réveuse Posted September 24 Posted September 24 (edited) He is right and he should say it! Edited September 24 by réveuse 1
byzantium Posted September 24 Posted September 24 They already do support segregation. I have a hard time imagining people supporting ethnic cleaning, rape and genocide, but drawing the line at slavery. 4
Sazare Posted September 24 Posted September 24 n I know someone who owns his books who's pro-Irael (also owning Noa Tishby books ) Can only imagine how they'll respond to this
Wicked Posted September 24 Posted September 24 He's right. They would hate abolitionists, they'd call John Brown a terrorist and Nat Turner "unhinged" for fighting for his freedom. In fact take it out of the US even. These people today have nothing but negative things to say about the Haitian revolution because it was an order from the great Dessalines to kill all white people (regardless of age or gender) on sight. (Polish Haitians were excluded from this because they helped to kill slave owners ) 3
ClashAndBurn Posted September 24 Posted September 24 5 hours ago, on the line said: It's probably true though. It certainly is. Kamala Harris did famously go after the most notorious Zionist of all time for being a segregationist who opposed integrated busing five years ago. His name? Why it was Joe Biden of course
on the line Posted September 24 Posted September 24 6 hours ago, ClashAndBurn said: It certainly is. Kamala Harris did famously go after the most notorious Zionist of all time for being a segregationist who opposed integrated busing five years ago. His name? Why it was Joe Biden of course SO edgy!
Samsara Posted October 1 Posted October 1 Only if you equate Israel as a Western nation vying for Western supremacy while completely ignoring the nuanced historical context and geopolitical circumstances that shaped this conflict. This is a case of oversimplification of a complex issue and an example of false analogy. The Israel-Palestine conflict is not a simple case of racial domination or colonialism. It involves a clash of nationalisms, histories, and competing claims over land. People who support Israel come from a wide range of backgrounds and political ideologies. Why is the concept of an entire Islamic region not a concern for you, yet the existence of a tiny, sovereign Jewish nation fighting to survive in a hostile environment becomes such a significant issue? Yes, nothing but pure antisemitism. 1 1 6
Cyanide Posted October 1 Posted October 1 14 hours ago, Samsara said: Only if you equate Israel as a Western nation vying for Western supremacy while completely ignoring the nuanced historical context and geopolitical circumstances that shaped this conflict. This is a case of oversimplification of a complex issue and an example of false analogy. The Israel-Palestine conflict is not a simple case of racial domination or colonialism. It involves a clash of nationalisms, histories, and competing claims over land. People who support Israel come from a wide range of backgrounds and political ideologies. Why is the concept of an entire Islamic region not a concern for you, yet the existence of a tiny, sovereign Jewish nation fighting to survive in a hostile environment becomes such a significant issue? Yes, nothing but pure antisemitism. And the pro slavery/segregationist people would talk condescendingly like this and say stuff like "you don't support the manifest destiny and the God-given right of the white man to prosper?! You're racist!"
Ghiles Posted October 1 Posted October 1 (edited) 20 hours ago, Samsara said: The Israel-Palestine conflict is not a simple case of racial domination or colonialism. It is. Israel's actions in the occupied territories ensure the complete domination of one group (jewish israelis) over another (palestinians) and the international court of justice confirmed that Israel is violating the apartheid convention. in the ICJ's words, Israel is guilty of both apartheid and colonialism. the very creation of the state of Israel in 1948 was achieved through the uprooting of an indigenous population by violent terrorist militias (haganah, irgoun, lehi) going on a terror spree, burning to the ground over 600 villages, killing 15,000+ and displacing over 750,000+. This mass expulsion, called the Nakba, is well documented by Israeli historians like Ilan Pappe. Read up about the Deir Yassin and Tantura massacres. Settler colonialism was always the goal. Zionists like Ben Gurion ("We must expel arabs and take their places") and Theodor Herzl ("We shall try to spirit the penniless population across the border by procuring employment for it in the transit countries, while denying it employment in our own country") were always vocal about their plan to colonize Palestine and they were only able to achieve their dream ethnostate thanks to the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians and sustain it by oppression and continuous denial of their rights. Edited October 1 by Ghiles 2
family.guy123 Posted October 8 Posted October 8 (edited) Those whose support of Israel hinges on a $20,000 payoff would have supported slavery and the Holocaust. Edited October 8 by family.guy123
Recommended Posts