kellebrity98 Posted June 26 Posted June 26 (edited) chappell releasing music for 7 years and sabrina has like 5 albums out. i love all of them but this is bs and don't make sense… also she has 2 albums out, so how 3? Edited June 26 by kellebrity98 2
Popular Post ONOPKA Posted June 26 Popular Post Posted June 26 "best" would have been a stretch anyway 1 24 1 3
tiagol88 Posted June 26 Posted June 26 This literally makes no sense if the other 2 can be nominated 1 9
Almodusa Posted June 26 Posted June 26 The screening committee can still deem Sabrina ineligible for other reasons but we'll see as we get closer
Popular Post State of Grace. Posted June 26 Popular Post Posted June 26 Sabrina having 5 (FIVE!) albums out and still being eligible A shitshow 20 3
Walk_Away21 Posted June 26 Posted June 26 1 minute ago, State of Grace. said: Sabrina having 5 (FIVE!) albums out and still being eligible A shitshow She deserves reparations for Emails being ignored
Popular Post RihannaRTT Posted June 26 Popular Post Posted June 26 Best New Artist is always the MESSIEST category and I just do not understand how all these artists with 10 years in the industry are being called new just bc they underperformed all this time. The 2011-2015 ruleset was the best one imo No previous albums No previous Grammy wins The above actually means the artist is genuinely "new". Them changing it in 2016 has just led to ridiculous nominations and submissions ever since. 16 5
Aston Martin Posted June 26 Posted June 26 If they're going to be super inconsistent with the rules, they may as well just scrap the category and replace it with an Artist of the Year award. 13 1
Bends Posted June 26 Posted June 26 4 minutes ago, RihannaRTT said: being called new just bc they underperformed all this time. It is also necessary to prescribe a clear criterion: as soon as an artist enters the top 10 of the Billboard, he is considered quite "new" to the industry. Such nonsense.
Paultea Posted June 26 Posted June 26 16 minutes ago, kellebrity98 said: chappell releasing music for 7 years and sabrina has like 5 albums out. i love all of them but this is bs and don't make sense… also she has 2 albums out, so how 3? Because her team have already submit her 3 times. Sabrina is lucky she's only been twice.
Trent W Posted June 26 Posted June 26 They should honestly just delete that category or renamed to best new breakthrough act Cause it's just embarrassing Even if chappell or sabrina win it would be embarrassing for them since they've been around for a long time 5 1
UnusualBoy Posted June 26 Posted June 26 That's bullshit, I don't think she was gonna win either way but you know what I mean.
GeminiCat Posted June 26 Posted June 26 3 minutes ago, Paultea said: Because her team have already submit her 3 times. Sabrina is lucky she's only been twice. Between this and then Greedy not being eligible bc they released a day before eligibility period is pure label mismanagement.
Richie.Valdez Posted June 26 Posted June 26 A certain someone is already writing those checks to the grammys for her "daughter". 1 1
Gwendolyn Posted June 26 Posted June 26 They need to change the rules again, it makes 0 sense that artists who have been in the industry for years and have released music get a BNA nomination. 1
Almodusa Posted June 26 Posted June 26 Just now, GeminiCat said: Greedy not being eligible bc they released a day before eligibility period That was made up by a fan. It was eligible and simply didn't get enough votes. 1
kellebrity98 Posted June 26 Posted June 26 Okay, so you have to release an album to be eligible for the category. Tate's debut was released in 2022, in 2023 she released her second album. So she couldn't get a nomination before 2022… she's at 2 max.
kellebrity98 Posted June 26 Posted June 26 3 minutes ago, Almodusa said: That was made up by a fan. It was eligible and simply didn't get enough votes. Truth Hurts by Lizzo was released in 2017 but got many grammy nom in 2020…
MALAMENTE Posted June 26 Posted June 26 3 minutes ago, Almodusa said: That was made up by a fan. It was eligible and simply didn't get enough votes. They mean it is not eligible for next year's Grammys
Illuminati Posted June 26 Posted June 26 I feel like they really need to work on BNA rules, it's so random
KatyPrismSpirit Posted June 26 Author Posted June 26 I think it's very odd that Anitta got in BNA in 2023 despite Versions of Me being her 6th full length album and debuting in like 2009-2010? Same goes with Victoria Monét who also dropped 6 projects prior to Jaguar II and debuting in like 2013? (and her breakthrough moment was like 1/10th of the success Sabrina has now) 1
Recommended Posts