Delirious Posted May 26 Posted May 26 Just now, GraceRandolph said: Calling any pro-Palestinian perspective Hamas is racist. Where did i mention pro-Palestinian perspectives in my sentence? Why do you people always do this? Learn to read. 1
GraceRandolph Posted May 26 Author Posted May 26 1 minute ago, Delirious said: Where did i mention pro-Palestinian perspectives in my sentence? Why do you people always do this? Learn to read. In that case you admit to being off topic and have been reported. 1
Communion Posted May 26 Posted May 26 (edited) 5 hours ago, beautiful player said: against Hamas' ability to organise and influence 3 minutes ago, Delirious said: Where did i mention pro-Palestinian perspectives in my sentence? It's okay to just say you hate Palestinian Americans and Palestinians at large. What the article is reporting on and you're defending: Quote Now, however, the federal government is pressuring companies to ban "Hamas-linked" accounts and those of pro-Palestinian Americans. Edited May 26 by Communion 1
Delirious Posted May 26 Posted May 26 (edited) 5 minutes ago, GraceRandolph said: In that case you admit to being off topic and have been reported. your thread should be reported for being misleading but are we surprised? The Biden administration has publicly admitted that it is working with tech companies to "limit Hamas's use of online platforms, including social media," If anything, conflating Hamas with "pro-Palestine" like your thread here is stupid 3 minutes ago, Communion said: It's okay to just say you hate Palestinian Americans and Palestinians are large. What the article is reporting on and you're defending: Ohkay now you're just purposely being dense. Edited May 26 by Delirious 2
Communion Posted May 26 Posted May 26 1 minute ago, Delirious said: Ohkay now you're just purposely being dense. Why is the White House working to ban accounts that share graphic footage of Israel's bombing campaigns - something the hyperlibked CBS article contributes to being defined as "Hamas linked".
GraceRandolph Posted May 26 Author Posted May 26 5 minutes ago, Delirious said: Goodbye Hamas! Why is the White House working to ban accounts that share graphic footage of Israel's bombing campaigns - something the hyperlibked CBS article contributes to being defined as "Hamas linked". [2]
Miracle Whip Posted May 26 Posted May 26 24 minutes ago, Delirious said: Where did i mention pro-Palestinian perspectives in my sentence? Why do you people always do this? Learn to read. hmm…
GhostBox Posted May 26 Posted May 26 5 hours ago, beautiful player said: Misleading and incorrect thread title. Biden is fighting against Hamas' ability to organise and influence, as he should. Maybe I'm a bit of an old school leftie, but I think terrorists are bad. 1
mig123 Posted May 26 Posted May 26 10 hours ago, Communion said: Are you both illiterate? The article discusses the White House sending memos to Meta and this reflexively resulting in Meta cracking down on not just accounts related to Hamas but citing Palestinian Americans getting their accounts deleted for "expressing support for dangerous entities as defined by" a terrorist organization list maintained by the Biden admin. Leading to such companies taking the most conservative stance possible to avoid being cracked down on. Thus the example of someone banned for praising the Houthi blockade on Israel despite that the US had removed the Houthis from this very terrorist designation within recent years. there is no receipts…. so it falls under conspiracy theory 1
Onyxmage Posted May 27 Posted May 27 16 hours ago, Communion said: Are you both illiterate? The article discusses the White House sending memos to Meta and this reflexively resulting in Meta cracking down on not just accounts related to Hamas but citing Palestinian Americans getting their accounts deleted for "expressing support for dangerous entities as defined by" a terrorist organization list maintained by the Biden admin. Leading to such companies taking the most conservative stance possible to avoid being cracked down on. Thus the example of someone banned for praising the Houthi blockade on Israel despite that the US had removed the Houthis from this very terrorist designation within recent years. Last time I checked Meta was actively HELPING Trump win elections by refusing to remove misinformation and conspiracy theories even when reported because they deemed it "free speech." Despite what you think NOBODY is helping Biden win on social media. Corporations are foaming at the mouth at another Trump presidency because he has openly stated that he wants even MORE deregulation and tax cuts for them.
Delirious Posted May 27 Posted May 27 15 hours ago, Miracle Whip said: hmm… yes? last time i checked pretty sure atrl has a lot of pro hamas folks!
Eat The Acid Posted May 27 Posted May 27 He's really trying to kill as many Palestinians as possible with the least lashings as possible. This man is calculated and evil.
raisetheroof Posted May 27 Posted May 27 Lord have mercy.. Biden has made his entire presidency's ethos about protecting democracy, yet the protection of one of the cornerstones of democracy - the freedom of speech - doesn't seem that important to him
Recommended Posts