Saintlor Posted January 30 Posted January 30 (edited) Obviously, it's not a song anyone would choose to listen to, but imagine how good this will be in the future? Will we ever be able to trust songwriting/producing credits? We barely can these days already Edited January 30 by Saintlor
Popular Post xokuba Posted January 30 Popular Post Posted January 30 (edited) This is another one Edited January 30 by xokuba 24
Cruel Summer Posted January 30 Posted January 30 I hope we’re soon able to spread technology that allows for somewhat reliable proof of some sort that a human has made a given piece of art, music or otherwise. Hearing this, I think it’s clear that even if you’re the kind of person who doesn’t object to AI consuming creative outlets while doing little to help our actual daily lives, you’ll still need a human in the loop to ensure that a track isn’t just… incredibly generic. After all, large AI models tend toward broad patterns and likely outcomes. I think that’s what makes it hard for me to understand why people would enjoy material like this. It’s just completely average - even literally, statistically average for whatever prompts were used. So who made it? Whose genuine lived experience influenced this? Not a single soul. 1
ATRL Moderator feelslikeadream Posted January 30 ATRL Moderator Posted January 30 Title: "decent song" OP: "Obviously, it's not a song anyone would choose to listen to" 4
Saintlor Posted January 30 Author Posted January 30 (edited) 1 hour ago, Cruel Summer said: I hope we’re soon able to spread technology that allows for somewhat reliable proof of some sort that a human has made a given piece of art, music or otherwise. Hearing this, I think it’s clear that even if you’re the kind of person who doesn’t object to AI consuming creative outlets while doing little to help our actual daily lives, you’ll still need a human in the loop to ensure that a track isn’t just… incredibly generic. After all, large AI models tend toward broad patterns and likely outcomes. I think that’s what makes it hard for me to understand why people would enjoy material like this. It’s just completely average - even literally, statistically average for whatever prompts were used. So who made it? Whose genuine lived experience influenced this? Not a single soul. Honestly, I love Max Martin's work he does for singers and I love Taylor's work, but I would consider their art to be very paint by the numbers. For example, if you asked a future AI to make a Taylor Swift song, a song like S**t! would be made Edited January 30 by Saintlor
PillowCase Posted January 30 Posted January 30 AI will give us the dark RedOne pop bops Gaga has been withholding since 2011.
WildOne Posted January 30 Posted January 30 yeahhhh as a songwriter/producer this is horrifying… why can’t they focus on making AI do functional tasks instead of creative ones?
imani Posted January 30 Posted January 30 Something is so wrong with this world. I will always find it off-putting how these people are fine (some eager) with replacing our creatives or making their lives harder than it already is. AI/Technology should be used to make our lives easier, so that we don't have to sacrifice our passion & mental health because our desires wouldn't pay the bills.
spree Posted January 30 Posted January 30 it's not bad. Sounds like something you'd hear on BPM on SiriusFM while cruising on the highway. It's good background music.
Trent W Posted January 30 Posted January 30 (edited) This has been around for around like a year and no one cares I used it and the tracks are incredibly generic and hace absolutely zero substance I know people are like 1-2 years they will do But AI is nothing but mathematical models that imitate human emotion They might never have a feeling attached I do think producers and actual musicians will benefit Edited January 30 by Trent W
Trent W Posted January 30 Posted January 30 16 minutes ago, WildOne said: yeahhhh as a songwriter/producer this is horrifying… why can’t they focus on making AI do functional tasks instead of creative ones? I think the same, it’s horrible. AI should be used only for stuff like accounting o customer service Stuff that no human wants to do It’s extremely suspicious why creative is the first area they targeted with AI
chessguy99 Posted January 30 Posted January 30 31 minutes ago, Trent W said: I think the same, it’s horrible. AI should be used only for stuff like accounting o customer service Stuff that no human wants to do It’s extremely suspicious why creative is the first area they targeted with AI Because if there is no creative aspect, it's just a computer program that works like any other computer program, following the coded process it is given. What makes AI programs truly intelligence is the ability to expand beyond the coded processes. This requires creativity.
Trent W Posted January 30 Posted January 30 8 minutes ago, chessguy99 said: Because if there is no creative aspect, it's just a computer program that works like any other computer program, following the coded process it is given. What makes AI programs truly intelligence is the ability to expand beyond the coded processes. This requires creativity. Makes sense It still needs to come up with stuff, so far it’s just imitation of human. Everything so far is just a replica of other’s people work
Gov Hooka Posted January 31 Posted January 31 This just makes me want to exclusively listen to music from before the 2020s electronic music is SCREWED
.thumb.gif.220e09e9e6ff29eae920635374b22fce.gif)
Recommended Posts