Walk_Away21 Posted Tuesday at 06:14 PM Posted Tuesday at 06:14 PM 12 hours ago, RoseGold said: It's funny how subjective that is because in my opinion, she's not a very emotive singer. She's an amazingly gifted and technically profound one, but I've never been moved by her vocals. Doesn't take anything away from her, though. Sadly I kinda feel this and why I haven't stanned since My December :/ Because of You was IT. I hope her next record is good.
Lightbringer007 Posted Tuesday at 06:22 PM Posted Tuesday at 06:22 PM 11 hours ago, Miles. said: Ironic. Kelly herself is guilty of this, which is why her Kellyoke covers rarely match up to the originals girl be fr now ...
UnusualBoy Posted Tuesday at 06:27 PM Posted Tuesday at 06:27 PM Not people claiming Kelly is emotionless Some of her covers may be questionable but girl knows how to emote. 1
ATRL Moderator MissedTheTrain Posted Tuesday at 06:34 PM ATRL Moderator Posted Tuesday at 06:34 PM 7 minutes ago, Luckitty said: the taylor shade Taylor isn't a world class vocalist or anything, but I think she's always done really well with emoting and putting personality into what she sings. Even as far back as Fearless, that's something she's gotten praise for; you believe the earnestness of what she's singing. That's one thing that makes 1989 so great, her charisma is fully in the vocal performances on the record. 1
Kamil24 Posted Tuesday at 09:01 PM Posted Tuesday at 09:01 PM She can say it The way there were no dry eyes in the room by the end!
EnterTheAttic Posted Tuesday at 10:13 PM Posted Tuesday at 10:13 PM Not all of you clueless people say Kelly Brianne THEE Clarkson cannot emote? One note and our collective hearts are more shattered than Nicole Scherzinger's chances of getting that Tony now. 1
Recommended Posts