bjorn Posted February 22 Posted February 22 Sabrina Morrisey who is this *****? is she another Jamie Spears? 4
Miley Cyrus Posted February 22 Posted February 22 Isn't the lifetime documentary coming out in 2 days? Can they really block it by then? 1
Vermillion Posted February 22 Author Posted February 22 Just now, bjorn said: Sabrina Morrisey who is this *****? is she another Jamie Spears? Remember the name. Regardless of her having a stronger case with the medical diagnosis, I smell BS in terms of payouts. Just because Wendy was saved from Kevin Sr. and other clingers trying to rob her blind, doesn’t mean that Wells Fargo, etc. was and is out for her best interest either. Unfortunately the filing’s under seal.
Mordecai Posted February 22 Posted February 22 2 minutes ago, Miley Cyrus said: Isn't the lifetime documentary coming out in 2 days? Can they really block it by then? It'll probably be an interlocutory application (AKA a temporary order to block its release until a permanent decision is made) OT: It is STRANGE how a complete random gets to become Wendy's guardian. Wendy's sister is a lawyer, I am more than sure that she would be an appropriate guardian 1
Moloko Plus Posted February 22 Posted February 22 The hearing takes place after the documentary’s release date and A&E aren't providing comment… I wonder if they’ll still go ahead with release Not surprised it’s the random conservator appointee trying to block release considering Wendy’s family members have nothing positive to say about her
TaggedGalaxy Posted February 22 Posted February 22 This guardianship isn't sitting right with me, something shady is going on and they are definitely trying to hide something by attempting to block this documentary, they don't want a Britney situation 12
Vermillion Posted February 22 Author Posted February 22 Kevin Hunter Jr.’s AMEX charges seem to have a been a big instigator in her getting a conservator but I certainly trust him more than some other members of her family talking to the press. And I don’t trust the reports that it was her decision alone to cut off contact from Kevin Hunter Jr. during his senior year in college. She still let him use her card for college payments so there’s so much that’s not adding up. https://blavity.com/entertainment/kevin-hunter-jr-charged-wendy-williams-amex-to-pay-treatment Now playing devils advocate, where the conservator may have the upper hand is that there’s been accusations that this documentary is going to be exploitative - what they’re probably going to argue is that the family insist that Wendy said this was OK but the conservator will argue she’s not in the right mind to make that decision in the first place.
Pud Posted February 22 Posted February 22 Tbh I don’t think this documentary should be coming out now. It was clearly filmed 2 years ago when Wendy was in a terrible place and not sober. Any true Wendy fan knows she would NEVER film without her wig on. And the whole “she was an executive producer” argument is bs. She clearly did not have the mental capacity to properly consent to this. Exploitation at its finest 1 2
Twixters Posted February 22 Posted February 22 Wells Fargo guardian?!! How the hell a bank step in and do this?!!! Lemme cancel my account with them thats scary as ****
Mordecai Posted February 23 Posted February 23 18 minutes ago, Pud said: Tbh I don’t think this documentary should be coming out now. It was clearly filmed 2 years ago when Wendy was in a terrible place and not sober. Any true Wendy fan knows she would NEVER film without her wig on. And the whole “she was an executive producer” argument is bs. She clearly did not have the mental capacity to properly consent to this. Exploitation at its finest This could be somewhat exploitative but if this is a Britney situation where the documentary will really publicise what she's been going through (which I imagine might be part of the reason it exists) then any negatives might be outweighed by the benefits 2
Dula Peep Posted February 23 Posted February 23 imagine someone working for the bank controlling your life decisions... #FREEWENDY 1
DuffStan Posted February 23 Posted February 23 Scary situation, how someone so powerful can go down like this? Even her family can't seem to be able to help her
toxicgenie Posted February 23 Posted February 23 There needs to be more regulations for guardianships. I don't think a bank should be anyone's guardian.
Apolonio ₃₄ Posted February 23 Posted February 23 1 hour ago, Pud said: Tbh I don’t think this documentary should be coming out now. It was clearly filmed 2 years ago when Wendy was in a terrible place and not sober. Any true Wendy fan knows she would NEVER film without her wig on. And the whole “she was an executive producer” argument is bs. She clearly did not have the mental capacity to properly consent to this. Exploitation at its finest Exactly.
ATRL Moderator wehavetostan Posted February 23 ATRL Moderator Posted February 23 Wendy’s sister should be her guardian, based off of interviews with different family members I believe she would be the most trustworthy 1
Pud Posted February 23 Posted February 23 9 hours ago, Mordecai said: This could be somewhat exploitative but if this is a Britney situation where the documentary will really publicise what she's been going through (which I imagine might be part of the reason it exists) then any negatives might be outweighed by the benefits Let’s hope so… But it seems like all of this footage is 2022, pre-guardianship. Wendy’s niece said she spoke with her on the phone & that she is doing much better now. I’m sure the guardianship is somewhat unethical - isolating her from her family etc… But if she is now healthier and away from the people who allowed her to be filmed in this state, maybe it’s not entirely a bad thing
Sugar-Rush Posted February 23 Posted February 23 Sounds like she's being exploited by everyone around her.
Recommended Posts