alfonso12 Posted April 2 Posted April 2 13 minutes ago, Aurora said: Damn I'm sure the artists must have spent hours painstakingly crafting those advertisements for Charli. The attention to detail is just exquisite, must have cost them a pretty penny! Also you can make a beautiful and artistic statement piece of an album cover without being on it—without it being just a block color with some bad typography. The two aren't mutually exclusive. I'm not saying this is some kind of high art, as I said in my post, the cover is ugly, I don't like it, what I'm trying to say is that it's not a matter of budget of not being capable of doing something, it's a statement, just like Beyoncé with her self titled cover. Even herself could've done a cover without the blurry pixelated font, but she wanted that way cause it's part of her vision.
NoOneDiesFromLove Posted April 2 Posted April 2 "Why some things are considered bad" girl if your cover is ugly as **** then people are bound to call it bad it's not that deep omg 2
NoOneDiesFromLove Posted April 2 Posted April 2 And it's not giving "brat" it's giving lazy. Anyways 2
popmusicisdead Posted April 2 Posted April 2 she's so annoying. ma'am, you make music for popper-sniffing twinks. it's not that serious. 2
sha-nasty Posted April 2 Posted April 2 (edited) I've never thought of it as bad or ugly, just plain honestly. But it's in your face, graphic & memorable so I think it serves its purpose as album artwork. Edited April 2 by sha-nasty
Jacobdaniel Posted April 2 Posted April 2 2 hours ago, Illuminati said: She has to be trolling yes she is, that's the point
ahauntingnearu Posted April 2 Posted April 2 I'm so sick of hearing about this album cover omg. How does anyone Stan her?!
Adam’s Eve Posted April 2 Posted April 2 (edited) Her reverse Warholian Willy's Chocolate Experience Expedition Edited April 2 by Adam’s Eve
Recommended Posts