ALA Posted May 1 Share Posted May 1 Why wouldn't the drop make sense? The variants, cassettes and deluxe cds are no longer on sale at her store 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simmnfierzig Posted May 1 Share Posted May 1 21 minutes ago, Mirkomonster said: Ok but falling from 1,9 million to 125k in One week Is at least suspicious I dont think it is. Idk how there are that many people buying it in week 2 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fridayteenage Posted May 1 Share Posted May 1 If u Stan u buy first week Meanwhile lover and folklore are STILL top ten in sales four five years later, there is interest in purchasing after that long 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maroonx Posted May 1 Share Posted May 1 I'm LOLing at people still trying to find way to drag Taylor, even after record breaking sales in its first week. Yoll are pressed that your favs can't even pull her second week numbers and even reach total sales in her FIRST DAY of sales. stay pressed in a TAYLOR SWIFT thread haters x 7 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MP3 Posted May 1 Share Posted May 1 455,000 for a second week is crazy, it's hard for most of artists to achieve that as first week 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1989 Posted May 1 Share Posted May 1 Incredible hold, and anyone trying to deny it is a ****ing dumbass. 6 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PurrKaty Posted May 1 Share Posted May 1 People had weeks and weeks of preorder and there's not all the variants available that were with the weeks of preorder. Plus so many people already have the album. Of course it's gonna have a large drop. Yet it's still more than most big artists do in their first week 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PoisonPill Posted May 2 Share Posted May 2 (edited) 6 hours ago, MP3 said: 455,000 for a second week is crazy, it's hard for most of artists to achieve that as first week *It's impossible for literally anyone except 2-3 artists to score first week sales as big as TTPD's second week. Edited May 2 by PoisonPill 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BabyBenzz Posted May 2 Share Posted May 2 (edited) 20 hours ago, dejmieeen said: Sure Jan. She ain't Adele. GP doesn't care that much and delusional Swifties made only 1st week hyperhuge. well thank god for that... imagine going from 3.4m to 800K and having 0 longevity Taylor is more stable and consistent with her success, reaching new peaks decades after she debuted. Adele is a fad and i cant wait for her next album to solidify her status as one. Edited May 2 by BabyBenzz 9 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedMiracle Posted May 2 Share Posted May 2 Whew the DROP. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asscatchem Posted May 2 Share Posted May 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Duff Posted May 2 Share Posted May 2 Whenever you're at the top, the detractors will be louder. Who in their right mind would criticize a 455k for Week 2? Seriously??? 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ithinkheknowsoutsold Posted May 2 Share Posted May 2 21 hours ago, Mirkomonster said: Ok but falling from 1,9 million to 125k in One week Is at least suspicious Midnights sold about 2.8 million copes in total, TTPD is at around 2.1 million in 2 weeks. It's going to end up selling about the same as Midnights, so I can't see anything suspicious. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PurrKaty Posted May 2 Share Posted May 2 22 hours ago, Mirkomonster said: Ok but falling from 1,9 million to 125k in One week Is at least suspicious The 1.9M copies were from over 2 months of pre sales, plus the debut week is always the highest sales week for an established artist. The drop in week 2 is due to it being only 7 days of sales tracking, compared to over 2 months totaled together for week 1 numbers. There also aren't all the variants available like there was throughout the over 2 months of pre sales. Additionally 1.9M people already bought it, so that's less people that are buying in week 2. I don't know what's suspicious to you, cause it seems pretty reasonable. 1989 went from 1.359M pure sales in week 1, to 122,000 in week 2. Pretty close 2nd week numbers, or are those sus too? Lmao 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnusualBoy Posted May 2 Share Posted May 2 6 hours ago, BabyBenzz said: well thank god for that... imagine going from 3.4m to 800K and having 0 longevity Taylor is more stable and consistent with her success, reaching new peaks decades after she debuted. Adele is a fad and i cant wait for her next album to solidify her status as one. Now you're reaching, how's Adele a fad when she's had 4 successful albums? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alanmontes Posted May 2 Share Posted May 2 Taylor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitboga Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 On 4/30/2024 at 7:02 PM, Assassin said: Who said I am a fake Adele fan??? Yea cus there is totally a real fan of some near 40 year old act whose only active 1 month every 5 years on an online forum like this, you're totally not hiding lmao regardless, given TTPD basically outsold 30 with streams alone, and the second week streams is still in fact bigger than most new albums nowadays should've opened up your little head about how crazy the hold actually is, (better than even Morgan wallen album), . but isn't your strong suit as we can see. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BabyBenzz Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 17 hours ago, UnusualBoy said: Now you're reaching, how's Adele a fad when she's had 4 successful albums? well that's not really how it went.. 19 was a flop at first 21 was an album that wasn't front-loaded but had extremely good longevity and sparked interest in 19 which eventually made it sell 25 was her peak and it was monstrous and everyone was invested but the era was also front-loaded and did not serve the same longevity as 21 30 was also front-loaded but was a disappointment and ultimately marked her downfall. FYI: none of the above albums are currently charting on the BB200.. her next album will truly show if she became a fad of not. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
family.guy123 Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 1 hour ago, Kitboga said: Yea cus there is totally a real fan of some near 40 year old act whose only active 1 month every 5 years on an online forum like this, you're totally not hiding lmao regardless, given TTPD basically outsold 30 with streams alone, and the second week streams is still in fact bigger than most new albums nowadays should've opened up your little head about how crazy the hold actually is, (better than even Morgan wallen album), . but isn't your strong suit as we can see. In order for TTPDs streaming hold to be better than "even Morgan wallen album", it requires at least 420k in American streaming units in week two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cuteboyzay Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 Not y'all tryna act like doing 455k on the second week after pulling off 2.6M is a huge "drop" lmaooo!!! I'm not a stan but pulling off 455k after doing 2.6M is still incredible no matter who you stan. Imagine going TRIPLE PLATINUM after just TWO WEEKS after only ONE lead single! PLEEAASSEEE!!! 455k is an amazing number, and incredibly impressive lmao! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cuteboyzay Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 24 minutes ago, BabyBenzz said: well that's not really how it went.. 19 was a flop at first 21 was an album that wasn't front-loaded but had extremely good longevity and sparked interest in 19 which eventually made it sell 25 was her peak and it was monstrous and everyone was invested but the era was also front-loaded and did not serve the same longevity as 21 30 was also front-loaded but was a disappointment and ultimately marked her downfall. FYI: none of the above albums are currently charting on the BB200.. her next album will truly show if she became a fad of not. Uhm… girl even if her next album "flops", she won't be a fad. After 4 successful albums (one of them obviously being intentionally lackluster because she intentionally didn't want all that attention). She won't be a fad. Having 3 classic albums back to back is RARE af. So even if she retired NOW. She would still at least be seen as a nostalgia act tbh. Maybe not to America but to the UK (her home) yes. Def would not be a fad no matter how the cards are played next era imo. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonapova Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 28 minutes ago, BabyBenzz said: well that's not really how it went.. 19 was a flop at first 21 was an album that wasn't front-loaded but had extremely good longevity and sparked interest in 19 which eventually made it sell 25 was her peak and it was monstrous and everyone was invested but the era was also front-loaded and did not serve the same longevity as 21 30 was also front-loaded but was a disappointment and ultimately marked her downfall. FYI: none of the above albums are currently charting on the BB200.. her next album will truly show if she became a fad of not. The sales of all of those albums are gag worthy for 99% of artists. No matter how you want to spin it Adele has incredible sales across every album. Taylors drop was expected, but the 2nd week sales are still huge. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pieuxvu Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 3 hours ago, BabyBenzz said: well that's not really how it went.. 19 was a flop at first 21 was an album that wasn't front-loaded but had extremely good longevity and sparked interest in 19 which eventually made it sell 25 was her peak and it was monstrous and everyone was invested but the era was also front-loaded and did not serve the same longevity as 21 30 was also front-loaded but was a disappointment and ultimately marked her downfall. FYI: none of the above albums are currently charting on the BB200.. her next album will truly show if she became a fad of not. 25 Quote did not serve the same longevity as 21 Doesn't mean it wasn't successful. Most artists wish to have 25's success. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Assassin Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 5 hours ago, Kitboga said: Yea cus there is totally a real fan of some near 40 year old act whose only active 1 month every 5 years on an online forum like this, you're totally not hiding lmao What??? Firstly, I am a fan of several musicians, not just Adele. So why wouldn't i be on a music forum??? Secondly, "near 40 year old"?? Adele is 35. That's not near 40 year old. Taylor is only one year younger than her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnusualBoy Posted May 3 Share Posted May 3 4 hours ago, BabyBenzz said: well that's not really how it went.. 19 was a flop at first 21 was an album that wasn't front-loaded but had extremely good longevity and sparked interest in 19 which eventually made it sell 25 was her peak and it was monstrous and everyone was invested but the era was also front-loaded and did not serve the same longevity as 21 30 was also front-loaded but was a disappointment and ultimately marked her downfall. FYI: none of the above albums are currently charting on the BB200.. her next album will truly show if she became a fad of not. But yet again, she's not a fad, you're just talking out of your ass 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts