Jump to content

Miley Cyrus: Why did the Grammys wait 20 years to take me seriously?


Recommended Posts

Posted

rs-12405-20130827-miley-x624-1377623704.

 

Maybe this 

  • Confused 1

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • thatsmydemi

    4

  • HandsInTheAir

    3

  • dirrtydiana

    2

  • Fitzswiftie

    2

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Mother's Daughter and Plastic Hearts deserve Grammys for being masterpieces:johnald:. But I don't agree Miley only won because it was a hit cuz they are unpredictable, for Camila,, all her hits didnt win Havana Senorita BamBam, but a flop like Mi Persona Favorita won. Do not understand about the award. VMAs is better cuz Fan Voted

  • ATRL Moderator
Posted

She just recently started making music worthy of a Grammy. Wrecking Ball was her best shot at one before Plastic Hearts and the 2014 Grammys were super competitive with Royals (deservedly) winning Best Pop Solo Performance. 
 

So, frankly, Grammys are questionable in general but it makes sense it took Miley as long as it did given her uneven discography. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Bloo said:

She just recently started making music worthy of a Grammy. Wrecking Ball was her best shot at one before Plastic Hearts and the 2014 Grammys were super competitive with Royals (deservedly) winning Best Pop Solo Performance. 
 

So, frankly, Grammys are questionable in general but it makes sense it took Miley as long as it did given her uneven discography. 

also no one at the grammys will respect someone who hates their projects every era

Posted

Before flowers her only song embraced by olds enough to go top ten on AC was the climb, which was from a Disney channel soundtrack

Posted

Because she's a glorified covers artist. Her music is terrible, only Selena's and Demi's is worse I guess, and all her good will was founded on boomers being gagged by her singing covers on Facebook. It's why Flowers success doesn't translate to album sales, because there isn't much behind her besides "does a good cover of X song"

Posted

Who even takes her seriously now? 

Posted

The question is why does she take the scammys seriously 20 years into her career?

  • Like 2
Posted

People in here defending and excusing the Grammys like they're the epitome of taste or something lol 

  • Thanks 2
Posted

The Grammys are a corrupt popularity contest that only exist to award people that look and act a certain way. As mentioned, Madonna didn't get a Grammy until she was 41. Miley was first seen as a Disney kid, then was too controversial, then kinda disappeared. But she was absolutely worth of recognition as are many others.

  • Thanks 4
Posted
7 hours ago, alexrex said:

rs-12405-20130827-miley-x624-1377623704.

 

Maybe this 

Then they approved WAP on their stage 

Posted

Plastic Hearts and Angels Like You not getting its flowers is a crime

 

Drag them!

 

 

Posted

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, dirrtydiana said:

Then they approved WAP on their stage 

And WAP wouldn't have been approved in 2013 period. The song wouldn't have been played on the Radio as much as Wrecking Ball or even recommended by YouTube 2013 algorithm due to its content unlike Wrecking Ball. So thank God the song came out 8 years later. 

Edited by Namie-Knowles
Posted

She should know why. 

 

1. Being a Disney artist makes it extra hard to take them seriously. There's a reason she's barely got nominated in 20 years, just like her peers. 

2. Her image from Bangerz up to Younger Now was almost comical. She tried too hard to be a good girl gone bad in the worst possible way. Her antics and gimmicks were embarrassing and made her look like a brat. 

 

I'm glad she's got the recognition she's had with Flowers because it's always felt like these Disney girls have been overlooked in favor of other bigger pop girls when their music is not as bad as some people make them seem. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, thatsmydemi said:

 

 

 

But if YOUR fave said the same thing you'd be cheering her on. That tweet is obnoxious and wrong btw. but you wouldnt know because you listen to demi screeching at her mic:deadbanana4:

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, AccioMiley said:

But if YOUR fave said the same thing you'd be cheering her on. That tweet is obnoxious and wrong btw. but you wouldnt know because you listen to demi screeching at her mic:deadbanana4:

I just posted it because it's going viral :skull: relax

 

my thoughts about this are in a post below

 

Edited by thatsmydemi
Posted

I like her but as much as she worked hard, she hasn't done that much that really deserves to be recognized as much as what Flowers has done. But Bangerz deserved def as well as Malibu.

Posted (edited)

It's not particularly complex. There was about a 10 year stretch between Bangerz and Endless Summer Vacation where her music simply didn't garner that much attention, so of course she didn't win a Grammy during that time. Also some of her earlier hits, while great, weren't exactly Grammy material imho. :lakitu:

Edited by Sugar-Rush
Posted

Miley NEVER deserved a Grammy before Flowers.

DiabeticGrandpa
Posted

Did she really think that she was worth of a Grammy with Bangerz? :skull:

Posted

The comments about the quality of her music as if the grammys cared about quality most of the time. We've seen plenty of trash songs getting nominated over good songs only because those artists have better connections in the industry. :toofunny3:

  • Like 2
Posted

No shade Miley but, no one knew who were in 2004 for it to be 20 whole years lol. Her debut album came out in 2007 so it's been 17 years actually. 

 

 

Posted

She is so right for this, I'm with you queen!

Posted

She was nomination-worthy, but winning?... hmm :duck:

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.