burninredhot Posted February 29 Posted February 29 The real question is why'd you think people will stop travelling to other countries in 50 years
Arrows Posted February 29 Posted February 29 Yes. And so is existing and most joyful things in life. Don’t feel bad for traveling, it brings a lot of good and connection in the world.
G.U.Y. Posted February 29 Posted February 29 Don't know about tourism, but Taylorism is bad for the environment. 3 4
Into The Void Posted February 29 Posted February 29 No we save money so we can travel and see beautiful sights of the world. Its corporations and Billionaires who r ruining the environment
glitch Posted February 29 Posted February 29 Well yes but I don't see it stopping anytime soon. I would like to see more people going on holiday within their own countries though. Just looking at how many sad, forgotten seaside towns we have in the UK that used to be such a hive of activity is kinda depressing.
vale9001 Posted February 29 Posted February 29 Yes. In the natural state there is any reason if you are born in India to go to new York to visit another country for "pleasure". And viceversa. It's something humans like to do even if their natural state and their evolution didn't give their bodies the "instruments" to do it. Only way we can make it Is with objects esternal to us, we created and are very pollutants. 1
Leptine Posted February 29 Posted February 29 The real question is, what is not bad for the enviroment nowadays? Everything is.
Princess Aurora Posted February 29 Posted February 29 I think the way our society is built is bad for the environment....
shimind Posted February 29 Posted February 29 Without tourism, most of the european countries would still be stuck in the mediaeval times 1
Trent W Posted February 29 Posted February 29 Almost anything you do is bad for the environment But what we do is not even 5% of the problem Corporations are the ones destroying the system Is time to stop putting the finger at individuals when then real problem are those companies 1
simplywohoo Posted February 29 Posted February 29 44 minutes ago, Leptine said: The real question is, what is not bad for the enviroment nowadays? Everything is. Nowadays? It has ALWAYS been
Phaunzie Posted February 29 Posted February 29 Yes, tourist tend to use 4x amount of electricity and water than locals. Coming from a Barbadian perspective.
Tropez Posted February 29 Posted February 29 Taking trains is fine for instance. Plan and boats are pretty bad. So perhaps its better to take a train to visit places. If its too far, then just don't go for the environment.
Comedor Posted February 29 Posted February 29 Yes, if the people in charge are stupid and greed. No, if they are competent and know what they are doing. When management is done correctly, the money from tourism helps to keep the place in order and developed. 1
dussel_06 Posted February 29 Posted February 29 Yes, if countries are requiring tourist visas. I mean the amount of paper works being used. It could save a lot of trees.
Gorjesspazze9 Posted February 29 Posted February 29 No different then having your homes built on grounds that use to be forest 🤷♀️
Vitaly Posted February 29 Posted February 29 3 hours ago, shimind said: Without tourism, most of the european countries would still be stuck in the mediaeval times They still are but with more attractive facade
Recommended Posts