Jump to content

Day 5 | Cowboy Carter: 38 million


Recommended Posts

Posted

:clap3:

  • Replies 791
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Lovett

    34

  • SoundsandSongs

    33

  • Lose My Breath

    32

  • PopFan1996

    18

Posted

Biggest Spotify album debuts by female artists:

 

#1 Midnights 185.6m

#2 1989 (Taylor's Version) 176.2m

#3 Speak Now (Taylor's Version) 126.4m

#4 Red (Taylor's Version) 90.8m

#5 folklore 80.6m

#6 Cowboy Carter 76.1m

#7 thank u, next 70.2m

#8 SOS - 68.7m

#9 evermore 67.4m

#10 SOUR - 63.2m

  • Like 8
Posted
3 minutes ago, The 1 said:

She is Repeaking :clap3:

Which is insane.

  • Like 6
Posted
3 minutes ago, The 1 said:

Bigger than TUNA?

12 vs 27 songs… 

  • Thanks 2
  • Thumbs Down 13
Posted

 

  • Like 2
Posted

255k streaming units is insane. if she does 200k pure or more she might pull half a million sales first week

  • Like 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, Arrows said:

While I'd love it to happen, let's not set her up just to lose again after all these years. There's more important achievements in Bey's career and AOTY is nothing compared to her actual influence (and I say this as a Taylor stan).

 

Old, white country voters won't like the "Bey revives country music" narrative that some publications have pushed, unfortunately. And her loyal Rnb/pop voters will probably be less likely to vote for her this time as well.

 

oh, honestly i didn't even write that with the grammys in mind

 

i meant album of the year FOR ME, i just can't see another release this year surpassing this, the songs are beautiful, catchy and the whole record have a very special aura

 

i wasn't expecting to enjoy it this much, she truly did something special.

  • Like 5
Posted

Congratulations Bey :heart2:

  • Like 1
Posted

Hoping for 400k +

Posted

Incredible numbers despite some lazy ass attempts to make it look otherwise. :clap3: 

Posted
6 minutes ago, The 1 said:

She is Repeaking :clap3:

AGAIN :jonny5:

Posted

I'd wish people would stop mentioning the Grammys. Beyoncé has cultural impact, commercial and success.
 

This is much bigger than a little gold knob thing. 

  • Like 2
Posted

The difference in the US between this and Renaissance. :deadbanana2:

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Lovett said:

You don't think an artist being able to hold people's attention for over an hour with 27 songs is impressive? Let alone a 42-year-old black woman who has been in the industry for nearly 3 decades? :rip: Such a nonsense take.

 

It's embarrassing when people can't just give credit where it's due, regardless of whether you like the artist or not. These numbers are incredible.

Not only that but even if we took out 5 of those songs she'd probably still be higher or be even with SOS. :deadbanana2:

 

Like these brainless f****** are literally making NO sense! 

  • Like 4
Posted (edited)

I find it funny how people are defending having more tracks

 

When other artists did great numbers , excuse was they were many tracks that's why ( eg : Midnights,  SOS , SNTV , RedTV etc..)

 

And when ES did low numbers excuse was cause it's a short album.

 

Now Cowboy did great number with more tracks suddenly having more tracks is disadvantage.

 

Atrl need to pick a side.

Either having more tracks inflate streams or not. You all can't use both excuse as per who you like

Edited by FolkLover1989
  • Like 5
  • Thanks 3
  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Down 3
Posted

Good for her but RENAISSANCE deserved this numbers too

Posted

MOTHER :jonny6:

Posted
4 minutes ago, punisher said:

 

These are great numbers, I think the album will have longevity too. It's mad how comparatively "low" everyone's numbers are after Billboard clamped down on bundles though, imagine if they banned variant editions. 

Posted
28 minutes ago, Gagaqueen said:

27 tracks , not good  :gayoncecat2:

Gaga will punch tony bennet's corpse if she could get half of these numbers. Lmao

  • Haha 10
Posted
3 minutes ago, TayDuaStan said:

This. Huge congrats to Beyonce but let's be honest here, it would've done like 50M if it had TU,N's amount of tracks so… 

 

9 minutes ago, Gaia said:

Great numbers but she also has a **** ton of songs so it's not really as impressive

Did any of you lazy people say this when SOS with 23 songs (CC has 24 songs that get counted for streaming) debuted with less numbers? 

  • Like 1
Posted

Renaissance vs Cowboy comparison 

 

Outside US 

 

25m/37m

 

In US

 

18m/39m

 

Country genre really helped here rather than hindering as many would like to believe. US streams have more than doubled.

  • Confused 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, Gaia said:

Great numbers but she also has a **** ton of songs so it's not really as impressive

By the time you finish streaming CC you could literally stream an album with a normal amount of tracks twice lol + 3 tracks arent eliglbe to have their streams tracked 

Posted
4 minutes ago, FolkLover1989 said:

I find it funny how people are defending having more tracks

 

When other artists did great numbers , excuse was they were many tracks that's why ( eg : Midnights,  SOS , SNTV , RedTV etc..)

 

And when ES did low numbers excuse was cause it's a short album.

 

Now Cowboy did great number with more tracks suddenly having more tracks is disadvantage.

 

Atrl need to pick a side.

Either having more tracks inflate streams or not. You all can't use both excuse as per who you like

More tracks inflate streams, that's TRUE

 

But doesn't take away from the fact that the avg streams per track is a lot higher than Ren. And even if you only take the first 16 tracks (standard length for an album), SHE STILL CLEARED 60M streams which is EXTREMELY IMPRESSIVE for Beyonce

 

And mind you this is a Country album at that

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.