Jump to content

Joker: FAD to lose $150-200M, one of the biggest box office bombs ever


Recommended Posts

Posted

Can't even call it a shaky opening, this is an earthquake

  • Haha 14

  • Replies 2.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Assassin

    92

  • Doctor Dick

    45

  • V$.

    42

  • shyboi

    41

Posted
26 minutes ago, Breathe On Moi said:

didn't the Twister (remake) that dropped a few months back literally shatter box office #s? hm

no not really, it opened with $80M. it just cost a lot less to make. 

Posted
24 minutes ago, narid said:

She appears about 15mins into the movie, and is present all the way through. 


The narrative that she's barely in is just liddos lying as a coping mechanism. 

33 mins of screentime in a 2h 18min movie lol 

Posted
46 minutes ago, Assassin said:

$40M is out the window, HALP

 

 

This is so tragic :deadbanana2:

Posted (edited)
23 minutes ago, HonourableVomit said:

33 mins of screentime in a 2h 18min movie lol 

Meryl had 28.5 mins of screentime in Devil Wears Prada, FYI and she was a lead.

Edited by Assassin
  • Like 4
  • Thanks 10
Posted
3 minutes ago, Assassin said:

Meryl had less screentime at 28.5 mins in Devil Wears Prada, FYI and she was a lead.

Wait what :deadbanana4: TIL

 

Meryl Streep ha power :clap3:

Posted
1 hour ago, Assassin said:

$40M is out the window, HALP

 

 

:hoetenks:

  • Haha 1
Posted

D cinemascore :deadbanana:

lower than Madame web, borderlands, megalopolis, Morbius.. Hell could be lowest for any comic book movie EVER :deadbanana:

the first one breaking all the good records and this one breaking all the bad records is quite something

  • Haha 12
Posted

With the terrible cinema score, this is truly becoming a debacle. NOTHING redeeming about it whatsoever. 

Posted

I mean, discussing the narrative how much or how little Gaga is in the movie isn't really targeting the problem. A quick sweep at the reviews shows that neither her or Joaquin's performances are what's bringing the film down. :skull: But I understand ATRL-ism's and looking for easy drags. But in seriousness I think it's just a case of the movie just sucks, bad writing and script and I don't know why Todd Phillips or anyone at Warner Bros. for that matter thought an appropriate follow-up to Joker, considering the audience it targeted in 2019, was a musical. :michael:

 

A swing and a miss. Everyone involved will live though.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted

So; only 2nd movie post covid to get a score as low as this

lower than cats (2019) too

lowest for any DC/Marvel project

possibly lowest for a blockbuster ever

 

the Liddos that are polled probably kept this from an F cinemascore but at least then it would join a memorable category :deadbanana: now it's just a disaster without any of the benefits a disaster might bring.

 

this isn't going to gross domestically more than the original did in its opening weekend and it could very likely end up below 200M; aka the budget of the movie without marketing

 

  • Like 3
Posted

UNDER $40 mil OMG. PANNED BOMB. :deadbanana4:

Posted
23 minutes ago, Navyofbadgals said:

D cinemascore :deadbanana:

lower than Madame web, borderlands, megalopolis, Morbius.. Hell could be lowest for any comic book movie EVER :deadbanana:

the first one breaking all the good records and this one breaking all the bad records is quite something

@Kukai GET IN HERE

  • Haha 3
Posted

Wow. I have to update this thread almost every hour because the numbers keep dropping. We've started with 75M then it was 60M then it was 50M later it was 45M and now it's less than 40M. This is probably the biggest flop in comic book adaptations. :rip:

  • Haha 12
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
Quote

The film made $7 million from Monday–Friday night previews, down from the first's $13.3 milion (-46%). 

 

Source

Posted

I've been liking all of @Kukai's recent posts. The Nostradamus of our time should be awarded! 

  • Haha 6
Posted
7 hours ago, Gaia said:

I just checked the IMAX showing at my local theater and there's literally 10% seats sold :bibliahh:

It's about 60% full for every showing after 2pm at mine 

 

IMG-6807.jpg

Posted

I watched it last night… and I did not enjoy. 
 

:suburban:
 

I will say, Gaga really is fantastic but she's given barely anything to work with. Her character has no agency… 

 

She'll be fine (Gaga is still a hugely respected megastar) but yeah… there's no way to spin it. This is a bomb.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Peroxide said:

I watched it last night… and I did not enjoy. 
 

:suburban:
 

I will say, Gaga really is fantastic but she's given barely anything to work with. Her character has no agency… 

 

She'll be fine (Gaga is still a hugely respected megastar) but yeah… there's no way to spin it. This is a bomb.

She literally didn't even get a single solo bombastic music number. What a waste.

Posted (edited)

So they are gonna gross $200mm thats cool they are going to recover the money and WB are going to destroy the musicals script from the future, thank you Gaga 💘

Edited by Infinite
  • Haha 4
Posted
6 minutes ago, Infinite said:

So they are gonna gross $200mm thats cool they are going to recover the money and WB are going to destroy the musicals script from the future, thank you Gaga 💘

There are indirect costs that may not be reflected directly in the budget. They need to earn at least 500 million for the film to be considered more or less successful.

Posted
6 hours ago, HonourableVomit said:

33 mins of screentime in a 2h 18min movie lol 

Whew! Only a lead actress.

  • Haha 2
Posted

Omg this is really her artpop era

:suburban:

  • Haha 3
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Bends said:

There are indirect costs that may not be reflected directly in the budget. They need to earn at least 500 million for the film to be considered more or less successful.

How on heart that movie would cost 200 millions ? It have like 3 sets and the people that worked there are the same as the Joker 1 i was being sarcastic because i don't belive that "200million stuff" it's not realistic.

Edited by Infinite
  • Haha 4
Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, LadyFlopga said:

Omg this is really her artpop era

:suburban:

So she is going to recover again, she always do , and whats wrong with your username and why You are not banned?

Edited by Infinite
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.