Jump to content

Celebrity private jet usage in 2024


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, Burn said:

She's not. If you check OP's source ( https://celebrityprivatejettracker.com/leaderboard/#gref ) Beyoncé is not listed. OP has added that in themselves, tut tut.

The challenge (as you well know) is that any jet owned by Jay is also owned by Beyonce (which is not the case for non-married couples), and short of being a fan keeping up with pap pics and both of their specific moves, there's no way to tell who was flying where on what jet. I guess we can call it misogyny for his name being registered first (and I guess the only name scraped for this website). Now, OP clearly set up an attempted drag, but it's not at all inconceivable to think that Beyonce is responsible for at least some of those flights.

Edited by wastedpotential
  • Like 1

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • BrokenMachine

    4

  • Gui Blackout

    2

  • Illuminati

    2

  • Rep2000

    2

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
48 minutes ago, The Music Industry said:

Unfortunately this won't be a hit thread because Taylor Swift didn't make the list :(

well she rides coach so we have nothing to track.

  • Confused 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, Loca said:

It was literally posted 40 minutes ago. Dont be obtuse like that.

 

OT: lock them all up 

spacer.png

 

 

Posted
37 minutes ago, Gui Blackout said:

So Beyonce has her own plane and they fly separately? That would be even worse

It's neither, actually.  The plane listed is the Puma plane they designed as part of Jay's contract.  It's for the use of Puma execs and official business use, and the Carters are allowed to use it privately as well.

 

maxresdefault.jpg

 

Many of those flights listed under Jay Z would've actually been used by the C-suite at Puma for business travel.

  • Like 3
Posted

How is Taylor not there now? After a year of non stop touring. Is she hiding it

  • Like 3
Posted

We been knew the Taylor ecological terrorist narrative was completely overblown, we been knew the mega multi billionaires are much worse. 

  • Like 5
  • Confused 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Burn said:

Kylie Jenner (honorable mention Timothée Chalamet)

:deadbanana:

Posted
1 hour ago, piotrert said:

1. Donald Trump - 27 785t

No wonder the annoying orange denies climate change with so much passion :redface:

Posted

Angel Olsen: 0 flights :clap3:

Posted
18 minutes ago, Sawk said:

We been knew the Taylor ecological terrorist narrative was completely overblown, we been knew the mega multi billionaires are much worse. 

She's still in the list and polluted in a year the pollution an average person would do in three lifetimes :suburban:

  • Haha 2
Posted
37 minutes ago, Red Velvet said:

How is Taylor not there now? After a year of non stop touring. Is she hiding it

The other report was told to be fake news. She still pollutes way too much, and tried to sue the person who tracked the planes, so the lashings were deserved anyways :ryan3:

Posted
3 minutes ago, BrokenMachine said:

She's still in the list and polluted in a year the pollution an average person would do in three lifetimes :suburban:

She for sure is not guilt-free, but the way Twitter and Insta were positioning her as the biggest polluter on Earth was crazy. She can still do better, but I have faith she'll come around: manifesting a Tay Tree Hugger (TTH) Era :alexz:

 

Posted

Who did Female Elon pay to get scrubbed off this list? :psyduck:

  • Haha 4
  • Thumbs Down 3
Posted

And none of them are touring, unlike a certain artist everyone loves to drag for her private jet shenanigans yet she didn't even crack top 10 :bibliahh:

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, ICLDXU4HS said:

Who did Female Elon pay to get scrubbed off this list? :psyduck:

She is on the list, she is #45

Posted
2 hours ago, The Music Industry said:

Unfortunately this won't be a hit thread because Taylor Swift didn't make the list :(

this being a fact :bibliahh:

Posted

reading-michael-jackson.gif

Posted
1 hour ago, ShouldersSideways said:

It's neither, actually.  The plane listed is the Puma plane they designed as part of Jay's contract.  It's for the use of Puma execs and official business use, and the Carters are allowed to use it privately as well.

 

maxresdefault.jpg

 

Many of those flights listed under Jay Z would've actually been used by the C-suite at Puma for business travel.

So OP is probably not only misleading, but a liar and a swiftie lol

  • Thanks 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted

Jay Z (honorable mention Beyoncé) - 4 594t

 

And certain fanbase have audacity to call out Taylor :suburban:

  • Like 1
Posted

First Beyonce tops Taylor as best popstar, now she tops Taylor as biggest polluter. Beyonce keeps winning, Taylor keeps losing :clap3:

  • Haha 1
Posted

Looks like Ga Ga & Taylor are the most recent MPG polluters :giraffe:

 

Taylor Swift (plane #1)Dassault Falcon seven (N621MM) left from Vancouver International Airport (YVR), Canada traveled to Nashville International Airport (BNA), within the past few hours. 
80 flights tracked since 11/13/2023 

 


Lady Gaga's Gulfstream V (N474D) left from Opa Locka Airport (OPF), traveled to Teterboro Airport (TEB), New Jersey on December 1st

 97 flights tracked since 05/21/2023

Posted

oh bey thunberg :clap3: the environmental activist that you are

Posted

i always cackle when fans of certain girls drag Taylor for being an "evil capitalist" and "eco-terrorist" :clack:

  • Haha 2
Posted

It would be interesting to see how many hours of private jets usage celebs rented out

Posted (edited)

I don't trust this data. Some people rent for a day, rent for a year, own plane(s), there's no way they are able to track everything and report an overall view accurately. The sourcing is weak

 

I am sure certain celebs, who are very aware of the optics that have followed them about this, have been working HARD to minimize visibility around their traveling schedule 

Edited by Attaboy
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.