Trent W Posted Wednesday at 12:17 AM Posted Wednesday at 12:17 AM 2 minutes ago, Bewitched said: This will just be going on forever I personally feel dumb to even have an opinion in this topic I think this is just 2 narcissists fighting each other over who will get the most positive image Anyone taking sides at this point has to question themselves if they are willing to be manipulated The press has been exposed for sale at any price 2
Bewitched Posted Wednesday at 12:25 AM Posted Wednesday at 12:25 AM (edited) Edited Wednesday at 12:28 AM by Bewitched
Vermillion Posted Wednesday at 12:27 AM Posted Wednesday at 12:27 AM Wait a minute, why hasn't Justin filed the countersuit against Blake instead as was originally reported was coming? Way too much to unpack here. Also @Gui Blackout can we get a title change if we're not getting another thread out of this?
Vermillion Posted Wednesday at 12:30 AM Posted Wednesday at 12:30 AM @Ryan The Times story absolutely deserves it's own thread, imho.
wastedpotential Posted Wednesday at 12:31 AM Posted Wednesday at 12:31 AM 10 minutes ago, Bewitched said: I haven't read his filing yet and I'm sure someone will pick it apart, but just based off of the Variety article, this doesn't seem especially strong? There's reportedly evidence that one of the trailer visits was consensual, claims that some of the claimed planted stories were organic, purports that the "porn" was a clip of Justin's wife's home birth () and claims that Blake's people were also seeding stories. I guess they're able to prove that Blake mirrored some of the "bad" things that Justin did and that it's not as black and white as the NYT made it out to be, but if they're going for libel, don't they need to be able to explicitly prove that the claims were false?
wastedpotential Posted Wednesday at 12:31 AM Posted Wednesday at 12:31 AM 5 minutes ago, Bewitched said: I can't keep up omg
Rocket Posted Wednesday at 12:32 AM Posted Wednesday at 12:32 AM 5 minutes ago, Bewitched said: What's next, sis? 4
Vermillion Posted Wednesday at 12:34 AM Posted Wednesday at 12:34 AM For all this upheaval and scandal that the entire PR industry is now citing as a game changer you'd think the movie would be far better Honestly I wish it was to justify this cluster****. I'm gonna wait for the dust to settle and don't have the patience to read any filing atm. Peace.
Richie Posted Wednesday at 01:12 AM Posted Wednesday at 01:12 AM He is suing the NYT.. I wonder if he will sue Blake
Rep2000 Posted Wednesday at 06:05 AM Posted Wednesday at 06:05 AM (edited) 6 hours ago, Vermillion said: Wait a minute, why hasn't Justin filed the countersuit against Blake instead as was originally reported was coming? Way too much to unpack here. Also @Gui Blackout can we get a title change if we're not getting another thread out of this? Well, the original lawsuit from Blake that opened the floodgate was not officially a lawsuit. It was filed to CA Civil Right's Dept to obtain the notice of being allowed to sue. She technically hadn't sued him yet, and was just prepping for one in CA. However, she just bypassed all that and went with federal court in NY instead today. Oh this is just getting even bigger. Edited Wednesday at 06:31 AM by Rep2000 2
Rep2000 Posted Wednesday at 06:26 AM Posted Wednesday at 06:26 AM (edited) 8 hours ago, wastedpotential said: I haven't read his filing yet and I'm sure someone will pick it apart, but just based off of the Variety article, this doesn't seem especially strong? There's reportedly evidence that one of the trailer visits was consensual, claims that some of the claimed planted stories were organic, purports that the "porn" was a clip of Justin's wife's home birth () and claims that Blake's people were also seeding stories. I guess they're able to prove that Blake mirrored some of the "bad" things that Justin did and that it's not as black and white as the NYT made it out to be, but if they're going for libel, don't they need to be able to explicitly prove that the claims were false? Yeah his lawsuit to NYT is very weak comparing to Blake's very documented and receipt-based legal complaint, or even to his former PR manager's one. The fact that they try to argue the emoji 🙃 means they were just "sarcastic" when they were dicussing how to destroy Blake's reputation, I- It's a SLAPP lawsuit (see: Gawker bankruptcy) from Baldoni to fight back with a big money tag. But it's most likely be thrown out of court just because it has no legs. In order for him to win, he has to prove a) NYT knowingly published fake information AND b) NYT does that specifically with malice (which is impossible to prove, since NYT is reporting excerpts from a legal lawsuit, which is completely legit). He and his billionaire are trying to muddy the waters, since clearly they are caught bare footed with Blake's legal complaint. Edited Wednesday at 08:50 AM by Rep2000 1 5
Cleanromantic Posted Wednesday at 11:59 AM Posted Wednesday at 11:59 AM 5 hours ago, Rep2000 said: Yeah his lawsuit to NYT is very weak comparing to Blake's very documented and receipt-based legal complaint, or even to his former PR manager's one. The fact that they try to argue the emoji 🙃 means they were just "sarcastic" when they were dicussing how to destroy Blake's reputation, I- It's a SLAPP lawsuit (see: Gawker bankruptcy) from Baldoni to fight back with a big money tag. But it's most likely be thrown out of court just because it has no legs. In order for him to win, he has to prove a) NYT knowingly published fake information AND b) NYT does that specifically with malice (which is impossible to prove, since NYT is reporting excerpts from a legal lawsuit, which is completely legit). He and his billionaire are trying to muddy the waters, since clearly they are caught bare footed with Blake's legal complaint. Him suggesting that her signing a text with X was an invitation for him to sexually harrass her. It's that "she was asking for it because she wore a short skirt" mindset. The audacity if men... 3
Gaia Posted Wednesday at 12:02 PM Posted Wednesday at 12:02 PM Blake already losing her 5 seconds of goodwill with the new lawsuit on TikTok. Saw a lawyer post about Baldoni's suit and said they had a lot of evidence in their suit that Blake very intentionally mislead with a lot of her receipts and claims and posted texts without full context (which court wouldn't allow, they'd force the entire chain to be submitted). Saw a crisis PR manager saying Blake is just doing the exact same thing Baldoni did (smear campaign) and is no better and people shouldn't take sides. Most comments agreed everyone in this situation seems like a **** person and I'm in that boat. 10 3 2
KingWitch Posted Wednesday at 12:06 PM Posted Wednesday at 12:06 PM Lol now we see who was really trying to do a PR spin with half truths , I wonder where the lawsuits will end .
Rep2000 Posted Wednesday at 01:28 PM Posted Wednesday at 01:28 PM On 12/22/2024 at 6:51 AM, Rep2000 said: Honey, you are asking ATRLers to read for themselves here (fun fact: they can't). They would rather wait for a 5 mins Tiktok to tell them what to think, judging by most the comments in here. 1 hour ago, Gaia said: Blake already losing her 5 seconds of goodwill with the new lawsuit on TikTok. Saw a lawyer post about Baldoni's suit and said they had a lot of evidence in their suit that Blake very intentionally mislead with a lot of her receipts and claims and posted texts without full context (which court wouldn't allow, they'd force the entire chain to be submitted). Saw a crisis PR manager saying Blake is just doing the exact same thing Baldoni did (smear campaign) and is no better and people shouldn't take sides. Most comments agreed everyone in this situation seems like a **** person and I'm in that boat. 9
Bussea Posted Wednesday at 01:46 PM Posted Wednesday at 01:46 PM i feel like i'm the only one who doesn't know what's going on and genuinely doesn't care ddd this whole thing is so funny bc one day people are dragging blake on social media and then I see the same people trying to drag the other guy and it's like
JBJT2786 Posted Wednesday at 02:39 PM Posted Wednesday at 02:39 PM 1 hour ago, Rep2000 said: Not you being Nostradamus and being proven right gurl
MattieB Posted Wednesday at 05:04 PM Posted Wednesday at 05:04 PM 4 hours ago, Gaia said: Blake already losing her 5 seconds of goodwill with the new lawsuit on TikTok. Saw a lawyer post about Baldoni's suit and said they had a lot of evidence in their suit that Blake very intentionally mislead with a lot of her receipts and claims and posted texts without full context (which court wouldn't allow, they'd force the entire chain to be submitted). Saw a crisis PR manager saying Blake is just doing the exact same thing Baldoni did (smear campaign) and is no better and people shouldn't take sides. Most comments agreed everyone in this situation seems like a **** person and I'm in that boat. What did I tell yall? Plantation barbie was on a mission to revamp her image. I hope Justin destroys them 7
MattieB Posted Wednesday at 05:05 PM Posted Wednesday at 05:05 PM Leave it to ATRL to back a racist white woman though 4
Richie Posted Wednesday at 05:37 PM Posted Wednesday at 05:37 PM 27 minutes ago, MattieB said: Leave it to ATRL to back a racist white woman though It is mostly that fanbase that is always weaponized… you go to Instagram, Facebook, Twitter and everybody is dragging Mrs Lively. 2
orange22 Posted Wednesday at 05:40 PM Posted Wednesday at 05:40 PM 7 hours ago, MattieB said: Well, well, well How the turn tables! 1
orange22 Posted Wednesday at 05:44 PM Posted Wednesday at 05:44 PM 3 hours ago, Bussea said: i feel like i'm the only one who doesn't know what's going on and genuinely doesn't care ddd this whole thing is so funny bc one day people are dragging blake on social media and then I see the same people trying to drag the other guy and it's like People hate nuance! Like 2 things can be true ladies!
Recommended Posts