Jump to content

Joker: FAD to lose $150-200M, one of the biggest box office bombs ever


Recommended Posts

Posted

Not it actually turning into a FAD. The signs were there 

 

:bibliahh:

  • Haha 1

  • Replies 2.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Assassin

    92

  • Doctor Dick

    45

  • V$.

    42

  • shyboi

    41

Posted

From $100M prediction from the liddos down to $44M

 

That has to be a record! 

  • Haha 5
Posted
35 minutes ago, Blue Monday said:

I don't know who woke up and decided to let him play auteur dress up but the man does NOT have the juice; the first Joker was a Scorsese rip off that fooled the average person into thinking he had any substance to speak off, but I think JFAD is going to prove to people he's a fraud 

I mean the Hangover franchise already proved that. He sucks at telling original stories.

 

As you said the first one is just Scorsese dress up with the Joker/DC brand slapped on it. If they had to make a sequel, he probably should've ripped off Bonnie & Clyde next. It still wouldn't have touched the original which is a lighting in a bottle type success but would've probably faired better than whatever the **** this is.

Posted

The way the opening numbers DECREASE every time I scroll past this thread :rip:. The moment it was announced it would be a musical, I knew it was done for.

  • Like 2
Posted

Her golden raspberry is on the way

:xtinass:

Posted
2 hours ago, Pikacho said:

At least there's still Die with a Smile. A huge ww song because of her name alone.

spacer.png

  • Haha 5
Posted

LIVE from the planet Chromatica: 

 

spacer.png

  • Haha 3
Posted
2 hours ago, Pikacho said:

At least there's still Die with a Smile. A huge ww song because of her name alone.

I thought I had posted this at first.

  • Haha 4
Posted
34 minutes ago, Dei said:

would this be the biggest superhero bomb of all time? i can't believe it's not even gonna exceed the marvels in the US :rip:

The Marvels cost almost 100 million more to make than this movie so no it wouldnt be. 

Posted

Why didn't Bruno play the Joker ? Bad choice. 

  • Haha 12
Posted

I know this thread is a Gaga circlejerk atm but can the movie people actually talk for a sec. Do y'all find it interesting that this might be yet ANOTHER 2019 sequel that underperforms? We've had Shazam, Aquaman, The Marvels, now possibly Joker 2. Also I think Mufasa is gonna bomb too. I just find it interesting. I feel like all of these movies took WAY too long to come out. 

Posted

After seeing it last night... screening it at Venice was a mistake. That killed hype. The movie just isn't as strong as what it could have been. A shame. Someone else should have wrote it with Phillips directing. 

Posted
2 hours ago, orange22 said:

Maybe she can book the next Adam Sandler movie or something 

 

spacer.png

not as her love interest tho, that's usually reserved for very beautiful actresses who are clearly out of his league

  • Haha 3
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, Assassin said:

All those had much smaller budgets though.

It has to be The Marvels. That budget got mega inflated with Covid and then reshoots brougt it up to 270 mil. It got inflated from a 130m budget to 270 and made less than 200m WW. 

Posted

44 now? Wasn't it at 50ish a couple days ago? :rip: 

Posted

They should've cast Ava Max :ghostface:

  • Haha 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, ALA said:

After seeing it last night... screening it at Venice was a mistake. That killed hype. The movie just isn't as strong as what it could have been. A shame. Someone else should have wrote it with Phillips directing. 

I honestly think the only major mistake with the movie is that there's a few too many musical sequences (the diegetic ones) that could have been axed or just cut down. I felt like this was a step up for the movie because the supporting cast actually had **** to do and weren't just props to make Arthur's life more miserable. All of the big musical numbers were great and actually made sense for this version of The Joker imo. I don't wanna say much here tho bc spoiler culture ruins stuff for people. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

What a shaky start. Kukai was ahead of her time

Fkn6r6J.gif

Edited by AvadaKedavra
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, getBusy said:

44 now? Wasn't it at 50ish a couple days ago? :rip: 

How does that one Kesha and Pitbull song go again?

 

  • Haha 4
Posted
23 minutes ago, Gossip_Boy said:

I mean the Hangover franchise already proved that. He sucks at telling original stories.

 

As you said the first one is just Scorsese dress up with the Joker/DC brand slapped on it. If they had to make a sequel, he probably should've ripped off Bonnie & Clyde next. It still wouldn't have touched the original which is a lighting in a bottle type success but would've probably faired better than whatever the **** this is.

The many members of the Academy of Motions Pictures Arts and Sciences didn't get the memo, hopefully they will this go around. I actually thought this was going to be a bit of a Bonnie & Clyde type two-hander considering all of the noise around Gaga's involvement. Come to find out she's not in the movie much at all :dies:

Posted

Gaga is mimicking a Katy Perry career shift

  • Haha 3
Posted

Not the album already dropping down to #17 on the US Apple Music Chart :rip:

  • Haha 2
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.