Jump to content

Scream 7 | Neve Campbell | Kevin Williamson to direct


Recommended Posts

Posted
16 minutes ago, Josh said:

Shazam was just plain awful you can tell everyone was miserable filming it lmao 

No it actually wasn't and how would you know were you on set?

8 minutes ago, TheOnlyOne said:

It took 28 days for S3 to hit $79m, 45 days for S5 to, and after 77 days Scream 4's flop ass still didn't even reach half of it 

Can you not celebrate the success of this movie without comparing it to the previous installments? Being this chart obsessed cannot be healthy. 

  • Replies 5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Ampersand13

    230

  • Hurem

    225

  • Josh

    204

  • Chris

    187

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
12 minutes ago, SchmoodRing said:

No it actually wasn't and how would you know were you on set?

Can you not celebrate the success of this movie without comparing it to the previous installments? Being this chart obsessed cannot be healthy. 

Um no because the success of this movie is literally tied to how it does in comparisons to previous installments, as is the case with every sequel. 

Posted
3 hours ago, Hurem said:

It would be wonderful if it could become the biggest Scream of all time, but it seems unlikely at this point :emofish: Let's hope it catches up to Scream 3 at least ($161,8M)

Do you mean worldwide? Cuz it will be the biggest Scream domestically for sure.

Posted
1 minute ago, dussymob said:

Do you mean worldwide? Cuz it will be the biggest Scream domestically for sure.

Yeah, I’m talking about WW numbers, though biggest installment domestically is impressive enough :clap3:

Posted
4 minutes ago, MJHolland said:

And in the long run the og films will be the ones remembered :bibliahh:

What’s up with certain part of Scream fandom hating on new sequels so much? Why don’t you let us enjoy the new movies in peace? Y’all still got 4 movies that you can watch on a loop, it’s not that deep


nene-leaks-nene-leakes.gif

Posted
4 hours ago, Hurem said:

hold up :rip: Scream VI outdid Shazam last weekend in Croatia :sistrens:

 

@Bloodflowers. our impact :sistrens:

 

Omggggg did you also went on a date? Our 12 euros for tickets did that :sistrens:

 

Posted

 

She has the best reaction videos. I literally spend 3 hours watching all 5 of them

Posted
7 hours ago, Hurem said:

What’s up with certain part of Scream fandom hating on new sequels so much? Why don’t you let us enjoy the new movies in peace? Y’all still got 4 movies that you can watch on a loop, it’s not that deep


nene-leaks-nene-leakes.gif

Do not lump in that 4th atrocity with the others please.

 

That being said, loving the new films too. :heart2:

Posted
5 hours ago, MJHolland said:

go watch it again in theaters, no one’s stopping you from enjoying it :bibliahh:it’s not that deep. Getting good but mid sequels to a favorite franchise is not bad just disappointing

making it direct sequals instead of a reboot and trying to connect it all together is probably why it falls a little short

Oh we are watching it, trust. Box office numbers show it :heart2: It’s people like you who try to ruin the fun for us but it ain’t happening :-* 

Posted
6 hours ago, cypriotpcdfan said:

 

She has the best reaction videos. I literally spend 3 hours watching all 5 of them

She has the 2nd best* reaction videos I fear.

 

Queen Zzavid outsold by just a tiny bit

 

 

Posted
8 hours ago, cypriotpcdfan said:

 

She has the best reaction videos. I literally spend 3 hours watching all 5 of them

legend alanda :jonny:

 

by far the best YouTube reactor out there

Posted
20 hours ago, Wrecked said:

I mean, that’s one way to interpret it but I think it was just an oversight on their behalf because the only people who could have told Gale that information would be Billy or Sidney as they were the only ones in the hall during that exchange. Also, the part where Billy slaps his head and calls himself stupid is something only he would really know happened as Sidney has ran off at that point. 

I think it's just the writers adding things in for flair or drama. Every detail about a movie based on real life or a book isn't going to be accurate. They take liberty with some things...

Posted
34 minutes ago, kishi said:

I think it's just the writers adding things in for flair or drama. Every detail about a movie based on real life or a book isn't going to be accurate. They take liberty with some things...

The problem is that the Stab adaptation is too accurate. They show a reenactment of a scene that happens in the first Scream between Sidney and Billy and there’s no way anybody other than Sidney or Billy knew what happened during that scene, so they wouldn’t have been able to do such an accurate recreation. That’s why we’re saying it’s just a plot hole. 

Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, Wrecked said:

The problem is that the Stab adaptation is too accurate. They show a reenactment of a scene that happens in the first Scream between Sidney and Billy and there’s no way anybody other than Sidney or Billy knew what happened during that scene, so they wouldn’t have been able to do such an accurate recreation. That’s why we’re saying it’s just a plot hole. 

Not exactly. The Stab Casey scene during the opening og Scream 2 takes a shower, which Scream 1 Casey doesn't. Also, we've barely seen anything from Stab aside from some clips.

Edited by kishi
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, kishi said:

Not exactly. The Stab Casey scene during the opening og Scream 2 takes a shower, which Scream 1 Casey doesn't. Also, we've barely seen anything from Stab aside from some clips.

You’re missing part of the conversation lol. We were talking about the hall scene between Sidney and Billy, nobody mentioned anything about the opening scene with Casey. 
 


0:32 is the scene somebody brought up and this is the scene we’re calling a plot hole. 
 

Only Billy and Sidney knew what happened during that moment of Scream as they were the only two people there, so how did Gale know? The part at 1:11 where ‘fake Billy’ hits his head is something only the real Billy would have known, unless you’re telling me that Gale resurrected him from the dead to ask him about something so insignificant that happened to him? :gaycat6:

 

Edited by Wrecked
Posted
On 3/22/2023 at 1:34 PM, Kevin2803 said:

I just noticed something about Scream 2. There is a scene from Stab, where Tori Spelling as Sidney talks to Luke Wilson as Billy, mirroring the scene from the first Scream. But until now, i never really thought about how they knew the conversation almost word by word. It's based on Gale's book, but i feel like Sidney isn't really the person to give her information like this when she didn't even wanted to be interviewed. And even if she talked about some of the things that happened, why mentioning this conversation? 

@kishi this is the post we’re talking about. We’re discussing the Billy and Sidney recreation scene. It’s a plot hole. 

Posted

They included that scene because it was a major talking point of the first movie and how batshit insensitive it was to compare your mom leaving you vs Sid's mom dying. It was literally just about the metaness of that talking point and having Tori Spelling and Luke Wilson cameo. 

 

My god, go watch a documentary if you want realism so badly instead of obsessively critiquing the most mundane thing from nearly 30 years ago :rip:

Posted

Yeah, some of you take Scream way too seriously :rip:

Posted
3 minutes ago, TheOnlyOne said:

They included that scene because it was a major talking point of the first movie and how batshit insensitive it was to compare your mom leaving you vs Sid's mom dying. It was literally just about the metaness of that talking point and having Tori Spelling and Luke Wilson cameo. 

 

My god, go watch a documentary if you want realism so badly instead of obsessively critiquing the most mundane thing from nearly 30 years ago :rip:

Why are you so pressed? Somebody asked a simple question because they noticed something upon rewatching and I simply said it’s just a plot hole, which then lead to other people adding their opinions which they’re entitled to do on a forum.


I don’t think anybody going into a Scream movie is expecting realism. :rip:

Posted
3 minutes ago, Hurem said:

Yeah, some of you take Scream way too seriously :rip:

I don’t understand why people having (which was) a civilised discussion about a movie is people taking it too seriously? Are you being forced to come into this thread and join in? No. It’s really not that hard to ignore things that don’t interest you. :gaycat6:

Posted
6 minutes ago, Wrecked said:

I don’t understand why people having (which was) a civilised discussion about a movie is people taking it too seriously? Are you being forced to come into this thread and join in? No. It’s really not that hard to ignore things that don’t interest you. :gaycat6:

Scream interests me, but overanalyzing moments like the one from Scream 2 is a bit weird. Especially since the franchise has never branded itself as being super realistic or whatnot :michael:

Posted

It has nothing to do with expecting realism but the fact is it’s a plot hole.. they could’ve just not included that conversation in that scene and it still would’ve worked. They clearly just didn’t realize it made no logical sense in its current iteration or just didn’t care. 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Wrecked said:

Why are you so pressed? Somebody asked a simple question because they noticed something upon rewatching and I simply said it’s just a plot hole, which then lead to other people adding their opinions which they’re entitled to do on a forum.


I don’t think anybody going into a Scream movie is expecting realism. :rip:

I'm pressed? You didn't "simply say it's just a plot hole", you've made nearly 10 posts about it now :deadbanana:

Posted
26 minutes ago, TheOnlyOne said:

They included that scene because it was a major talking point of the first movie and how batshit insensitive it was to compare your mom leaving you vs Sid's mom dying. It was literally just about the metaness of that talking point and having Tori Spelling and Luke Wilson cameo. 

 

My god, go watch a documentary if you want realism so badly instead of obsessively critiquing the most mundane thing from nearly 30 years ago :rip:

This

  • ATRL Moderator
Posted

Not to derail anything, but I always kind of thought it’d be cool if they showed scenes from Stab 2 and Stab 3 (assuming the third film got completely remade following the events of Scream 3) 

 

I know some people are on the fence when it comes to sequels using Stab or not, but it could be such a kii if they cast someone ridiculous to play Sam’s character in a Stab movie or limited series (just for a cameo though like Heather Graham’s scene or Tori Spelling’s) 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.