Blue Monday Posted January 8 Posted January 8 34 minutes ago, Dark Miracles said: Jolie didn't even win Volpi Cup at Venice so it's not like she was ever looking dominant Neither did Natalie Portman or Kristen Stewart; this was supposed to be Angelina's big return, which was what was fueling most of the hype behind her performance, and the fact Portman and Stewart got in for Larraín movies. Maria just wasn't good enough 1
Blue Monday Posted January 8 Posted January 8 9 minutes ago, fridayteenage said: Aronofsky got Portman an Oscar, got fraser an Oscar Larrain couldn't even get Portman a globe Angelina had a much stronger pre-release narrative than Natalie did in her year tbh. All I was saying was that it seemed like Angelina had everything in her corner only for it to completely evaporate as the movie started to become more widely seen. 1
Dark Miracles Posted January 8 Posted January 8 6 minutes ago, Blue Monday said: Neither did Natalie Portman or Kristen Stewart; this was supposed to be Angelina's big return, which was what was fueling most of the hype behind her performance, and the fact Portman and Stewart got in for Larraín movies. Maria just wasn't good enough Wait Natalie didn't win Volpi for Jackie? I could've sworn she did cuz her acclaim was massive out of its first festival screening. Or did it premiere at TIFF? Either way I still love watching her performance 1
Blue Monday Posted January 8 Posted January 8 2 minutes ago, Dark Miracles said: Wait Natalie didn't win Volpi for Jackie? I could've sworn she did cuz her acclaim was massive out of its first festival screening. Or did it premiere at TIFF? Either way I still love watching her performance She did not; Emma Stone won for La La Land that year. Jackie won Venice's screenplay prize though. I still maintain Natalie should have been the winner if Amy Adams wasn't in play and Viola Davis stayed in Supporting.
Deactivatedos Posted January 8 Posted January 8 These SAG nods.. oh I was in denial! Firstly, goodbye to Sing Sing, Angelina Jolie, and Selena Gomez! Happy to see the A Complete Unknown and Monica Barbaro get some love! ALSO LETS ******* GO PAM ANDERSON!!!!!!!!!!! I nEED her to get the Oscar nod!!! Jamie Lee is one of my all time fave actors (Laurie Strode is the all time slasher protagonist), but can awards bodies stop nominating/awarding Curtis over my personal faves in a year (Stephanie Hsu and Margaret Qualley you both were SO deserving of WINS IN SUPPORTING). Jeremy Strong has GG + probably BAFTA + SAG ... he very much can show up over Clarence Maclin (travesty, Maclin should be WINNING). Supporting Actor this year is whatecver to me cus Maclin, Eydelshteyn, and Tucci are all deserving of nods. 1
Hector Posted January 8 Posted January 8 21 minutes ago, choerry said: When do BAFTA noms come out? Next Wednesday with Oscar nominations out the following Friday. 1
hausofdave Posted January 8 Posted January 8 Kapadia for the "surprise" Thomas Vinteberg type of nom. First time since 1997 to be an all newbie line up 1
DanyelP23 Posted January 8 Posted January 8 Thinking of Moore's winning chances at SAG after The Substance missed Qualley and DGA, I looked up SAG Best Actress winners who were their movie's sole nominee at SAG in the last 25 years. We have 10 / 25 (40%) nominees who were the only SAG nomination (and also win) for their movies. 5/10 (50%) of the list played a real person, 100% of those 5 went on to win the Oscar. 5/10 (50%) played a fictional character. 60% (3) went on to win the Oscar. These actresses were: 1. Julianne Moore, Still Alice -> only nomination for the movie, weak category, overdue narrative 2. Cate Blanchette, Blue Jasmine -> due/overdue narrative, swept all precursors, the TRIFECTA and most of the regionals 3. Halle Berry, Monster' Ball -> movie that might have appealed to the white audiences of its time, I'm unaware what her narrative was around her other than a historic FIRST win for black women in the category I honestly don't know where Moore would fit in here. Especially given the genre of her film (to be fair, Yeoh and Stone were also in 'genre' movies in a way, but both of their movies won 4+ Oscars in total and had 11 noms each. However at SAG, Stone did not have ensemble and lost, while EEAO won all the categories it was nominated in) Ughhh I don't know what to think 1
hausofdave Posted January 8 Posted January 8 Culkin Norton Borisov Pearce Strong Unless Snub Snub has a resurgence for Maclin, this seems like the five.
fridayteenage Posted January 9 Posted January 9 Halles competition was spacek, previous winner in a supporting role that had no shot at any other win
Blade Runner Posted January 9 Posted January 9 Villeneuve not getting anywhere is sick and disgusting. Literally pathetic and makes no sense at all. Also, SAG is a lazy organization. 1 2
Hector Posted January 9 Posted January 9 9 minutes ago, fridayteenage said: Halles competition was spacek, previous winner in a supporting role that had no shot at any other win The Best Actress race of 2001-2002 was pretty competitive though: 01 Halle Berry SAG 02 Sissy Spacek Drama Golden Globe, Critics Choice, American Film Institute, Independent Spirit Award 03 Judi Dench BAFTA 04 Nicole Kidman Musical/Comedy Golden Globe 05 Renee Zellweger I think it was a closer race between Berry & Spacek than we think with Judi a potential dark horse winner.
Blade Runner Posted January 9 Posted January 9 3 hours ago, Dark Miracles said: How the **** is Javier Bardem nominated instead of Cooper Koch this makes literally zero sense 4
Jude Posted January 9 Posted January 9 I have a strong feeling Ariana is winning the supporting actress category. Wicked is winning best cast.
hausofdave Posted January 9 Posted January 9 A24 deserves to be raked over the coals for their handling of Sunb Snub. To not even get a SAG ensemble nom out of that movie in the end? Complete and utter failure. 2 1
Hector Posted January 9 Posted January 9 6 minutes ago, hausofdave said: A24 deserves to be raked over the coals for their handling of Sunb Snub. To not even get a SAG ensemble nom out of that movie in the end? Complete and utter failure. The botched theatrical release didn't make things better. Premiering at TIFF in 2023 and not capitalizing on a film festival circuit or a Q4 release in 2023 or 2024? 1
Green Posted January 9 Posted January 9 5 hours ago, Riot said: Just in time to change some winners at the last minute I'm still having nightmares about that Glenn Close/Lady Gaga tie Hopefully they change their votes for Best Actress and vote for Demi Moore after her GG win instead of Madison 1
Kylizzle Posted January 9 Posted January 9 2 hours ago, Blade Runner said: Villeneuve not getting anywhere is sick and disgusting. Literally pathetic and makes no sense at all. Also, SAG is a lazy organization. Zendaya needs to change her name to Aendaya quickly 5
kimberly Posted January 9 Posted January 9 1 minute ago, Kylizzle said: Zendaya needs to change her name to Aendaya quickly or just use her last name like everyone else Zendaya Coleman 1
fridayteenage Posted January 9 Posted January 9 (edited) 2 hours ago, Hector said: The Best Actress race of 2001-2002 was pretty competitive though: 01 Halle Berry SAG 02 Sissy Spacek Drama Golden Globe, Critics Choice, American Film Institute, Independent Spirit Award 03 Judi Dench BAFTA 04 Nicole Kidman Musical/Comedy Golden Globe 05 Renee Zellweger I think it was a closer race between Berry & Spacek than we think with Judi a potential dark horse winner. a movie that literally was only nominated for acting and Broadbent was going to win. 2 acting Oscars for a 3-nom film. I believe that has absolutely zero precedent. jukebox musical romcom they were all out-out. Berry and spacek were pretty close because of racism, yes, but the supporting role + already having an Oscar + not being a contender to win anything else were able to push past that. In my opinion the 3 closest races this century in actress were the victories for Yeoh, Berry, and Cotillard. all edging past previous winners. Edited January 9 by fridayteenage 1
choerry Posted January 9 Posted January 9 I know this absolutely isn't the focus of what's going on with the fires, but this race is about to be thrown into even more chaos than it already was. All screenings & panels are probably going to be cancelled for the foreseeable future. The degree of devastation is heartbreaking. 3
Recommended Posts