SharGaga Posted Thursday at 06:53 PM Share Posted Thursday at 06:53 PM She's finally showing the nipples. Good for her. It just sucks that the music isn't matching the visuals. Grown up visuals with kid bopz music. I guess sooner or later this is was gonna happen since she can't evolve her music. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raiden Posted Thursday at 07:02 PM Share Posted Thursday at 07:02 PM (edited) 23 hours ago, Bosque said: What is the point of showing your boobs on a radio show? That's the first thing I thought. I was like wait, nobody saw it. She inadvertently gave the host/dj a private session. Edited Thursday at 07:05 PM by Raiden Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Letemtalk Posted Friday at 11:42 AM Share Posted Friday at 11:42 AM My first thoughts: nice boobies Second thoughts: (near) naked boobs on a radio show? Third thoughts: she has the right to do a super sexual era with themes of female empowerment if she wants to. Forth thoughts: something seems a bit off here and @Communion pretty much covered it all here. On 6/27/2024 at 2:27 PM, Communion said: It has nothing to do with what she has a right or not to do. She as a woman can do whatever she wants with her body and should feel entitled to do so. Such however doesn't excuse her from the reality that launching a new era off of a kind of pop hyper-sexuality is going to draw feelings of discomfort when the main name attached to the project is a man accused of rape and who has made it his thing to produce really hyper-sexual pop for women, particularly young women. Does female pop hyper-sexuality still remain progressive when it's done for the benefit of men who are accused of being sexual predators? Why do so many projects Dr. Luke finds himself associated with end up being so hyper-sexual? What intentions is the listener meant to assume when seeing his name in the credits? Are the constant reminders of his name next to displays of female sexuality meant to somehow make us forget allegations of sexual violence? Let alone.. what market was there even for **** Pop: Oblivia from Katy Perry? There have been a lot of successful eras over the last 10 years and most of them were not dependant on the skills of Dr. Luke. We know that some people in the industry seem to have welcomed him back. He was even nominated for an AOTY Grammy a few years ago. But if you compare with other women who have worked with him, Doja Cat was in a prior contract and while I don't wish to make excuses for Kim, she might have found it difficult as a trans woman to find good producers who would work for her. But what is Katy's excuse? She can't be short of cash after all her income from music, television shows and endorsements. In just the last few weeks we learnt that she will be paid 6 million dollars for singing at a billionaires wedding. Surely when you reach a certain level of wealth and success, you are mostly thinking about your legacy? This probably isn't going to help her legacy as much as she might think. Edit: Forbes estimates her net wealth is more than $350 million. Does she expect a Grammy for working with Luke? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoAngelus Posted Friday at 07:47 PM Share Posted Friday at 07:47 PM Why is she doing this... she doesn't have to She was one of the rare ones who wasn't getting naked, now we only have beyonce and taylor not exposing themselves... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SinnerCity Posted Friday at 07:59 PM Share Posted Friday at 07:59 PM I'm sorry but this is such a trashy and attention seeking behaviour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thin White Duke Posted Friday at 08:07 PM Share Posted Friday at 08:07 PM She could have given us fresh slutty milf bangers but instead decided to work with a rapist on "women's empowerment" music. Go figure. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tistotal Posted Friday at 08:12 PM Share Posted Friday at 08:12 PM that tweet has almost a half of a million of likes, that's why haters are fuming Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SinnerCity Posted Friday at 08:36 PM Share Posted Friday at 08:36 PM 24 minutes ago, Tistotal said: that tweet has almost a half of a million of likes, that's why haters are fuming Is that right? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soda Pop Queen Posted yesterday at 05:51 AM Share Posted yesterday at 05:51 AM One thing about Katheryn is she's always had a great rack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts