camilacabelloslaps Posted January 16 Posted January 16 5 hours ago, Vermillion said: @camilacabelloslaps Not only this, but this gaslighting that criticizing Blake automatically translates to sweeping support for Justin is transparent bull****. Go worry about that attempted racism reformation and apology from your AVI that no one bought outside her stanbase. I'm not worried about anything lol, just pointing out how unnecessarily rude and immature a lot of people on this website are. for example you replying and ending with an attempt to drag Camila for her preteen tumblr just proves how unnecessary and crazy rude a lot of people on this website are and quick to root for someone's downfall… Blake provided some decent receipts but sure the reasonable reaction is to attack me liking Camila Cabello and quote a post that assumes everything is about supporting white women 🤡 Thank god for the ignore list
Rep2000 Posted January 16 Posted January 16 2 hours ago, IVY said: The way she is talking to him doesn't sound like this is a man who has sexually abused her and made her life a living hell like she is claiming. Check the date. This was still very early during filming. They filmed this film since late March to even 2024.
Rep2000 Posted January 17 Posted January 17 Reading the Baldoni's lawsuit right now. Gosh, it's so obnoxious of his team trying to go on several irrelevant rants to be the victim as much as possible. For example, he even uses the wildfire disaster to try to gain sympathy points: Quote Lively even went so far as to serve her lawsuit on the Los Angeles-based defendants as they evacuated their homes in the midst of devastating fires engulfing their city. On a day when Defendants were gathering their kids and pets, preparing "go bags" and monitoring evacuation orders while fearing for their homes, Lively—from the safety of her penthouse in New York— deployed process servers in the midst of these troubling times. Blake started her process during Xmas ffs.
Rep2000 Posted January 17 Posted January 17 Also, what's with this gossip-y "her megacelebrity friend" mentions? If you read between the lines, it's clear who he is trying to single out among Blake's friends. But this angle is like specifically designed for gossip tabloids to pick up, rather than being an actual legal argument. If this "megacelebrity friend" did pressure him to accept the changes, then actually name them. His team is truly picking everything Tiktok is saying and turning them into a lawsuit omg.
Rep2000 Posted January 17 Posted January 17 (edited) Very interesting here. In this lawsuit, Baldoni's team finally acknowledge that they did receive Blake's 17-point of non-negotiable condition. However, in his previous lawsuit to NYT, his team denied to ever see nor agree to this list. *So what's the truth here.gif* I'm gonna finish this later. But it's very clear this would lead to a courtroom battle where they would have to show more evidences. Blake's team would have more discovery to work with now, since he countersues her. So obviously more evidences would start showing up after this. This lawsuit is gonna take *years*. And it's gonna be very exhausting. Edit: a word. Edited January 17 by Rep2000
Trent W Posted January 17 Posted January 17 37 minutes ago, Rep2000 said: Also, what's with this gossip-y "her megacelebrity friend" mentions? If you read between the lines, it's clear who he is trying to single out among Blake's friends. But this angle is like specifically designed for gossip tabloids to pick up, rather than being an actual legal argument. If this "megacelebrity friend" did pressure him to accept the changes, then actually name them. His team is truly picking everything Tiktok is saying and turning them into a lawsuit omg. No one in tik tok is making up stuff, he has everything well documented they are just catching up with the situation. Maybe the nicepool thing might be the only thing I could think off that tik tok discovered and his team catch up with that. on another topic I was on her side through the first round of drags un August, back then the hate seemed exaggerated She lost me at the sexual harrassment claim ITs UNFORGIVABLE to do that to save your image, I would say even worse for women in general and the victim which is Justin(proven so far). 3
Trent W Posted January 17 Posted January 17 (edited) Also Swifies better back off, this woman is about to go down, the more swifties do online the more people are going to associate Taylor with her and she's already getting dragged Blake Lively's name is poison right now, Ryan seems like he's going down too big time I say this because the very few people I've seen online on Blake's side are Taylor fans, even in this thread and it's ridiculous. Edited January 17 by Trent W 4 2
Rep2000 Posted January 17 Posted January 17 (edited) 23 minutes ago, Trent W said: No one in tik tok is making up stuff, he has everything well documented they are just catching up with the situation. Maybe the nicepool thing might be the only thing I could think off that tik tok discovered and his team catch up with that. on another topic I was on her side through the first round of drags un August, back then the hate seemed exaggerated She lost me at the sexual harrassment claim ITs UNFORGIVABLE to do that to save your image, I would say even worse for women in general and the victim which is Justin(proven so far). The Nicepool is a reach and a half. The only link was Blake thanking "Gordon Reynolds" in It Ends With Us credits, which also "played" Nicepool. But Gordon Reynolds has been a running joke as Ryan's evil twin since 2016. He used this alias several times for his commercials. So Nicepool is more based on Ryan himself, which is the meta joke in Deadpool. To turn this easily disproved case into a lawsuit with The Mouse is just plain dumb. It's a PR lawsuit again, since it has no case but to attack Ryan's reputation. This "megacelebrity friend" (he does not name them in his lawsuit) thing is another. If this "friend" did pressure him like Ryan, then name the name. They specifically single out this megaceleb out 3 times, but not really accuse them of anything rather than being at Blake's side. This vaguebooking is shady af, since it's barely relevant to the lawsuit, but for sure is a tabloid material for this whole week to come. It's another example of his team engaging in gossip tabloid speaks to muddy the waters more than building his case, especially the Taylor narrative is already throwing around on Tiktok. Edited January 17 by Rep2000
Legend ReX Posted January 17 Posted January 17 4 hours ago, Hey Babes said: Uhh we are getting more text messages This huge ass text alone was a huge red flag, goddam For anyone interested, @devotedly.yours on TikTok is reading through all the pages of the lawsuit. These texts are giving 4
Dante Silva Posted January 17 Posted January 17 1 hour ago, Rep2000 said: This "megacelebrity friend" (he does not name them in his lawsuit) thing is another. If this "friend" did pressure him like Ryan, then name the name. They specifically single out this megaceleb out 3 times, but not really accuse them of anything rather than being at Blake's side. This vaguebooking is shady af, since it's barely relevant to the lawsuit Have you been living under a rock? Multiple sources online name Taylor. The reason the pressure that was placed on Justin is relevant is that it was a David vs. Goliath situation. Blake was determined to have her iteration of the rooftop scene be the one used in the movie, and she enlisted both Ryan and Taylor (who appeared out of nowhere) to convince Justin that Blake's version of the scene was amazing. The unspoken threat being that Ryan and Taylor are two of the most powerful celebrities in the world, and if Justin did not acquiesce to Blake's desire to take control over that pivotal scene in the movie, then Ryan and Taylor would use their considerable influence to bury Justin, who was only a small-time independent film producer in a temporary partnership with Sony. It turns out Blake never even wrote the scene (it was Ryan), but he couldn't admit to it because he wrote it during the Hollywood writers' strike, and if he had taken credit for it, it would have made him a 'scab' who had crossed a picket line. 7
GiselleBeyince Posted January 17 Posted January 17 5 hours ago, Hey Babes said: Uhh we are getting more text messages This huge ass text alone was a huge red flag, goddam For anyone interested, @devotedly.yours on TikTok is reading through all the pages of the lawsuit. This section is crazy. The way her text message continued on the next page. Oh my god Justin is a fool. After this, you just KNOW what time it is and that sis is on something else. She quadruple texted him about her connections (Taylor, Hugh, Ryan). I pray they don't settle. This needs to go to trial. The truth needs to be revealed. I knew something was off in her original complaint when she said he cried to her in her trailer for two hours straight because the internet was calling her fat. Like, be serious....at least make your stories sound believable if you want to play this game. 5
Rep2000 Posted January 17 Posted January 17 Just now, Dante Silva said: Have you been living under a rock? Multiple sources online name Taylor. The reason the pressure that was placed on Justin is relevant is that it was a David vs. Goliath situation. Blake was determined to have her iteration of the rooftop scene be the one used in the movie, and she enlisted both Ryan and Taylor (who appeared out of nowhere) to convince Justin that Blake's version of the scene was amazing. The unspoken threat being that Ryan and Taylor are two of the most powerful celebrities in the world, and if Justin did not acquiesce to Blake's desire to take control over that pivotal scene in the movie, then Ryan and Taylor would use their considerable influence to bury Justin, who was only a small-time independent film producer in a temporary partnership with Sony. It turns out Blake never even wrote the scene (it was Ryan), but he couldn't admit to it because he wrote it during the Hollywood writers' strike, and if he had taken credit for it, it would have made him a 'scab' who had crossed a picket line. Have you live under the rock AND not read the lawsuit by Baldoni? Taylor was specifically unamed in it. There's not a single "swift" in the doc. His team is very specifically vaguebooking here. While at the same time, also making sure we know how famous this person is and how famously close to Blake. This is not what a legalese document should be written ffs. It's very gossipy TMZ materials, which is why only "multiple source online" name Taylor. Baldoni didn't write this lawsuit for the court, he uses several tabloid languages to engage with the public opinions more than building a case. This aligns perfectly with his Crisis PR doc where they were going to weaponize Taylor's friendship with Blake. He just made another slip up.
Dante Silva Posted January 17 Posted January 17 2 minutes ago, Rep2000 said: Have you live under the rock AND not read the lawsuit by Baldoni? Taylor was specifically unamed in it. There's not a single "swift" in the doc. His team is very specifically vaguebooking here. While at the same time, also making sure we know how famous this person is and how famously close to Blake. This is not what a legalese document should be written ffs. It's very gossipy TMZ materials, which is why only "multiple source online" name Taylor. Baldoni didn't write this lawsuit for the court, he uses several tabloid languages to engage with the public opinions more than building a case. This aligns perfectly with his Crisis PR doc where they were going to weaponize Taylor's friendship with Blake. He just made another slip up. Gurl, you are so on the wrong side of history to the point of embarrassment. 4
Rep2000 Posted January 17 Posted January 17 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Dante Silva said: Gurl, you are so on the wrong side of history to the point of embarrassment. You really want to say this while siding with Melissa Nathan and her goons of Johnny Depp defenders? Gurl, just read the doc and make your own mind. Baldoni's "legal" arguement against another woman in this lawsuit is literally "she crazy": Quote Meanwhile, Stephanie Jones ("Jones"), founder of Jonesworks LLC ("Jonesworks"), Wayfarer's and Baldoni's erstwhile PR firm, was embroiled in a personal and professional crisis. Her increasingly erratic behavior had driven away not only high-profile clients, but also her right-hand woman, Plaintiff Jennifer Abel ("Abel"), who oversaw the Jonesworks Los Angeles office. Jones' behavior grew more and more bizarre as she lashed out at loyal clients like Wayfarer in rage-filled rants, and veered away from professional experience and strategy when making critical decisions affecting Jonesworks clients. Edited January 17 by Rep2000
Dante Silva Posted January 17 Posted January 17 6 minutes ago, Rep2000 said: You really want to say this while siding with Melissa Nathan and her goons of Johnny Depp defenders? Gurl, just read the doc and make your own mind. I did. The text string (in its entirety) provides a lot of insight. None of which benefits mole lady or the NYT. 2
Rep2000 Posted January 17 Posted January 17 (edited) 16 minutes ago, Dante Silva said: I did. The text string (in its entirety) provides a lot of insight. None of which benefits mole lady or the NYT. If you read it in its entirety, then surely you can pick up the inconsistency where Baldoni claimed they never saw the 17-point agreement in his NYT lawsuit, yes? But now in this lawsuit, apparently they had found it. Or how familiar the Depp's lawsuit language compares to this one. They are using the same strategy. Edited January 17 by Rep2000 1
Carry My Heart Posted January 17 Posted January 17 (edited) Hilarious how Baldoni's lawyers claim (on page 152 of the initial complaint) that this exchange "constitutes the entirety of the purported evidence underlying the allegation of a 'smear campaign' orchestrated [by Baldoni against Lively]" yet they coincidentally left out these texts which illustrate Blake's allegations perfectly They never address this very crucial evidence in the entirety of the filing – one of many purposeful omissions. Leave it to the ex Depp defenders to rush to Baldoni's defense though. Losers of a feather flock together or however that goes... Edited January 17 by Carry My Heart
GiselleBeyince Posted January 17 Posted January 17 (edited) Alright so I am finishing up reading all of his lawsuit. I think everyone should focus on the sexual assault allegations in both suits. Re: Justin lawsuit is super long because he isn't only using it as a grounds for defamation. It includes contractual breaches (her taking over the film), an aspect the general public doesn't care about. The meat of matter for most people is the assault claims levied in Blake's complaint. He responds to a lot of her points on pages 49-70 of his. For the girlies that don't like to read, so scroll to those pages, open Blake's CRD complaint, and match up the dates and timeline, especially her 17 Point Return to Work Document. This is why myself and others do not believe her. The SAG strike commenced on July 14, 2023. Filming began in May 2023. So, the alleged assault happened over a two month period. Yet, in Justin's new lawsuit, she is texting him casually during the summer after the strikes started. Mind you this is after filming and the assault. Many of the private interactions they had at her penthouse would also be during the time and after that her lawsuit States the assault occurred. The 17 Point Document, stipulating the conditions of her return to set, had an intimacy coordinators clause. One must be available at all times for Ms. Lively. However, there was already one hired by Justin and his production company. The text messages of him scheduling the meeting with her prior to filming proves this. She replied to that text. There are also emails from Blake's lawyers and Wayfarer Studios mention SAG AFTRA, the actor's union, signing off (approval) of said intimacy coordinator. There is also another email of Wayfarer to Blake Lively's lawyer agreeing to and signing of a Nudity Rider that Wayfarer requested to be approved by SAG's intimacy coordinator. This is from May 2023. How can Blake say she requested an intimacy coordinator because she felt unsafe on set and only received one after the 17 Point Document (crafted in November 2023), when there was one already hired and her team agreed by email in May 2023? She also included requesting a Nudity Rider in the 17 Point Document on November 2023, when that was ALREADY a part of her production agreement from Justin's production studio. Again, there are emails in his lawsuit that proves/confirms this. Additionally, Justin's lawsuit responded to each 17 Point mentioned in Blake's lawsuit w/ emails and text messages detailing the process; disputing, defending, and contextualizes her allegations w/ receipts. Whether they are strong enough to disprove her claims, that is up to the courts and the reader. I am begging y'all to read pages 49-70 of his suit. That's the only section that is important re: the sexual assault accusations. That section is his rebuttal. You don't NEED to read everything else unless you're messy and want all the tea about her being a diva and control freak. Go through it with hers and come back here, and share your thoughts. I am thinking Blake and her team are massive unreliable narrators here. This needs to go to trial expeditiously. ETA: Why did Blake request to edit the film with him, privately, in 2024 after filming wrapped after the airing out his abusive ways to her husband, the studio, and others just recently in January 2024? Why be in the stead such an abusive prick? Edited January 17 by GiselleBeyince 2 6
Trent W Posted January 17 Posted January 17 Atrl is one of the only places that I see people defending Amber Heard and Blake And I don't hate any of those women, I think that Depp is trash but Amber was proven an abuser, and people here love to paint her as some victim I wonder if it's because they are white women or something but people turning a blind eye in mountains of evidence is insane I've always wondered if people here aren't capable to understand that some women are just also evil? Lmao 5
GiselleBeyince Posted January 17 Posted January 17 16 minutes ago, GiselleBeyince said: Alright so I am finishing up reading all of his lawsuit. I think everyone should focus on the sexual assault allegations in both suits. Re: Justin lawsuit is super long because he isn't only using it as a grounds for defamation. It includes contractual breaches (her taking over the film), an aspect the general public doesn't care about. The meat of matter for most people is the assault claims levied in Blake's complaint. He responds to a lot of her points on pages 49-70 of his. For the girlies that don't like to read, so scroll to those pages, open Blake's CRD complaint, and match up the dates and timeline, especially her 17 Point Return to Work Document. This is why myself and others do not believe her. The SAG strike commenced on July 14, 2023. Filming began in May 2023. So, the alleged assault happened over a two month period. Yet, in Justin's new lawsuit, she is texting him casually during the summer after the strikes started. Mind you this is after filming and the assault. Many of the private interactions they had at her penthouse would also be during the time and after that her lawsuit States the assault occurred. The 17 Point Document, stimulating the conditions of her returning to set, had an intimacy coordinators clause. One must be available at all times for Ms. Lively. However, there was already one hired by Justin and his production company. The text messages of him scheduling the meeting with her prior to filming proves this. She replied to that text. There are also emails from Blake's lawyers and Wayfarer Studios mention SAG AFTRA, the actor's union, signing off (approval) of said intimacy coordinator. There is also another email of Wayfarer to Blake Lively's lawyer agreeing to and signing of a Nudity Rider that Wayfarer requested to be approved by SAG's intimacy coordinator. This is from May 2023. How can Blake say she requested an intimacy coordinator because she felt unsafe on set and only received one after the 17 Point Document (crafted in November 2023), when there was one already hired and her team agreed by email in May 2023? She also included requesting a Nudity Rider in the 17 Point Document on November 2023, when that was ALREADY a part of her production agreement from Justin's production studio. Again, there are emails in his lawsuit that proves confirms this. Additionally, Justin's lawsuit responded to each 17 Point mentioned in Blake's lawsuit w/ emails and text messages detailing the process; disputing, defending, and contextualizes her allegations w/ receipts. Whether they are strong enough to disprove her claims, that is up to the courts and the reader. I blame begging y'all to read pages 49-70 of his suit. That's the only section that is important re: the sexual assault accusations. That section is his rebuttal. You don't NEED to read everything else unless you're messy and want all the tea about her being a diva and control freak. Go through it with hers and come back here, and share your thoughts. I am thinking Blake and her team are massive unreliable narrators here. This needs to go to trial expeditiously. ETA: Why did Blake request to edit the film with him, privately, in 2024 after filming wrapped after the airing out his abusive ways to her husband, the studio, and others just recently in January 2024? Why be in the stead such an abusive prick? Page 54-55 details verbatim the details of the onset interaction that Blake says Justin kissed her, worked his lips down her neck, and says she smells good. This interaction is the one she said was NOT choreographed and he used filming to assault her while she's in character. Her lawsuit states the interaction of the assault was not recorded. Unfortunately for Plantation Barbie, the entire exchange was recorded as Justin Baldoni was wearing a mic. The recording has the full context and her laughing throughout, breaking character. She did not feel uncomfortable based on her comments in that moment. All of which was recorded. Lord, I keep reading and finding gems that conflict w/ her claims. 1 1
Sexyzinger Posted January 17 Posted January 17 9 hours ago, Hey Babes said: "This lawsuit is a legal action based on an overwhelming amount of untampered evidence detailing Blake Lively and her team's duplicitous attempt to destroy Justin Baldoni, his team and their respective companies by disseminating grossly edited, unsubstantiated, new and doctored information to the media," Freedman said in a statement on Thursday. "It is clear based on our own all out willingness to provide all complete text messages, emails, video footage and other documentary evidence that was shared between the parties in real time, that this is a battle she will not win and will certainly regret." They are ready for the discovery to start Oh he's about to bury these vanilla wafer flops. Their vile behavior going unchecked for so long. Long overdue 1 1
Rep2000 Posted January 17 Posted January 17 (edited) Wait, how did I just find out bout this "voice note"? And also exclusively on Megyn Kelly (yikes). Baldoni is really going down the Depp strategy to a t. Oh there is going to be a lot of edited "leaked audios" coming out. Edit: damn, not he calling AMC Lincoln Square's basement movie theater as "the basement". Edited January 17 by Rep2000 1
Rep2000 Posted January 17 Posted January 17 Also, not ******* Candance Owens is defending him. Huge yikes!
xluvxduffxmusicx Posted January 17 Posted January 17 I'm so confused, does Baldoni's lawsuit read as legit? Does he have the potential of disproving Blake's claims?
Recommended Posts