fauxtography Posted May 29 Posted May 29 PP's short songs make sense because she doesn't have the talent or charisma to hold attention for 3+ minutes! Sometimes you play to your strengths and PP's strength is knowing when to cut the cameras. 3
Orsay Posted May 29 Posted May 29 I'm pretty sure one of Dionne's granddaughters or something runs her social media cause there's no way an 83 yr old would put "?" either way queen is right !
Maxxxine Posted May 29 Posted May 29 Girl can someone revoke this gay's access to Ms. Warwick's Twitter account already
DammnBaby Posted May 30 Posted May 30 (edited) On 5/28/2024 at 7:55 PM, Mtjjproducer said: Ironically for Dion I went to her essential on Apple Music and skimmed and the majority of her songs are less than 3 minutes so maybe the pink chick was on to something The reality is that they used alchemy to fit 5 minutes worth of songcraft into 2 minutes and 30 seconds in the 60's. So, Ms. Dionne is not wrong. There's a reason songs like the below are stone-cold classics, and PP's will be forgotten. Edited May 30 by DammnBaby
Phaunzie Posted May 30 Posted May 30 I agree with Madame Warwick, PP needs to STOP shorten her songs to less than 2 minutes. I literally have not touched any of PP songs is a while because her discography is fleeting. Like I wish, SPMiami had way longer songs because it gives the songs to breathe.
goverm3nth0ker Posted June 2 Posted June 2 but some songs of the 50s, 60s are really short too they don't even last 3 minutes so miss Vicky Beverly is not wrong
Recommended Posts