Burn Posted June 5 Posted June 5 (edited) Kim Kardashian's outfit to Janet Jackson's concert was more than 30 years in the making. The reality star wore the same costume that the singer sported in her 1993 "If" music video while attending the show in Thousand Palms, Calif. Kim, 43, showed off the custom suede crop top with bone detailing and lace-up flared pants via her Instagram Stories ahead of Jackson's "Together Again" tour stop. Kardashian bought the outfit in a 2021 auction. https://pagesix.com/2024/06/05/style/kim-kardashian-wears-janet-jackson-if-outfit-to-concert/ Edited June 5 by Burn
Popular Post Burn Posted June 5 Author Popular Post Posted June 5 now.... I guess she did purchase it fair and square in an auction, so it is rightfully hers. but to wear such an iconic outfit to a concert where god knows what damage will happen to it.... anyway stream this legendary top 5 single 15 8
ImpressMeMuch Posted June 5 Posted June 5 1 minute ago, Burn said: now.... I guess she did purchase it fair and square in an auction, so it is rightfully hers. but to wear such an iconic outfit to a concert where god knows what damage will happen to it.... anyway stream this legendary top 5 single the woman is clickbait personified and no doubt did this for the omg headlines 4 1
holyground13 Posted June 5 Posted June 5 The only positive thing I can say is that she's recognising iconography. Basically 6 minutes ago, TitanicSurvivor said: Scream: "f**k you Aimee!" to the night sky 4
Damien M Posted June 5 Posted June 5 Wow that outfit is TINY. How small are these people in real life?
Johnny Jacobs Posted June 5 Posted June 5 Not yall overreacting over a piece of clothing. She bought it. Otherwise it would've sat in someone's closet for another 40 years. Like it's not that deep. 4 4
Twixters Posted June 5 Posted June 5 16 minutes ago, Damien M said: Wow that outfit is TINY. How small are these people in real life? Janet was SKINNY during that era
shyboi Posted June 5 Posted June 5 Kim is such a legend, i need her to buy a Britney outfit next, the oops! or the slave for you one
family.guy123 Posted June 5 Posted June 5 If you were genuinely concerned about the well-being of this garment you would've been aware of its impending sale and found a way to acquire it yourself. Same goes for that Chris Pratt house.
Gesamtkunstwerk Posted June 5 Posted June 5 1 minute ago, family.guy123 said: If you were genuinely concerned about the well-being of this garment you would've been aware of its impending sale and found a way to acquire it yourself. Same goes for that Chris Pratt house. Uhm, yes, because most people got money to buy San Francisco area real estate and clothing that famous people have worn 1 4
Bosque Posted June 5 Posted June 5 She literally did nothing to the Marilyn Monroe dress though? Why do you guys believe literally everything you read online?
Burn Posted June 5 Author Posted June 5 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Bosque said: She literally did nothing to the Marilyn Monroe dress though? Why do you guys believe literally everything you read online? Edited June 5 by Burn 2
Bosque Posted June 5 Posted June 5 3 minutes ago, Burn said: What on earth made you look at those two pictures and think "that is a totally accurate comparison picture with 0 differences in lightning and angle. I can definitely use this to play little detective!"? The literal museum that owns the dress has confirmed there has been no damage: Quote But the gown's owner, Ripley's Believe It or Not, says a "calculated risk" was made in allowing the dress to be worn and it was not damaged "in any way". Ripley's Believe It or Not was widely criticised for allowing the TV star to wear the fragile gown. However, on Thursday it rejected the damage claims. "From the bottom of the Met steps, where Kim got into the dress, to the top where it was returned, the dress was in the same condition it started in," Amanda Joiner, Ripley's vice-president of publishing and licensing, said in a statement. https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-61801906 1 1 1 2
discosean Posted June 5 Posted June 5 She bought it. She can do whatever she wants to it. End of story. 1 1
Janet Posted June 5 Posted June 5 Why wouldn't you wear that to a Janet Jackson concert if you owned it? 1
liquiddiamonds Posted June 5 Posted June 5 please it was all about janet and her energy. she could wear a plastic bag back then and it would be a fashion moment because she was just THAT GIRL. Sorry kim
Breathe On Moi Posted June 5 Posted June 5 3 hours ago, shyboi said: Kim is such a legend, i need her to buy a Britney outfit next, the oops! or the slave for you one we literally don't want this, you are a double agent confirmed 1
shyboi Posted June 6 Posted June 6 7 minutes ago, Breathe On Moi said: we literally don't want this, you are a double agent confirmed I did not say you guys want it, i do, i like Kim
Recommended Posts