XtinaStripped Posted June 9 Posted June 9 There isn't any hits on the album if Woops doesn't do anything. She shouldn't re-sign with them though anyway. They're responsible for the state her career got in when they wouldn't release Treat Yourself V.1.
Letemtalk Posted June 9 Posted June 9 Was she on a six album deal? I didn't realise she had six albums already, until I checked just now, so she is a free agent now if she wants to be? Independent artist might be the best option for her. You still don't get label promo, but you keep a bigger percentage.
mrpartyrocker Posted June 9 Posted June 9 12 hours ago, RealityBites said: But she had a huge hit not that long ago so they should take some sort of risk on her When her album can't do more than 2m the risk is higher than the potential hits! Her music just doesn't resonate and literally all sounds the same. Made you look was a lucky try out of a million. music is business, you invest in it if there's a benefit for it. 1 1 1
Polgg48 Posted June 9 Posted June 9 for better term flopping in these time where those swiftieforpalestine peeps would unnecessarily expose meghan on baseless arguments with long 30 pages thread. epic is always trash, she wins on contract ends and her own happy family life.
Radical Pessimism Posted June 9 Posted June 9 Made you look was a fluke and it wasn't supposed to happen.
Fitzswiftie Posted June 9 Posted June 9 22 hours ago, MasterExpose said: Up to this day I have no idea how All About that Bass won a Grammy. They truly award just popularity and then these artists just disappear off radar because nobody cares about them It didn't. Her only Grammy is for Best New Artist.
Scandalous Posted June 10 Posted June 10 i'm surprised they even let her release this album so quickly, maybe they're trying to speed her out of her contract
stephen1108 Posted June 10 Posted June 10 I was just thinking how it's incredible that she keeps consistently putting music out without any real hits as of lately. Considering she writes her ****, her projects must not cost much, and the little they do generate prob turn a profit for the label.
professor2000 Posted June 10 Posted June 10 3 hours ago, Xtripped said: Tiktok really ruined music industry. People thought the same about MTV in the 80s though. It's just a medium to promote music, while it has its downsides, it's not the root of the problem imo. Music industry itself is not innovative + therefore they have to bend at the whim of these tech companies. The music industry did it to itself though by being archaic (and exploiting artists truth be told…lowkey karma ). Social media is not going anywhere. Even if TikTok gets banned, there will be another app. Really comes down to labels not being innovative and not knowing how to break artists outside of what's on trend.
Onyxmage Posted June 10 Posted June 10 On 6/8/2024 at 2:16 PM, Cheers said: Well..makes sense, no? Why invest money into a project if there will be no return. They really don't give a sh** about artists.
shyboi Posted June 10 Posted June 10 when i do my walk, walk, i can guarantee your jaw will drop, drop
45seconds Posted June 10 Posted June 10 On 6/8/2024 at 5:16 PM, Cheers said: Well..makes sense, no? Why invest money into a project if there will be no return. This is nonsense. You have to send it to radio ad playlist so it DOES give you a return.
BlueTimberwolf Posted June 10 Posted June 10 This is weird because I feel like I see random artists no one has ever heard of, with no hits, on big playlists all the time. At least Meghan has some hits and name recognition.
xluvxduffxmusicx Posted June 10 Posted June 10 I didn't know this is her sixth album Didn't she release another one recently? I thought she was on era 4.
Recommended Posts