base talk Edit war over the JFAD's overall reception on Wikipedia

[GentleDance]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joker:_Folie_à_Deux&action=history

Edited 2 hours ago by GentleDance

[West Coast]

war over a job position is needed

[Sergi91]

The monsters need a job and accept reality 

[SoldierofLove]

Not a Wikipedia edit war 

 

[GentleDance]

 

[nsst]

@ LittleMonsters 

[Space Cowboy]

How is this even up for debate? 33% on RT, 31% audience score, 45 in metacritic, D in cinemascore (worst rating ever for a cb film).
 

This mess of a movie is the very definition of negative reception. 

[suburbannature]

Just now, GentleDance said:

 

@Doctor Dick fighting for his life 

 

 

[Pavement Princess]

I just know there's a gaggle of gays sitting on a couch right now taking breaks between music videos on the living room TV furiously editing that Wikipedia page right now. And I love that for them.

[Capris Groove]

Wait, isn't it 4 points lower than 143? Which says:

 

 

So that means it's negative, full stop.

[Johnny Cash]

Just type "panned" gurl

[narid]

There's nothing mixed about it.

[Smarticle]

OGHs having a stan war over wikipedia

[byzantium]

Go edit Israel's page instead.

[Galah]

There was one over whether or not Harlequin counts as a studio album or soundtrack album too.  Elle Emms are really doing any and everything in their power to cover up and distance Gaga from this disaster.

[SweetenerNostalgia]

33% on rotten tomatoes means that less than half of the reviews are positive, therefore the reception is clearly negative not mixed

 

 

[Rihinvention]

I wonder what the audience score would be if it hadn't been skewed by the Monsters who've given it 5 stars, or 4 stars to make it seem slightly less biased.