision PR. Blake also supported Woody Allen against his daughter, the one that he molested as a child. Blake's lawyer is also Drake and Sony's attorneys. Two horrible entities. ****. Even Nathan, Johnny/Baldoni's crisis manager, repped the woman that recorded the George Floyd arrest/murder. Please put the guilty by association label to rest. I have no idea why this is a hill Blake supporters want to die on when she had a plantation wedding and even had a deal with a clothing brand famous for their slave/Antebellum collection for 'It Ends with Us'. Your girl is a horrible human. Sure, but don't act surprised when Baldoni starts to slide down that fake-liberal-turns-right-wing-pundit pipeline like Russell Brand did. After reading his whole passive aggressive lawsuits where he paint not only Blake but another woman as "crazy" in his lawsuit, do you really think he's true "male feminist"? His/his team actions consistently challenge that idea to me, and after reading his suit, it reaffirms why so many right wing nutjobs are sitting on his side of the table. He chose to go to Megyn knowing what her audience are. He chose to go after NYT and Disney/Marvel based on weak suspicion and continued to make himself look guilty/chasing clouts. Your "male feminist" boy is as fake as it comes. Edit: I'm gonna make predictions right now. And you all just have to keep your eyes open and see. His team is gonna go down the Depp route: constantly leaking voicenotes out to the media, before and during the trial. He is gonna push for a televised trial. And everything the Tiktok crowd are saying is gonna end up on his lawsuit. There are going to be a millions edits about her "guilty"/mean girl behavior during the trial trending on social media during the trial ala Amber Heard. This is DARVO to a t. Edited January 17 by Rep2000 4 1 3 2
Acuminatus Posted January 17 Posted January 17 (edited) It's interesting to see how different the response is in Reddit - seems to be highly in Blake Lively's favour (at least on this sub) whereas in other places they seem to be on Baldoni's side. I wonder which side will win out the PR war after all this. Maybe it will just be a case where both sides lose. Edited January 17 by Acuminatus 1
MattieB Posted January 18 Posted January 18 25 minutes ago, Acuminatus said: It's interesting to see how different the response is in Reddit - seems to be highly in Blake Lively's favour (at least on this sub) whereas in other places they seem to be on Baldoni's side. I wonder which side will win out the PR war after all this. Maybe it will just be a case where both sides lose. Places like Reddit, ontd, and to an extent Twitter are psycho-babble echo chambers that refuse to use critical thinking so that they can virtue signal at the highest possible rate. It's #believeallwomen NO MATTER WHAT, no grey areas, nothing. It's an absolute mindset that all men are evil. These are the crowds Ryan and Blake were relying on to propel their lies simply by attaching #SexualAbuse to the complaint, I hate to say it but they read them up and used it against them their only mistake was thinking the rest of the internet was just like those sites, they greatly miscalculated 6 5 1
GiselleBeyince Posted January 18 Posted January 18 55 minutes ago, Acuminatus said: It's interesting to see how different the response is in Reddit - seems to be highly in Blake Lively's favour (at least on this sub) whereas in other places they seem to be on Baldoni's side. I wonder which side will win out the PR war after all this. Maybe it will just be a case where both sides lose. Echo chamber and liberal white women. I've also noticed how liberal WOC are super critical of Blake/her claims. I've seen that contrast in the comments on ONTD, Popculture, and Fauxmoi subreddits. TikTok seems to have the widest demographic of women who are anti-Blake. She is also supported by a lot of the Feminist X accounts, even though stopped tweeting about her after his first lawsuit. Her support comes from a very specific racial demographic that share the same political leanings. We can all infer why. But I have a bit more contribute to that answer, however, I'll leave it alone. Lol 8 4
TouchinFree Posted January 18 Posted January 18 22 hours ago, GiselleBeyince said: Alright so I am finishing up reading all of his lawsuit. I think everyone should focus on the sexual assault allegations in both suits. Re: Justin lawsuit is super long because he isn't only using it as a grounds for defamation. It includes contractual breaches (her taking over the film), an aspect the general public doesn't care about. The meat of matter for most people is the assault claims levied in Blake's complaint. He responds to a lot of her points on pages 49-70 of his. For the girlies that don't like to read, so scroll to those pages, open Blake's CRD complaint, and match up the dates and timeline, especially her 17 Point Return to Work Document. This is why myself and others do not believe her. The SAG strike commenced on July 14, 2023. Filming began in May 2023. So, the alleged assault happened over a two month period. Yet, in Justin's new lawsuit, she is texting him casually during the summer after the strikes started. Mind you this is after filming and the assault. Many of the private interactions they had at her penthouse would also be during the time and after that her lawsuit States the assault occurred. The 17 Point Document, stipulating the conditions of her return to set, had an intimacy coordinators clause. One must be available at all times for Ms. Lively. However, there was already one hired by Justin and his production company. The text messages of him scheduling the meeting with her prior to filming proves this. She replied to that text. There are also emails from Blake's lawyers and Wayfarer Studios mention SAG AFTRA, the actor's union, signing off (approval) of said intimacy coordinator. There is also another email of Wayfarer to Blake Lively's lawyer agreeing to and signing of a Nudity Rider that Wayfarer requested to be approved by SAG's intimacy coordinator. This is from May 2023. How can Blake say she requested an intimacy coordinator because she felt unsafe on set and only received one after the 17 Point Document (crafted in November 2023), when there was one already hired and her team agreed by email in May 2023? She also included requesting a Nudity Rider in the 17 Point Document on November 2023, when that was ALREADY a part of her production agreement from Justin's production studio. Again, there are emails in his lawsuit that proves/confirms this. Additionally, Justin's lawsuit responded to each 17 Point mentioned in Blake's lawsuit w/ emails and text messages detailing the process; disputing, defending, and contextualizes her allegations w/ receipts. Whether they are strong enough to disprove her claims, that is up to the courts and the reader. I am begging y'all to read pages 49-70 of his suit. That's the only section that is important re: the sexual assault accusations. That section is his rebuttal. You don't NEED to read everything else unless you're messy and want all the tea about her being a diva and control freak. Go through it with hers and come back here, and share your thoughts. I am thinking Blake and her team are massive unreliable narrators here. This needs to go to trial expeditiously. ETA: Why did Blake request to edit the film with him, privately, in 2024 after filming wrapped after the airing out his abusive ways to her husband, the studio, and others just recently in January 2024? Why be in the stead such an abusive prick? Easy. She liked him, she was attracted to him "i only CARE about you and this movie" . He viewed her as a friend. She hated that. She ran to her husband that KNEW she fansied him. 2 broken egos are quite malicious and evil. And are stronger than 1 broken ego. I dont know how some of you are still here out with the " SUPPORT ALL WOMEN" when you have super cringy , threatening texts like that god damn awful GOT reference text or her denying wanting to attend intimacy sessions over texts when in her interviews she said there was no intimacy expert scheduled. Keep enabling lying women like her only because she's a "woman" and besties with Taylor. When in fact, in court they will look at EVIDENCE and she'll be massively discreditted...... meaning women ( of "lower" social class) who get SA'D on the regular by creeps will have to be QUESTIONED even if evidence are present. In fact, this is THE very reason why actual victims get discreditted. It's just terrible. 1 9 2
Dante Silva Posted January 18 Posted January 18 On 1/17/2025 at 3:11 AM, Rep2000 said: If you read it in its entirety, then surely you can pick up the inconsistency where Baldoni claimed they never saw the 17-point agreement in his NYT lawsuit, yes? But now in this lawsuit, apparently they had found it. Blake's team had previously claimed it was a 30-point agreement, and NOT a 17-point agreement. Justin rightly never admitted to having seen, read, or signed a blown-up agreement with an additional 13 points (the invention and tale of which were most likely put forth and circulated in the media by either Blake's PR or legal team). It is not legally appropriate to conflate an actual agreement with a fictional one. Those 13 additional points Blake's team fictionalized and told tales of in the media - could have meant anything in legal terms, and Justin and his team would likely wonder about the source of the additional 13 points (that he had never signed up to in legal terms) and what specifically those additional press-speculated 13 points actually are. It's important to note there was a power struggle on the movie set, and the production schedule (the itinerary of which had been set out in exacting detail) had been drawn up and had existed for a year prior to the movie going into actual production. Wayfairer is a small and independent movie production company. They had already lost a considerable portion of time from the itinerary of their production schedule due to the writers' strike. They had a large proportion of the movie already shot, featuring Blake, prior to the writer's strike. They desperately needed her back on set to complete production of the movie the moment the writers' strike was officially over. This was in order to mitigate the already inflated movie production costs that had arisen as a direct consequence of lost time from their shooting schedule due to the writers' strike; otherwise, they (Wayfairer) would have been more than happy to recast Margot Robbie or Sydney Sweeney (for example) in the role. Blake knew how much of the movie was already shot and in the can (prior to the writer's strike), and Wayfairer signed an agreement containing 17 points (not 30), simply to get Blake back to work so the rest of production could be completed to mitigate and avoid the movie production costs escalating and going even further over budget - by as little as possible. The lengths you are going to in defense of Blake, simply because she has substituted Selena Gomez for your idol's 'bestie,' are positively pathogenic. 9
Dante Silva Posted January 18 Posted January 18 On 1/17/2025 at 3:11 AM, Rep2000 said: If you read it in its entirety, then surely you can pick up the inconsistency where Baldoni claimed they never saw the 17-point agreement in his NYT lawsuit, yes? But now in this lawsuit, apparently they had found it. Or how familiar the Depp's lawsuit language compares to this one. They are using the same strategy. Yes, this video is bloated and salacious but it does breakdown why Blake is adopting the failed Amber defense mode:
MattieB Posted January 18 Posted January 18 1 hour ago, Dante Silva said: Blake's team had previously claimed it was a 30-point agreement, and NOT a 17-point agreement. Justin rightly never admitted to having seen, read, or signed a blown-up agreement with an additional 13 points (the invention and tale of which were most likely put forth and circulated in the media by either Blake's PR or legal team). It is not legally appropriate to conflate an actual agreement with a fictional one. Those 13 additional points Blake's team fictionalized and told tales of in the media - could have meant anything in legal terms, and Justin and his team would likely wonder about the source of the additional 13 points (that he had never signed up to in legal terms) and what specifically those additional press-speculated 13 points actually are. It's important to note there was a power struggle on the movie set, and the production schedule (the itinerary of which had been set out in exacting detail) had been drawn up and had existed for a year prior to the movie going into actual production. Wayfairer is a small and independent movie production company. They had already lost a considerable portion of time from the itinerary of their production schedule due to the writers' strike. They had a large proportion of the movie already shot, featuring Blake, prior to the writer's strike. They desperately needed her back on set to complete production of the movie the moment the writers' strike was officially over. This was in order to mitigate the already inflated movie production costs that had arisen as a direct consequence of lost time from their shooting schedule due to the writers' strike; otherwise, they (Wayfairer) would have been more than happy to recast Margot Robbie or Sydney Sweeney (for example) in the role. Blake knew how much of the movie was already shot and in the can (prior to the writer's strike), and Wayfairer signed an agreement containing 17 points (not 30), simply to get Blake back to work so the rest of production could be completed to mitigate and avoid the movie production costs escalating and going even further over budget - by as little as possible. The lengths you are going to in defense of Blake, simply because she has substituted Selena Gomez for your idol's 'bestie,' are positively pathogenic. That is what you call a clean scalp. 2 3
Fama Posted January 18 Posted January 18 At first, I didn't understand why he hired a PR crisis manager to launch a smear campaign against Lively. It seemed so extreme. But now, with all these lawsuits, it's clear this is just who he is. I wonder what kind of personality he has. I imagine his conversations with his legal team go something like this: 1
Hey Babes Posted January 18 Posted January 18 (edited) Damn, 5 lawsuits later and sis is still recycling out of context and manipulated screenshots from the first one Edited January 18 by Hey Babes 10
Hey Babes Posted January 18 Posted January 18 (edited) After reading the latest lawsuit, the only women I feel truly sorry for in all of this are these innocent, gorgeously ladies who had no involvement in the situation but were locked in the basement by Blake Lively's security team simply because they happened to be on Baldoni's invitation list. Edited January 18 by Hey Babes 10
Fama Posted January 18 Posted January 18 3 hours ago, Hey Babes said: Damn, 5 lawsuits later and sis is still recycling out of context and manipulated screenshots from the first one The tactic of distraction clearly doesn't work on me.
Elusive Chanteuse Posted January 18 Posted January 18 Her text messages are so long. The one about dragons. 1
DanyelP23 Posted January 18 Posted January 18 The threads on L*pstickAll*y about this whole situation are a kii to read 2
Marla Singer Posted January 18 Posted January 18 Blake thinks she's Khaleesi? Taylor is Khaleesi, she's just a handmaiden. 4
T.O.A.D.S. Posted January 19 Posted January 19 Quote Lively was leaving what she had earlier referred to as "crumbs," a social media strategy she had learned from a close celebrity friend: to give fans just enough to allow them to come to their own conclusions, thereby launching an army of detectives that, on information and belief, Lively hoped would turn against Baldoni. The unfollowing of Baldoni by cast members and even the author of the book, who he had a longstanding relationship with, was done without warning or any communication from them, in stark contrast to the warm praise and appreciation cast members had until that point always showered on him. birds of a feather flock together
GiselleBeyince Posted January 19 Posted January 19 12 hours ago, Hey Babes said: After reading the latest lawsuit, the only women I feel truly sorry for in all of this are these innocent, gorgeously ladies who had no involvement in the situation but were locked in the basement by Blake Lively's security team simply because they happened to be on Baldoni's invitation list. All the Brown people in the basement. Yet, the Swifties and the Lively supporters stay wondering why WOC hate her ass. SMFH 3
spiritboy Posted January 19 Posted January 19 If Blake lied about sexual harrassment, i hope he destroys her to the pits of hell. That's all i can say atm.
IVY Posted January 19 Posted January 19 (edited) The long ass essay she wrote praising herself, and using Taylor Swift giving her the props as a proof that she deserves recognition and praise from everyone else. It's like if the Taylor Swift thinks too high of me, then you should do too. Edited January 19 by IVY 1 6
Hey Babes Posted January 19 Posted January 19 (edited) 3 hours ago, IVY said: This is cringy in so many levels, i CANT Edited January 19 by Hey Babes 1
Gaia Posted January 20 Posted January 20 I'm sorry but Taylor fans up Blake's ass... there's no way you can read those texts and not be embarrassed that Blake is clearly using your girl for connections and clout behind the scenes Taylor is nothing more than a "dragon" for Miss Maam that she can use to intimidate people behind the scene because people know she has an army of rabid fans. but yeah, keep defending this obvious liar with your whole being 5 1
Froufrou Posted January 20 Posted January 20 On 1/18/2025 at 6:18 AM, Rep2000 said: Sure, but don't act surprised when Baldoni starts to slide down that fake-liberal-turns-right-wing-pundit pipeline like Russell Brand did. After reading his whole passive aggressive lawsuits where he paint not only Blake but another woman as "crazy" in his lawsuit, do you really think he's true "male feminist"? His/his team actions consistently challenge that idea to me, and after reading his suit, it reaffirms why so many right wing nutjobs are sitting on his side of the table. He chose to go to Megyn knowing what her audience are. He chose to go after NYT and Disney/Marvel based on weak suspicion and continued to make himself look guilty/chasing clouts. Your "male feminist" boy is as fake as it comes. Edit: I'm gonna make predictions right now. And you all just have to keep your eyes open and see. His team is gonna go down the Depp route: constantly leaking voicenotes out to the media, before and during the trial. He is gonna push for a televised trial. And everything the Tiktok crowd are saying is gonna end up on his lawsuit. There are going to be a millions edits about her "guilty"/mean girl behavior during the trial trending on social media during the trial ala Amber Heard. This is DARVO to a t. but blake lively is no amber heard, she's way above justin power.
Popboi. Posted January 21 Posted January 21 On 1/19/2025 at 3:44 AM, GiselleBeyince said: All the Brown people in the basement. Yet, the Swifties and the Lively supporters stay wondering why WOC hate her ass. SMFH 3
Gaia Posted January 21 Posted January 21 (edited) 58 minutes ago, Popboi. said: When 95% of Blake's supporters are Swifties, why do you think Taylor would not get mentioned Edited January 21 by Gaia 2 1
Recommended Posts