Jump to content

Drake sues UMG & Spotify over Kendrick Lamar


Recommended Posts

Posted
8 hours ago, Hey Babes said:

How is he still considered to be a rapper at this point? :clack:

He was and always will be a pop girl. 

  • Haha 6

  • Replies 427
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Wicked

    21

  • Cbreezy

    8

  • Seeyuh

    8

  • HarleyWin

    8

Posted

im glad the rest of the world is seeing the white man I've been seeing all these years

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted

oh diva! stay messy

  • Haha 2
Posted

I don't get how anyone would have thought this would have been a good move :rip: He got dragged and now he withdrawn the lawsuit. Like what did he think would happen :deadbanana4:

Posted
2 minutes ago, Burn said:

:lmao:

One more L for the Degrassi chanteuse.

 

spacer.png

  • Like 1
Posted

:rip:

Posted (edited)

Update:

 

:skull:

Edited by B-Luke
  • Haha 8
Posted

what a ******* LOSER!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Pathetic 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

The duck face gangster retreats to the fancy condo once again.

  • Haha 5
Posted

girl the Kim selfie face :suburban:

Posted

He realised they were his bread and butter :clap3:

Posted

Dork. 

  • Haha 1
Posted

loser

  • Thanks 1
Posted

It's getting worse and worse for him, I live. 

  • Haha 4
Posted

Doesn't mean he backtracked, but y'all on this forum just see things from a drama/stan lens, so… :matty:

 

UMG didn't want their hand to be shown, so it was best this was dropped for all parties involved.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Kings. said:

Doesn't mean he backtracked, but y'all on this forum just see things from a drama/stan lens, so… :matty:

 

UMG didn't want their hand to be shown, so it was best this was dropped for all parties involved.

Tell us what it means then friend!

  • Haha 8
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted (edited)

This is more weak than submitting it in the first place, get a damn back bone :deadbanana2:

Edited by KingWitch
Posted
10 minutes ago, Kings. said:

Doesn't mean he backtracked, but y'all on this forum just see things from a drama/stan lens, so… :matty:

 

UMG didn't want their hand to be shown, so it was best this was dropped for all parties involved.

What it probably means is that his lawyers couldn't find any evidence of any of what they were accusing Spotify of doing, so had to withdrawal.  Had they had evidence, they most certainly would've continued

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

I really hope Kendrick brings Wayne out for the Super Bowl

 

The final nail in the coffin :sistrens:

Edited by king_queen
Posted
6 minutes ago, ABeyBraith said:

Tell us what it means then friend!

It means the same old payola patterns that you see in the music industry, especially on radio, will continue.

Posted (edited)
Quote

Drake is not backing down in the war against his own label, in fact he's now upped the ante by suing Universal Music Group for spreading the "false and malicious narrative" he's a pedophile ... TMZ Hip Hop has learned.

 

Drake filed the defamation case Wednesday morning in federal court in NYC ... ripping UMG for releasing and promoting Kendrick Lamar's vicious diss track, "Not Like Us." In the docs, obtained by TMZ Hip Hop, Drake says UMG knew full well Kendrick's lyrics, and images in the music video, referring to Drake as a pedophile were false and dangerous.

Quote

In the suit he calls Kendrick's hit -- filled with "inflammatory and shocking allegations"-- was a "gold mine" for UMG ... and he says they had an ulterior financial motive in promoting it.

 

Drake claims his label was doing everything it could to pump up "Not Like Us" because it knew it would devalue Drake's music and brand ... and therefore give UMG leverage in future contract negotiations with Drake.

Quote

Drake says he's got bot receipts to show just how far the label went to turn Kendrick's song into an anthem. According to the suit, UMG paid a third party to use bots to increase the song's streams by at least 30 million -- and engaged in a "pay for play" scheme with at least one radio promoter.

 

He claims UMG attached the label "chart-topper" to "Not Like Us," despite knowing that title was based on fraudulent data.

 

It's also clear Drake's very mindful of what's going down in New Orleans next month -- in the suit, he claims UMG was in on getting Kendrick the Super Bowl Halftime gig ... so, the song could be performed on that massive stage, which he calls "one of the most significant (and viewed) cultural events of the year."

Quote

Interestingly, Drake isn't going directly after Kendrick in the suit -- in fact, he says, "This lawsuit is not about the artist who created 'Not Like Us.' It is, instead, entirely about UMG, the music company that decided to publish, promote, exploit, and monetize" the song which it knew contained false claims.

Quote

The music industry -- and fans of Kendrick and Drake -- thought Drake was retreating in this legal battle, because on Tuesday he'd filed a motion to drop a legal action he'd filed against UMG and Spotify in New York state court. Our sources tell us that was merely done to clear the way for this new federal case.

spacer.png

https://www.tmz.com/2025/01/15/drake-files-federal-lawsuit-against-umg-over-kendrick-lamar-not-like-us-feud/

Edited by hallucinate
  • Haha 6
Posted

 

  • Haha 2
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.