Almodusa Posted June 26 Posted June 26 6 minutes ago, kellebrity98 said: Truth Hurts by Lizzo was released in 2017 but got many grammy nom in 2020… Yeah it being allowed in was dumb, but I guess it got in because it (the rule) also says "or when a song gained prominence" 5 minutes ago, MALAMENTE said: They mean it is not eligible for next year's Grammys Yeah her label could've waited a week and then it'd be eligible for next year
Katamari Posted June 26 Posted June 26 Just now, KatyPrismSpirit said: I think it's very odd that Anitta got in BNA in 2023 despite Versions of Me being her 6th full length album and debuting in like 2009-2010? Same goes with Victoria Monét who also dropped 6 projects prior to Jaguar II and debuting in like 2013? (and her breakthrough moment was like 1/10th of the success Sabrina has now) they never submitted previously that seems to be the main criteria
Assassin Posted June 26 Posted June 26 Isn't Sabrina on her SIXTH album?? Grammys BNA rules never make any sense. 1
Paultea Posted June 26 Posted June 26 10 minutes ago, Almodusa said: That was made up by a fan. It was eligible and simply didn't get enough votes. I think they just mean it wasn't eligible in the year it actually blew up in. Greedy didn't reach Top 25 until October 2nd. Grammy noms came out November 10th. It would be really hard for a pop song that came out the last day of eligibility to get noticed enough and get nominated that quickly, even though it was submitted.
KatyPrismSpirit Posted June 26 Author Posted June 26 2 minutes ago, Katamari said: they never submitted previously that seems to be the main criteria i get that, but people keep throwing the argument that sabrina dropped 6 albums already
Almodusa Posted June 26 Posted June 26 (edited) 27 minutes ago, Paultea said: It would be really hard for a pop song that came out the last day of eligibility to get noticed enough and get nominated that quickly, even though it was submitted. Very true, especially if the artist isn't that popular. Olivia released Guts a week before that cutoff but no shock she still managed to get all those nominations regardless. Edited June 26 by Almodusa
Illuminati Posted June 26 Posted June 26 3 minutes ago, KatyPrismSpirit said: i get that, but people keep throwing the argument that sabrina dropped 6 albums already I feel like in general established artists like that, Anitta or Sabrina shouldn't be eligible. Like how are you gonna call yourself a new artist when your debut came out a decade ago Kinda embarrassing 1
Paultea Posted June 26 Posted June 26 5 minutes ago, Almodusa said: Very true, especially if the artist isn't that popular. Olivia released Sour a week before that cutoff but no shock she still managed to get all those nominations regardless. Right, if this was her comeback single after a big era then I think it would have had a chance. Especially if it debuted top 10. It's kinda funny though because I would say Sabrina was way more well known than Tate before 2023, yet Sabrina will be the one eligible.
Katamari Posted June 26 Posted June 26 9 minutes ago, KatyPrismSpirit said: i get that, but people keep throwing the argument that sabrina dropped 6 albums already Teah but They changed it so amount of albums previously released don't matter If you have a breakthrough and hadn't previously submitted with the later being the main disqualifier i didnt know the amount of times matter tho I thought it was just one and done. But apparently you can submit up to three times
Illuminati Posted June 26 Posted June 26 3 minutes ago, LatinFreak said: Isnt that award cursed anyways? Only because by definition you have to be kinda a khia to win it. Billie wasn't cursed
Eóghan Posted June 26 Posted June 26 it's kinda ridiculous, especially since Tate is 5 years younger than Chappell/Sabrina and has been hustling to get success for a far less amount of time. yet she's disqualified to get nominated for that category forever
KatyPrismSpirit Posted June 26 Author Posted June 26 6 minutes ago, LatinFreak said: Isnt that award cursed anyways? recent winners Victoria Monét: curse? idk Samara Joy: idk her Olivia Rodrigo: def not cursed Megan Thee Stallion: cursed tbh Billie Eilish: not cursed Dua Lipa: debatable after RO 1
LatinFreak Posted June 26 Posted June 26 Just now, KatyPrismSpirit said: recent winners Victoria Monét: curse? idk Samara Joy: idk her Olivia Rodrigo: def not cursed Megan Thee Stallion: cursed tbh Billie Eilish: not cursed Dua Lipa: debatable after RO
georgechxng Posted June 26 Posted June 26 (edited) 58 minutes ago, Trent W said: They should honestly just delete that category or renamed to best new breakthrough act Cause it's just embarrassing Even if chappell or sabrina win it would be embarrassing for them since they've been around for a long time one is not like the other. chappell's debut album only came out last year. before that, she had an ep in 2017 that she released by herself but that was it. all the songs she has been releasing since 2020 ended up being part of her first album. you can't really compare her to sabrina who's been releasing multiple albums through a major label ever since 2015. Edited June 26 by georgechxng 3
ImpressMeMuch Posted June 26 Posted June 26 came here to make a joke about Sabrina taking it and..... she's eligible? wtf 1
americanlife Posted June 26 Posted June 26 2 hours ago, kellebrity98 said: chappell releasing music for 7 years and sabrina has like 5 albums out. i love all of them but this is bs and don't make sense… also she has 2 albums out, so how 3? Chappell's first album has only been out for under a year. Sabrina has a ton of albums and singles, and Tate has a couple albums and several hit singles. If Tate's ineligible, Sabrina should also be ineligible. Chappell's been around for a while but she should qualify since she's still a relatively new artist in terms of success and having only one full length project out. 1
laqqinq Posted June 26 Posted June 26 I don't know if some here read what it said. Regardless of how many albums or singles, if the artist is "breaking through" in the industry and has submitted three times, then they won't be eligible; if they have submitted an entry less than three times, they can enter. The moment they submit the third time, it is their last chance. But the criterion of what is considered as a "breakout" and everything varies from artist to artist. Regardless, Tate McRae should've at least got a nomination at the 2024 ceremony. 1
Zyill Posted June 26 Posted June 26 They need to just rename the category to "Breakout Artist" so we can stop having the same stale conversation every year 1 2
OnlyManInTheWorld Posted June 26 Posted June 26 Why are they even considering Sabrina a "new artist"?
americanlife Posted June 26 Posted June 26 (edited) Sabrina has been releasing albums for nearly 10 years at this point. Ever since then, she's had the occasional moderate hit and she's had a small dedicated fanbase. That's not someone that should be eligible for best NEW artist. If anything, she could've been nominated for the previous Grammy's after The Eras Tour and Nonsense breakthrough. Chappell Roan is still a new artist since she only has ONE album and gained all this acclaim and recognition less than 6 months ago. THAT is a NEW artist. Sabrina has been around for a while now, even if she didn't have smash hits. She's been known in the industry as a singer and FORMER DISNEY STAR for several years, that is not a new artist. Edited June 26 by americanlife 1
Luckitty Posted June 26 Posted June 26 sabrina has been releasing music since tate was 10 years old but somehow sabrina is eligible and tate isn't
laqqinq Posted June 26 Posted June 26 13 minutes ago, Luckitty said: sabrina has been releasing music since tate was 10 years old but somehow sabrina is eligible and tate isn't Tate already submitted three times (the limit). Sabrina didn't lol. 1
laqqinq Posted June 26 Posted June 26 15 minutes ago, americanlife said: Sabrina has been releasing albums for nearly 10 years at this point. Ever since then, she's had the occasional moderate hit and she's had a small dedicated fanbase. That's not someone that should be eligible for best NEW artist. If anything, she could've been nominated for the previous Grammy's after The Eras Tour and Nonsense breakthrough. Chappell Roan is still a new artist since she only has ONE album and gained all this acclaim and recognition less than 6 months ago. THAT is a NEW artist. Sabrina has been around for a while now, even if she didn't have smash hits. She's been known in the industry as a singer and FORMER DISNEY STAR for several years, that is not a new artist. Chappell is eligible to be nominated tho.
Erreur2 La Nature Posted June 26 Posted June 26 The way this award show has become a joke these days is insane lol. That's ridiculous 1
Recommended Posts