Robyn. Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Nowadays we get to have endless music for a very reasonable price per month. It's by far the most profitable option for a music consumer. Do you think streaming will ever go away for another form of music consumption? If so, what? I don't see it to be honest. Did we get to the last era of how we consume music? 1
Kern Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago I feel like the streaming may become either free eventually or more expensive since artists are not profiting from it almost at all
LovingDays Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago I've honestly thought about this alot. I think someone in the future will invent something that takes out streaming, just like every medium before was taken out by its newer, better, more convinient version.
piotrert Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago final form will be brain stimulus, bypassing ears altogether. you could experience two songs simultaneously. but either way it's still some kind of streaming 3
smartalek22 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago A chip implant into your brain that transfers information (including music) would still be a form of streaming so yes 1
Aston Martin Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago The development of future technology is too unpredictable to say for sure imo. If you told anyone in the 1980s that buying physical music would one day become very niche, they wouldn't believe you. s/n: it's kind of crazy that the digital era only ended up lasting a few years. Physical media was the primary form of music consumption for decades, and streaming's been the primary form for at least a decade at this point. But the reign of digital sales only ended up lasting a few years.
Solaria Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Yes, but I do think it will become more expensive in the future. Wouldn't be surprised if artists are gonna start bundling albums together for a price which will give you unlimited streaming access.
Robyn. Posted 2 hours ago Author Posted 2 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Aston Martin said: s/n: it's kind of crazy that the digital era only ended up lasting a few years. Physical media was the primary form of music consumption for decades, and streaming's been the primary form for at least a decade at this point. But the reign of digital sales only ended up lasting a few years. Yeah, that's exactly it. Streaming is already outlasting the digital age, and it has been by far the most profitable option for the consumers out of all the transitions, so I don't see how we go from here.
Robyn. Posted 2 hours ago Author Posted 2 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Solaria said: Yes, but I do think it will become more expensive in the future. Wouldn't be surprised if artists are gonna start bundling albums together for a price which will give you unlimited streaming access. I doubt that would slide, because consumers are used to having unlimited streaming access. Why would they agree to go back to a more restricted consumption? It'd be the death of streaming.
NEX Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 11 minutes ago, Aston Martin said: The development of future technology is too unpredictable to say for sure imo. If you told anyone in the 1980s that buying physical music would one day become very niche, they wouldn't believe you. s/n: it's kind of crazy that the digital era only ended up lasting a few years. Physical media was the primary form of music consumption for decades, and streaming's been the primary form for at least a decade at this point. But the reign of digital sales only ended up lasting a few years. Digital also lasted about a decade though. Plus you need to take into account p2p sharing/pirating into the digital age, which was what ended the physical era, not iTunes.
jezebelvictoria Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Yes and I wish it would've came sooner. I wasted so much money buying CDs in my teens. I regret it. I had over 1000 CDs at one point just to end up throwing them all away.
MatiRod Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago It's going to get more expensive, slowly but surely. It's not sustainable at current prices. Like, I know it sucks to hear as a music fan, but think about it. You're getting access to basically all music ever for like $120 a year. It used to cost $20 just to buy a single album back in the day. 1
Robyn. Posted 2 hours ago Author Posted 2 hours ago 8 minutes ago, jezebelvictoria said: Yes and I wish it would've came sooner. I wasted so much money buying CDs in my teens. I regret it. I had over 1000 CDs at one point just to end up throwing them all away. I mean, you got the experience of it, why would you regret it? Sure, you wouldn't do it now, but back then I'd assume it felt gratifying to collect your favorite music. 3
Abracadabra Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago I'm not sold on the idea of brain chips for streaming music etc, it's giving people in 1975 who thought there would be flying cars by the year 2000.
unclefloprry Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago For now, yep. Portability is one of the main reasons why music consumption has changed over time and these days we've got everything in one device. I think the only way record labels could end the streaming era, due to their greed, is doing what they do with movies: creating music services that only include their own catalog and removing it from other platforms
Robyn. Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago 10 minutes ago, MatiRod said: It's going to get more expensive, slowly but surely. It's not sustainable at current prices. Like, I know it sucks to hear as a music fan, but think about it. You're getting access to basically all music ever for like $120 a year. It used to cost $20 just to buy a single album back in the day. I doubt that the prices would go THAT up. We live in an era where consumers are vocal more than ever. That would be like giving something and taking it back, why would you accept worse than you had? I feel like that would eventually drive the consumers back to pirating music if the prices were to ever rise immensely.
MatiRod Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 6 minutes ago, Robyn. said: I doubt that the prices would go THAT up. We live in an era where consumers are vocal more than ever. That would be like giving something and taking it back, why would you accept worse than you had? I feel like that would eventually drive the consumers back to pirating music if the prices were to ever rise immensely. Not nearly that high but I could see a premium Spotify subscription costing $30+ per month within 10 years
Popboi. Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Yes, but the market will change to different platforms, price etc
stars Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Not sure I agree with all the takes on high prices here. Sure, inflation plays a role, but one of the main reasons streaming took off in the first place was because the music industry needed to compete with piracy. If they push prices too high, music piracy is going to skyrocket again—and this time, it might be even worse since most people would rather stream than pay full price for an album. For now though, streaming isn't going anywhere. You're getting access to millions of songs for a fraction of what you'd spend on an album at a record store. 1
BGKC Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) In the very distant future, I can imagine AI personifying one's music taste to formulate new music exclusively suited for you. Be it a streaming service or a musical generator separate from streaming. So like the lead vocals of Whitney on a sexy mid-tempo track featuring Beyoncé. Streaming and new music would still be a thing (in order to gather your musical taste), but I wouldn't be surprised if there's some sort of musical generator that creates music for you, ultimately crushing the profitability of new artists (unfortunately). Edited 1 hour ago by BGKC
Princess Aurora Posted 55 minutes ago Posted 55 minutes ago It'll become more expensive but AI will make it more interesting. Expect AI Covers to become the standard
Robyn. Posted 37 minutes ago Author Posted 37 minutes ago 45 minutes ago, stars said: Not sure I agree with all the takes on high prices here. Sure, inflation plays a role, but one of the main reasons streaming took off in the first place was because the music industry needed to compete with piracy. If they push prices too high, music piracy is going to skyrocket again—and this time, it might be even worse since most people would rather stream than pay full price for an album. For now though, streaming isn't going anywhere. You're getting access to millions of songs for a fraction of what you'd spend on an album at a record store. Exactly, you can't put on high prices on a service that has been cheap for years, without it driving your consumers away.
tjspy Posted 14 minutes ago Posted 14 minutes ago Radio will be coming back and ending streaming due to nostalgia! q
Recommended Posts