ImpressMeMuch Posted June 18 Posted June 18 4 hours ago, Tropical said: ATRL has absolutely no critical thinking skills, proven time and time again. Of course artistry is important and Charli has long been spouting exactly that. Plus "Sympathy is a Knife" is literally deferential to Taylor anyhow - Charli is literally acknowledging how Taylor is far more successful than her, and she could never reach that, but also she knows it's not meant for her and would absolutely mean the end of everything she holds artistically important to try and reach that level. Taylor fans should learn to read a ******* lyric and interpret something sensibly other than the rabid-dogs-barking-at-the-gate approach whenever they think an undue slight towards their messiah is uttered. Especially coming off of the entire concept of the album crash…. It is so self important to as a Taylor fan take this personally lol
1989 Posted June 18 Posted June 18 On 6/16/2024 at 12:45 PM, Petra von Kant said: Taylor Swift in year 2024, 34 years old: You know how to ball I know Aristotle Brand-new, full throttle Touch me while your bros play Grand Theft Auto Charli XCX in year 2024, 31 years old: I think about it all the time That I might run out of time But I finally met my baby And a baby might be mine 'Cause maybe one day I might If I don't run out of time Would it give my life a new purpose? I think about it all the time seeing the difference? These comparisons are always the dumbest, because nearly every pop artist has their lighter, 'fluffier' songs, which So High School obviously is; don't act dense. I could also point out some of Charli's. Also Taylor Swift in the year 2024, 34 years old: Spoiler Six weeks of breathing clean air I still miss the smoke Were you making fun of me with some esoteric joke? Now I want to sell my house and set fire to all my clothes And hire a priest to come and exorcise my demons Even if I die screaming Again, Taylor Swift in the year 2024, 34 years old: Spoiler You ****-talked me under the table, talking rings and talking cradles I wish I could un-recall how we almost had it all Dancing phantoms on the terrace, are they second-hand embarrassed That I can't get out of bed 'cause something counterfeit's dead? Oh, what a valiant roar What a bland goodbye The coward claimed he was a lion I'm combing through the braids of lies "I'll never leave" "Never mind" Our field of dreams, engulfed in fire Your arson's match, your somber eyes And I'll still see it until I die You're the loss of my life You could literally cherry pick from a songwriter's catalog all day long.
Petra von Kant Posted June 18 Posted June 18 4 hours ago, 1989 said: These comparisons are always the dumbest, because nearly every pop artist has their lighter, 'fluffier' songs, which So High School obviously is; don't act dense. I could also point out some of Charli's. Also Taylor Swift in the year 2024, 34 years old: Hide contents Six weeks of breathing clean air I still miss the smoke Were you making fun of me with some esoteric joke? Now I want to sell my house and set fire to all my clothes And hire a priest to come and exorcise my demons Even if I die screaming Again, Taylor Swift in the year 2024, 34 years old: Hide contents You ****-talked me under the table, talking rings and talking cradles I wish I could un-recall how we almost had it all Dancing phantoms on the terrace, are they second-hand embarrassed That I can't get out of bed 'cause something counterfeit's dead? Oh, what a valiant roar What a bland goodbye The coward claimed he was a lion I'm combing through the braids of lies "I'll never leave" "Never mind" Our field of dreams, engulfed in fire Your arson's match, your somber eyes And I'll still see it until I die You're the loss of my life You could literally cherry pick from a songwriter's catalog all day long. agreed. the problem is that Taylor doesn't see So Highschool as a ''fluffier, lighter song''. it would be no problem if she did that. but instead she's absolutely serious about a song which is objectively ridiculous songwriting-wise. Charli on the other hand never had any problem to admit that songs such as vroom vroom have pretty ''fun-dumb'' lyrics and her being that open about it and dividing em from her other music is why her more serious songwriting moments were never disgraced. 3
PoisonedIvy Posted June 18 Posted June 18 3 minutes ago, Petra von Kant said: agreed. the problem is that Taylor doesn't see So Highschool as a ''fluffier, lighter song''. it would be no problem if she did that. but instead she's absolutely serious about a song which is objectively ridiculous songwriting-wise. Charli on the other hand never had any problem to admit that songs such as vroom vroom have pretty ''fun-dumb'' lyrics and her being that open about it and dividing em from her other music is why her more serious songwriting moments were never disgraced. Factually untrue, Taylor literally talks at length about how 1/3 of her catalogue is silly, frivolous, immature, and not meant to be taken seriously. Charli and Taylor are exceptional songwriters capable of multifaceted, nuanced storytelling from multiple different perspectives.
Recommended Posts