teenager Posted Saturday at 01:47 PM Share Posted Saturday at 01:47 PM robyn sweetie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fromily Posted Saturday at 01:48 PM Share Posted Saturday at 01:48 PM this specific series of tweets is SO funny like girl keep that hammer and sickle OUT of your username until you can produce a series of hit tweets on the social function of art Spoiler but tbh this whole "expert knowledge/criticism actually doesn't exist and/or is inferior to non-expert opinion" attitude is so widespread online it's genuinely alarming :/ 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cloröx Posted Saturday at 02:00 PM Share Posted Saturday at 02:00 PM People give Charli too much credit when in reality it was Sophie who shaped and curated her sound Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wicked Posted Saturday at 02:03 PM Author Share Posted Saturday at 02:03 PM 6 minutes ago, fromily said: this specific series of tweets is SO funny like girl keep that hammer and sickle OUT of your username until you can produce a series of hit tweets on the social function of art Hide contents but tbh this whole "expert knowledge/criticism actually doesn't exist and/or is inferior to non-expert opinion" attitude is so widespread online it's genuinely alarming :/ I don't know how to say that without sounding pretentious, but there's absolutely such a thing as... well, not knowing enough to be giving wide sweeping opinions. And yeah I find it amusing an alleged anticapitalist looks to the market to validate art. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katamari Posted Saturday at 02:08 PM Share Posted Saturday at 02:08 PM Not moistbreezy getting involved 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daddy Posted Saturday at 02:09 PM Share Posted Saturday at 02:09 PM 8 minutes ago, Cloröx said: People give Charli too much credit when in reality it was Sophie who shaped and curated her sound Yes, Charli was a middleman but she saw a smaller artist and gave her a platform. SOPHIE's impact wouldn't have been the same without Charli. Facts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kummercell Posted Saturday at 02:11 PM Share Posted Saturday at 02:11 PM I think there's a big misconception about popularity tbh. Charli IS a popular artist. Even if she doesn't score #1s she's still more popular than 99% of all musicians that have ever existed. The existence of megastars like Taylor/Bey has warped our understanding of popularity 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fromily Posted Saturday at 02:38 PM Share Posted Saturday at 02:38 PM 21 minutes ago, Wicked said: I don't know how to say that without sounding pretentious, but there's absolutely such a thing as... well, not knowing enough to be giving wide sweeping opinions. And yeah I find it amusing an alleged anticapitalist looks to the market to validate art. oh yeah absolutely 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GentleEarthquake Posted Saturday at 03:05 PM Share Posted Saturday at 03:05 PM Popular artists take inspiration from lesser known artists all the time. My flop fave literally inspired Billie Eilish to begin her career Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colmillo Posted Saturday at 03:22 PM Share Posted Saturday at 03:22 PM Yes, mainstream artists get inspired by underground/lesser known artists all the time because they're the ones actually innovating and taking risks, the GP will probably say they don't have any impact because they haven't heard of them and attribute that innovation to the mainstream artists, but at the end of the day they're just the public, they don't have any involvement in the creative process so they don't know all of the inspiration that happens behind the scenes 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.gif.925c0d55436543f577d32b36dad27758.gif)
Recommended Posts