Jump to content

Billie Eilish - 'HIT ME HARD AND SOFT'


Recommended Posts

Posted

Every other review being 80+ and this being 6.8 made me so mad but anyways :rip:

  • Replies 9.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • whatyouwant_

    853

  • dalladallamallamalla

    485

  • dreww

    482

  • Dash_inthedark

    434

Posted

Can we just say this is homophobia like 

Posted
4 minutes ago, dirrtydiana said:

This makes no sense at all. It literally keeps it interesting and fresh. If they were missing they'd be scoring her down for it being linear.

It's not interesting, I  just want to get to the good parts and skip the bad parts and you can't really do that cause they insist on sticking two songs together

Posted

Does this mean we can finally stop taking Pitchfork seriously or will y'all once again act like they're the end-all-be-all next time someone y'all don't like release an album and they pan it? 

 

:clack:

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Down 4
Posted

I agree with their assessment 

Posted

Still AOTY f the gossip ! 

  • Like 2
Posted

I don't disagree with some of the criticisms, but I thought this was a nice 7.3.

Posted (edited)

higher than ttpd :duca:

 

Edited by Asscatchem
Posted (edited)

I looked into the reviewer (Hannah Jocelyn) and they/she/it rarely ever ever ever give over a 7. Also they are very young and, based on their Medium, appear to be a contrarian indie-head who does not fw main stream artists in the slightest.

Edited by dalladallamallamalla
  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
1 minute ago, mael said:

It's not interesting, I  just want to get to the good parts and skip the bad parts and you can't really do that cause they insist on sticking two songs together

That sounds like a you problem.

 

no one ever complained about beyonce (who's CC they scored to the heavens) for having songs like sweet honey buckiing or partition in ST

  • Like 3
Posted
9 minutes ago, Kayseri Mantisi said:

Can someone tell me why people who say "6.8 isn't a pan at all" considered the same score a mega pan for Solar Power? 

 

:confused:

Also just 0.2 higher than critically panned TTPD :giraffe:

Posted

Poopfork you are such a bunch of biased losers

Posted
1 minute ago, dalladallamallamalla said:

I looked into the reviewer (Hannah Jocelyn) and they/she/it rarely ever ever ever give over a 7. Also are very young and, based on their Medium, appear to be contrarian indie-head who does not fw main stream artists in the slightest.

C U Next Tue basically 

Posted

This is such an L take

Posted

lets hope fantano praises...

Posted

Pitchfork really said poptimism is DEAD.

Posted

Pitchfork hates seeing (interesting) queer women win

 

CbTERii.thumb.gif.9820a2867347ea103d17d6

Posted
4 minutes ago, dalladallamallamalla said:

I looked into the reviewer (Hannah Jocelyn) and they/she/it rarely ever ever ever give over a 7. Also they are very young and, based on their Medium, appear to be a contrarian indie-head who does not fw main stream artists in the slightest.

Yeah that's so ridiculous. If you don't like the artist you shouldn't be the one publishing an article meant for valid critiques.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

Can we stop calling things above 6.1 panned. Panned would be a 4.7

Edited by Into The Void
  • Like 1
Posted

Can Pitchfork like actually just stop reviewing her, they don't like her and we're not going to read it :deadvision:

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, 4Real said:

Also just 0.2 higher than critically panned TTPD :giraffe:

And that thread got a dozen pages worth of kii kiis and circle jerking from ATRL for being 'panned' by Pitchfork. 

 

Very interesting how the narrative abruptly switches when it's an artist they're not bitter about! 

 

:clack:

Edited by The Music Industry
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 2
  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted
23 minutes ago, TalkThatRihanna said:

They really have been doing miss after miss.

 

Giving this and the PinkPantheress album less than a 7 :deadbanana4:

Ugh I completely forgot they gave this AMAZING album a 6.4 :biblio:

 

PinkPantheress-Heaven-Knows.jpg

  • Like 3
Posted

So as per everyone in atrl there I say it

 

It's a PANNED album

 

Side note : it's  a great album but P4K above anyone else. They can't be paid apparently and have no agenda. 

Posted
1 minute ago, badgirlriri said:

Can Pitchfork like actually just stop reviewing her, they don't like her and we're not going to read it :deadvision:

I think they need to seriously be called out on their bullshit.

Posted

"that Taylor check" while Tay's latest album also got panned :rip:

  • Haha 7
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.