glitch Posted November 22, 2024 Posted November 22, 2024 (edited) Quote The Grammy-nominated singer, 40, has been locked in a trademark feud with the style guru by the same name since 2009. However, the Down Under couturier was born Katie Perry. The "I Kissed a Girl" songbird's legal name is Katheryn Elizabeth Hudson. Quote Australian Katie tells The Post, "I have lost everything, including my trademark. As you can imagine I'm devastated." She continued, "My label has been a dream of mine since I was 11 years old and now that dream that I have worked so hard for, since 2006, has been taken away. What do I do now? I will dust myself off and figure what the next steps are. Perhaps move to somewhere in the world where the name Katie Perry has no meaning." Quote She also recalled one painful moment during the trial when she was forced to read emails between the singer and her manager where Perry called the designer a "dumb b–ch." Source Edited November 22, 2024 by glitch 4 5
glitch Posted November 22, 2024 Author Posted November 22, 2024 Katy is also in a legal dispute with an 84 year old veteran over the sale of his $15M mansion. He agreed to sell his home to the singer but changed his mind and she's determined to get her paws on it 1
simplywohoo Posted November 22, 2024 Posted November 22, 2024 Both lawsuits are pretty reasonable lbr 3
Popular Post Onyxmage Posted November 22, 2024 Popular Post Posted November 22, 2024 16 minutes ago, glitch said: Perhaps move to somewhere in the world where the name Katie Perry has no meaning." Move to the US Queen. 68
Popular Post popmusicisdead Posted November 22, 2024 Popular Post Posted November 22, 2024 (edited) Karma always comes for the godmother of Dr. Luke's children in the end -the nun took her music career with her to hell. -the veteran is coming for her shoe line. -and Ms. Katie Perry is coming for her man Edited November 22, 2024 by popmusicisdead 20 1
Popular Post Smarticle Posted November 22, 2024 Popular Post Posted November 22, 2024 Quote where Perry called the designer a "dumb b–ch." We know she's mean 7 1 10 1
Cry Posted November 22, 2024 Posted November 22, 2024 Did we expect any better from the Dr Luke collaborator? 4 1
Katy.Kat.23 Posted November 22, 2024 Posted November 22, 2024 Well the woman sued her first FIVE YEARS after the Prismatic Tour because she said that the merch infringed on her copyright. Be a dumb greedy ***** and find out I guess. 12
Kern Posted November 22, 2024 Posted November 22, 2024 Worst MPG of all time. Literally everything about her is a mess 17 1 7
Popular Post Sugar-Rush Posted November 22, 2024 Popular Post Posted November 22, 2024 Quote She also recalled one painful moment during the trial when she was forced to read emails between the singer and her manager where Perry called the designer a "dumb b–ch." Maybe Kesha and Gaga were right about Katy being mean after all 16 1
Alaska. Posted November 22, 2024 Posted November 22, 2024 39 minutes ago, Sugar-Rush said: Maybe Kesha and Gaga were right about Katy being mean after all Given her obsession with chart success and that embarrassing talk with Stevie Nicks about rivals, are we surprised? And the nun controversy shows God isn't the one on Katheryn's side 12 3
Popular Post alexrex Posted November 22, 2024 Popular Post Posted November 22, 2024 (edited) She has destroyed a lot lately: - A nun and her home - Her career - Her morals - Greatest Love of All - The US election - Little entrepreneurs (to sell some horrible shoes) - And the ears of millions around the globe She should be labelled as a terrorist and condemned for her crimes against humanity. Also brave of her calling someone a dumb b when she's not the brightest cookie out there. Edited November 22, 2024 by alexrex 4 5 10 4
toy soldier. Posted November 22, 2024 Posted November 22, 2024 She needs to have some income I guess 2
Popular Post Riverbank Posted November 22, 2024 Popular Post Posted November 22, 2024 If I were the designer I would just trademark Fadty Perrished and use it so I can get my lick back 20
Maneater Posted November 22, 2024 Posted November 22, 2024 I thought it was going to be because she wore one of their items and sales dropped or something 5
Shelter Posted November 22, 2024 Posted November 22, 2024 At least she survived unlike some of her other victims 1
Velvet Night Posted November 22, 2024 Posted November 22, 2024 At this point I can't remember the last time Katy Perry had GOOD PR… 4
Nefertiti0 Posted November 22, 2024 Posted November 22, 2024 (edited) The court mentioned that Katy Perry had sent a "cease and desist" letter to Ms Taylor, who sells clothes under her birth name Katie Perry, before suggesting they come to a "coexistence agreement". "Ms Taylor rejected that offer of a coexistence agreement, which, as circumstances turned out, would have been an excellent outcome for both parties," the judgment said. "Having rejected the offer, Ms Taylor then chose to commence infringement proceedings ... In that sense, Ms Taylor has brought this result on herself. Unfortunately, it is no longer possible to return to the time of peaceful coexistence." theguardian.com/music/2024/nov/22/katy-perry-appeal-legal-case-sydney-fashion-label-katie-perry Edited November 22, 2024 by Nefertiti0 4
katykater Posted November 22, 2024 Posted November 22, 2024 Katie Taylor waited till enough clothing and merchandise have been sold on Australian soil. Quote Sydney designer Katie Jane Taylor, who sells clothes under her birth name Katie Perry , sued the singer in October 2019 because the performer was selling her own merchandise. Perry, whose real name is Katheryn Hudson, on Friday successfully appealed the 2023 federal court findings that her firm, Kitty Purry, had engaged in trademark infringement during the 2014 Australian tour. https://www.theguardian.com/music/2024/nov/22/katy-perry-appeal-legal-case-sydney-fashion-label-katie-perry She tried to ride Katy's coattails after she knew that Katy Perry has become famous. Quote "Last week was the end of one of the biggest battle of my business career, The "David and Goliath case" – legal action against the singer, Katy Perry, for infringing my Katie Perry trade mark in Australia – which I've held since 29th September 2008," the Aussie Katie wrote in a blog post in 2022. She got a trade mark after the Summer of 2008. https://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/completelist/0,29569,1834301,00.html https://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/music/g20916017/best-songs-of-the-summer-2008/ Quote "As the fame of one grew internationally, the other became aware of her namesake and filed a trademark application." Perry had used her name as a trademark in good faith during the 2014 Prism tour and had been doing so five years before Taylor launched her own business, the judges noted. The Katie Perry trademark had been applied for when Taylor already knew of the singer's reputation, the judges found. The thief tried to play victim. 8 1 3
Truth Teller Posted November 22, 2024 Posted November 22, 2024 54 minutes ago, Nefertiti0 said: The court mentioned that Katy Perry had sent a "cease and desist" letter to Ms Taylor, who sells clothes under her birth name Katie Perry, before suggesting they come to a "coexistence agreement". "Ms Taylor rejected that offer of a coexistence agreement, which, as circumstances turned out, would have been an excellent outcome for both parties," the judgment said. "Having rejected the offer, Ms Taylor then chose to commence infringement proceedings ... In that sense, Ms Taylor has brought this result on herself. Unfortunately, it is no longer possible to return to the time of peaceful coexistence." theguardian.com/music/2024/nov/22/katy-perry-appeal-legal-case-sydney-fashion-label-katie-perry Oop. Looks like ms Taylor is the Regina George in sheep's clothing 3
Recommended Posts