More music is being released in one day than in the entire year of 1989

[Arrows]

"More music is being released today (in a single day) than was released in the calendar year of 1989": How the music production industry has taken note of the huge number of self-releasing artists | MusicRadar

 

From the article:

 

Spoiler

With the ease at which musicians can not only create and mix, but distribute and self-release their tracks, it's unsurprising that the quantity of music now being put out into the world is significantly higher than it was a few decades ago. But, when compiling a recent deep-dive feature, we were quite surprised to discover just how big that margin has become.

In our long-read investigation into the growth of subscription-based software platforms, our writer Adam Douglas spoke to music business economist Will Page, who is the former Chief Economist of Spotify and UK performing rights agency, PRS for Music. He told us, "More music is being released today (in a single day) than was released in the calendar year of 1989".

As our writer, Adam indicated, that's rather an incredible concept to grasp. Page went on to say that "More of that music is being done by artists themselves, meaning there's even more demand for music production software".

The research process to compile our long-read also indicated that the numbers are only going to grow. In business analyst MiDiA's recent 'State of the music creator economy report', they found that the overall number of music creators was around 75.9 million - a 12 percent increase over the previous year.

But, that number is projected to swell to 198.2 million people by 2030. The reason for this growth is fuelled in part by a rise in what it calls 'consumer-creators.' "Consumer-creators transformed photography (Instagram) and videography (TikTok); music will be next", the analyst predicted in a blog post.

 

So, what does this actually mean for individual music-makers, who are becoming ever-smaller fragments of a balooning galaxy of creators? Well for one thing, music-tool subscription models are unlikely to be supplanted any time soon. As detailed in our extensive feature, the recurring costs of subscription fees soon stack up.

Steve Heithecker of the Pyramind Institute had a particulalry cynical take on what those offering music recurring subscription pricing models are motivated by; "Software companies have followed the lead set by Wall Street. Recurring revenue is very sexy right now. Everyone wants in on it. People often also forget they have the subs and then it's a bit like free money for these companies when they auto renew".

[fememeist]

With the age of internet and just the general ease of information being pushed in a short amount of time, i can see why

[Kayseri Mantisi]

least surprising thing ever  it's like saying more houses have electricity in 2024 compared to 1989

[LovaticSwiftie]

Gurl, not me thinking more unreleased songs from the 1989 era being released. I should learn how to read properly. 

[shimind]

But how many of those actually smash? 99 percent of the albums are forgotten the second day after they are released. Recent examples bring cowboy carter, Halsey new album etc

[Burn]

But how many of those actually smash? 99 percent of the music is forgotten the same day they are released. Recent examples bring Harlequin, Disease etc