Kesha goes viral for AI usage

[manuelalex9810]

Just now, Kern said:

Kesha is using AI in her music? Source?

Well you can see it in this thread. Her cover for her new single is part of her music. 

[TomTom]

6 minutes ago, manuelalex9810 said:

Well you can see it in this thread. Her cover for her new single is part of her music. 

Some people use covers made by AI that look accordingly, others release songs that sound like AI, but are in fact real .

Edited 6 hours ago by TomTom

[manuelalex9810]

8 minutes ago, TomTom said:

Some people use covers made by AI that look accordingly, others release songs that sound like AI, but are in fact real .

But the reality is that Kesha went embarrassingly low to use AI for her horrid cover. The cover is not even good.

I mean, I can say the same about  a lot of Kesha's music that sound like AI, but the reality it isn't. 
 

Kesha is now with Nicki Minaj for using AI, embarrassing.  

[TomTom]

2 minutes ago, manuelalex9810 said:

I mean, I can say the same about  a lot of Kesha's music that sound like AI, but the reality it isn't. 

Imagine being a Katy Perry stan and having the audacity to say that someone else's music sounds like AI .

[manuelalex9810]

1 minute ago, TomTom said:

Imagine being a Katy Perry stan and having the audacity to say that someone else's music sounds like AI .

Imagine being a Kesha fan and having the audacity to say that someone else's music sounds like AI.

 

at the end of the day one went that LOW for using AI. 

[The7thStranger]

3 hours ago, Keter said:

People keep talking about this stolen art boogeyman and yet I haven't seen any clear outline of what has been stolen, how it was reused and when, and what the damages are. In at least one case, "stolen" elements and damages could not be identified. And if an AI using existing images to train is infringement, then is learning to paint or draw and being influenced by the style of another also infringement? the court agrees "in the style of" type prompts could infringe on copyright, but it's a complex issue. I love AI and ATRL's soapbox grandstanding ain't bout to do **** but serve me up some cackles. 
 

https://www.lawinc.com/court-allows-copyright-claims-ai-art-lawsuit

It's not just about infringement; it's about AI companies pulling in unearned data from artists and then using it against them.

 

Again, the technology is amazing. It's just a matter of how it's used and how these algorithms get to be what they are.

Edited 5 hours ago by The7thStranger

[velocity]

not people in here acting like she's broke just because she's indie

 

indie artists have had covers before AI existed, yes? this is so embarrassing, honestly. you'd think an artist would value other artists as well but ig not

[Radical Pessimism]

Looks like **** so it must be AI. 

[skeeyee]

Maybe she can't afford otherwise 

[KKKIMO92]

She's cheap, we been known for a long time. Delusional of her thinking all her previous success was ride by her alone.

[KKKIMO92]

She's cheap, we been known for a long time. Delusional of her thinking all her previous success was ride by her alone.

[TomTom]

56 minutes ago, KKKIMO92 said:

She's cheap, we been known for a long time. Delusional of her thinking all her previous success was ride by her alone.

What kind of nonsense 

[ImpressMeMuch]

2 hours ago, manuelalex9810 said:

This is so embarrassing to the music industry, going that low to use AI in your music 

 

This is so embarrassing to the atrl community, going that low to not understand what the thread is about 

[manuelalex9810]

47 minutes ago, ImpressMeMuch said:

This is so embarrassing to the atrl community, going that low to not understand what the thread is about 

It's about the embarrassment of that horrid cheap AI cover.