Ramcoro Posted July 13 Posted July 13 Her Instagram reel explaining sarcasm Since haters can't comprehend it. 7
Mattically Posted July 13 Posted July 13 She's a flower, she's a thorn Superhuman, number one She's a sister, she's a mother Open your eyes, just look around and you'll discover, you know I don't care, this part flows and sounds so good, the vocal production is fire. 6
Cheap Thrills 9.0 Posted July 13 Posted July 13 7 minutes ago, Ramcoro said: Her Instagram reel explaining sarcasm Since haters can't comprehend it. We get the sarcasm. Can she explain what happens afterwards tho? Why are the two gay men kissing? Why does she fuel her ass? Why does she break into a random woman's house to take another woman's phone? And why was Trisha Paytas invited? The music video makes no damn sense.
halcyonday Posted July 13 Posted July 13 it still has a chance at being a cute European radio hit, but I hope we're looking at something stronger to reconnect with the audience lifetimes or gimme gimme could be it 1
psychodiva336 Posted July 13 Posted July 13 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Cheap Thrills 9.0 said: We get the sarcasm. Can she explain what happens afterwards tho? Why are the two gay men kissing? Why does she fuel her ass? Why does she break into a random woman's house to take another woman's phone? And why was Trisha Paytas invited? The music video makes no damn sense. I saw someone on X explain that the second part of the video is supposed to be an exaggerated, grotesque vision of what many conservative people would imagine a world run by women to be - chaos, destruction and gays everywhere... As for the other points, my guesses are: Trisha was probably invited for clout, the fueling scene is a reference to gassing yourself up, and I imagine taking the tiktok dancer's lamp is supposed to be Katy reminding the newer generation that she's still here and she has a legacy to her name. Also a cute little detail is that you can see a shark and beach balls in that scene where Katy breaks through the window - a reference to her 2015 superbowl performance Edited July 13 by psychodiva336 8
BlueBlue Posted July 13 Posted July 13 Ok so America is done with her but this still can be cute european hit
Cheap Thrills 9.0 Posted July 13 Posted July 13 4 minutes ago, psychodiva336 said: I saw someone on X explain that the second part of the video is supposed to be an exaggerated, grotesque vision of what many conservative people would imagine a world run by women to be - chaos, destruction and gays everywhere... As for the other points, my guesses are: Trisha was probably invited for clout, the fueling scene is a reference to gassing yourself up, and I imagine taking the tiktok dancer's lamp is supposed to be Katy reminding the newer generation that she's still here and she has a legacy to her name. Also a cute little detail is that you can see a shark and beach balls in that scene where Katy breaks through the window - a reference to her 2015 superbowl performance Oh so she wants to be political. Great. Another Witness era was all we needed. Thanks for the explanation tho. 1
Communion Posted July 13 Posted July 13 6 minutes ago, Cheap Thrills 9.0 said: We get the sarcasm. Can she explain what happens afterwards tho? Why are the two gay men kissing? Why does she fuel her ass? Why does she break into a random woman's house to take another woman's phone? And why was Trisha Paytas invited? The music video makes no damn sense. It's supposed to be 2024 where ~gender politics are now a 180 from 2012~, the world is in chaos, there's bald women, women in suits, homosexual workers in 5-inch inseam shorts, chaos in the streets, fire!!! Katy's attempts at femininity and womanhood feel alien (messily applying makeup while Trisha drives the monster truck) and kids nowadays view breaking the glass ceiling (door) as being a TikToker instead of a Trad Wife! What a weird new world that doesn't know Katy Perry ("who are you?!"). It's just a glossy David LaChapelle photoshoot concept messily put to motion. Like if the 2012 set-up is meant to be satirizing how liberal feminism worked for the male gaze, why is the 2024 version of her with full robotics still sexualized? It would have been interesting if she had played the robotics thing up and not sexualized it. Served Futurama head-in-a-floating-jar teas. And the end just feels like randomly connecting all that comes before to wanting to play into this idea her team has from Capitol interns that she's forgotten and the kids on TikTok want "recession pop" back. 4
Ramcoro Posted July 13 Posted July 13 17 minutes ago, Cheap Thrills 9.0 said: We get the sarcasm. Can she explain what happens afterwards tho? Why are the two gay men kissing? Why does she fuel her ass? Why does she break into a random woman's house to take another woman's phone? And why was Trisha Paytas invited? The music video makes no damn sense. Why not? Lol did you watch Last Friday Night? Sometimes things are chaotic and random. 1
ainadalkaz Posted July 13 Posted July 13 4 minutes ago, Cheap Thrills 9.0 said: Oh so she wants to be political. Great. Another Witness era was all we needed. Thanks for the explanation tho. which goes... completely against what this era was presented as
spree Posted July 13 Posted July 13 49 minutes ago, Slore121 said: Ugh this is such a catchy ear worm! I love it. A pure, fun dance song! It's fantastic! I don't care what the haters say. They're losers. 3
zoom202226 Posted July 13 Posted July 13 17 minutes ago, psychodiva336 said: I saw someone on X explain that the second part of the video is supposed to be an exaggerated, grotesque vision of what many conservative people would imagine a world run by women to be - chaos, destruction and gays everywhere... As for the other points, my guesses are: Trisha was probably invited for clout, the fueling scene is a reference to gassing yourself up, and I imagine taking the tiktok dancer's lamp is supposed to be Katy reminding the newer generation that she's still here and she has a legacy to her name. Also a cute little detail is that you can see a shark and beach balls in that scene where Katy breaks through the window - a reference to her 2015 superbowl performance This concept is great, but the execution is meh. If the song was longer, there could have been more room to tell, idk, a complete/solid story? She rarely fails in that department, so this is surprising for me. 2
psychodiva336 Posted July 13 Posted July 13 5 minutes ago, ainadalkaz said: which goes... completely against what this era was presented as Well it goes without saying that Woman's World is an outlier on an album described as "Empowering, Sexy, Provocative Pop Anthems" 1
Popular Post Lvl8Treeko Posted July 13 Popular Post Posted July 13 The bandwagon hating on Katy is highkey bullying and quite frankly pathetic. It's giving jobless. Twitter is truly a cesspool of uglies. I haven't seen one person with a viral hate tweet that is attractive. The dissecting every frame of the video to find something problematic is so lame. It's a tongue-in-cheek katy perry music video. It was never that serious. Though this seems to happen to her every era. Even during TD era she was critically panned and hated on. I really don't get it. People refuse to lighten up and have fun. regarding the song, while I feel it could be a little longer at first listen, it's really grown on me and the chorus is definitely an earworm! It's not her best but it's nowhere near as bad as people are making it out to be. 5 20 11
Popular Post KatyPrismSpirit Posted July 13 Popular Post Posted July 13 Sorry but the song is still a bop despite the repetitive lyrics. can't deny it anymore. 15
TeemoR Posted July 13 Posted July 13 The fact that she copied Stupid Love and managed to create a worse song....and that with Dr. Luke's help....it's like she did all of this on purpose lol. 5 6
zoom202226 Posted July 13 Posted July 13 365, NRO, and HIH. She could serve pop excellence if she wanted to, but I sincerely believe she only released this song to generate buzz. It's not working the way they might have expected, so they should start rush-releasing the next single. 3
BlueBlue Posted July 13 Posted July 13 This era is so messy already and we are before Kim Petras collab Spoiler I love Kim Petras tbh. I'm hyped about this collab
AlleeX Posted July 13 Posted July 13 4 hours ago, Nova_23 said: He's not facing consequences because people like Katy Perry continue to work with him. His reputation is tarnished and trashed. His only chance at coming back is to have artists like Katy back him and release music with him. If artists didn't work with him then he'd be paying some consequences for his behavior although it's nothing because he should be in jail. The court system obviously failed but that's a topic for a different day. The way someone like him pays for his actions (since the court system failed) is for him to be shunned from the industry and not have people work with him which for the most part has happened but when an artist decides to work with him then of course that artist is going to get crap thrown their way. This is the best answer I've seen recently. Yes, the system is unfair, but as A WOMAN, in a non-woman's world, working with that man is the second worst thing that you can do next to actually being a perpetrator. What was the plan if the song was to smash? To be happy and contempt knowing that you have made that man hundreds of thousands of dollars, and opened the door for other artists to potenitally say, hey, well, why don't I work with him again? Maybe he's not what people say he is, etc. Vile, desperate, success-hungry move. I'm enjoying the backlash more with every passing day. 3
Erotic Posted July 13 Posted July 13 (edited) She would be smart to pivot to a euro sound and try to manage somewhat of a lite Kylie type career Edited July 13 by Erotic 3
AlleeX Posted July 13 Posted July 13 3 hours ago, applestar said: This song is getting hate for everything but the actual song itself. The worst yall can say about it is titties in the music video and it sounds basic Katy is going to be flamed no matter what she does, she's either a flop or an abuser, i just hope she produces good music and ignores the hate this is so weird. this is like saying - well, everyone hate person x, person x might as well un@live person y, because she's hated anyway. like??? not to mention that the "hate"was non-existent before the luke mess. people were actually waiting for dance pop bops which we're in a huge lack of.
Recommended Posts