Shelter Posted September 26, 2023 Posted September 26, 2023 3 minutes ago, Borsi said: Or maybe because it wasn't the time and place to do it? Maybe because she doesn't wanted him to ruin the concert? It's not about supporting circumcision or not... You don't do this at a concert. It’s not the first time she got angry about it
BrokenMachine Posted September 26, 2023 Posted September 26, 2023 (edited) Of course it was in Texas... and he looked so proud of himself Still, I don't get it, I couldn't clearly understand what was going on. If he did it because of her being Jewish... it's not a good look Edit: I read the article, and it was weird for him to do something like that, and yeah, going by the article I'm guessing it had some antisemite innuendo Edited September 26, 2023 by BrokenMachine
Revolution Posted September 26, 2023 Posted September 26, 2023 *male genital mutilation not circumcision 9 1 1 3
Vilko Posted September 26, 2023 Posted September 26, 2023 1) wtf 2) Hmmm.......... since this made the news it looks like he exactly got the attention he wanted and went to the concert for. If she didn't throw him out literally nobody would know anything about this 2
BrokenMachine Posted September 26, 2023 Posted September 26, 2023 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Shelter said: It’s not the first time she got angry about it 'Mocking' Jews for circumcision is a thing in antisemite circles so I'm guessing that's why she takes it personal Edited September 26, 2023 by BrokenMachine 1
Borsi Posted September 26, 2023 Posted September 26, 2023 1 minute ago, Shelter said: It’s not the first time she got angry about it I don't know what are you trying to say, but whatever. What was she supposed to do? Smile? Letting him stay at the front row knowing that he's a hater and can cause another scene later? 1
aaron511 Posted September 26, 2023 Posted September 26, 2023 Since when is circumcision controversial? Aren't like 99% of American men circumsized? Y'all find a way to be offended by everything. Besides she and her family are Jewish... 8 1
Popular Post NausAllien Posted September 26, 2023 Popular Post Posted September 26, 2023 12 minutes ago, Mr. Mendes said: Maybe that’s not how your culture works, but it’s how most of the culture here does. You don’t have to like it, but calling it genital mutilation when there are a multitude of health benefits, and many men get it by choice, is wild. THIS IS AN OUTRIGHT LIE The only health benefit that has been found is a reduced risk of HIV infection among men, and most trials have only been conducted in Africa (South Africa, Kenya, Uganda). Do you honestly think it's okay to mutilate a sex organ just because it marginally reduced the risk of HIV infection rather than, I don't know, prevent these infections by using codoms? I don't know what kind of PROPOGANDA pro-genial-mutilation advocates are spreading there in the US, but it's not scientific. It's just a bunch of myths from the 19th C. that have been perpetuated for generations. 19 5 1 2
Miss Show Business Posted September 26, 2023 Posted September 26, 2023 5 minutes ago, Shelter said: It’s 2023. You’d think people would have some more sense now to not just go a long with something because it was the thing to do back then. It’s mostly not needed and some gross thing to do because of religion or because “daddy is cut” so my son will be too. It's 2023, yet here y'all are, incapable of scientific literacy and being able to find the research that points to it's benefits and lack of any side effects. This is not something that's debatable - this has been common practice and studied for DECADES in the US. It is the opinion by many pediatricians and urologists, to my understanding, that the benefit outweighs the risk of the procedure. This is common practice, again, because of decades of research, not because of cosmetic reasons. And calling cut men - who otherwise have no problem with themselves - "mutilated", is body shaming, and projecting your apparent insecurities onto somebody else. I'm SO sick and tired of scientifically illiterate mobs of people watching a YouTube video, reading a Facebook post, or watching a TikTok, filled with misinformation and just running with it without any critical thinking skills whatsoever. You may was well say you're anti vaccine, too. You don't get to disagree with science when it shows you evidence you don't like. 7 25
Revolution Posted September 26, 2023 Posted September 26, 2023 8 minutes ago, BrokenMachine said: 'Mocking' Jews for circumcision is a thing in antisemite circles so I'm guessing that's why she takes it personal 7 minutes ago, Braz said: Thats pure antisemitism cmon now... Except most of the male genital mutilation (MGM) practitioners in America (where this occurred) are Christians, who do it for backwards puritanical anti-sexual pleasure reasons. ot: my body, my choice. 7 1 1
Power love Posted September 26, 2023 Posted September 26, 2023 (edited) It’s Pink show & she can do whatever she wants. Yes queen buy that bag with his concert ticket I remember getting into a fight in the club having this debate with a stranger. That beep pulled my roots! Edited September 26, 2023 by Power love 1
Popular Post canyonmoon Posted September 26, 2023 Popular Post Posted September 26, 2023 Whether you think it's "genital mutilation" or not, the lack of consent is a problem. Infants can't consent to an unnecessary, cosmetic procedure. 20 2
BrokenMachine Posted September 26, 2023 Posted September 26, 2023 7 minutes ago, Revolution said: Except most of the male genital mutilation (MGM) practitioners in America (where this occurred) are Christians, who do it for backwards puritanical anti-sexual pleasure reasons. ot: my body, my choice. Except P!nk is Jewish herself, that guy of course knew about it and tried to mock her with that thing 2
NausAllien Posted September 26, 2023 Posted September 26, 2023 1 minute ago, canyonmoon said: Whether you think it's "genital mutilation" or not, the lack of consent is a problem. Infants can't consent to an unnecessary, cosmetic procedure. That's why in my initial comment I wrote that INFANT circumcision is genital mutilation. An adult can do whatever they want with their body. But it shouldn't be allowed for parents to make such a massive and irreversible decision. They're their caretakers, not their owners. In fact, I'd go as far as to say that infant circumcision for non-medical reasons should be considered a HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION. 6 1 2
nostalgic Posted September 26, 2023 Posted September 26, 2023 45 minutes ago, Miss Show Business said: People who are obsessed with circumcision are the biggest weirdos I've ever seen. Everything these people have been told is lies that can easily be disproven in medical literature, and serves no other purpose other than to shame men's bodies for being what they perceive as "mutilated". Weirdo behavior. Touch grass. The Europeans and Latin Americans in this thread FUMING over our cut dicks nurse! 5 6 8
BrokenMachine Posted September 26, 2023 Posted September 26, 2023 Also, I don't support circumcision/male genital mutilation or whatever you wanna call it on infants. But also knowing how fascism, along hateful groups are on the rise in the US, and P!nk being Jewish, she did it right by kicking him out 2
Patient Zero Posted September 26, 2023 Posted September 26, 2023 1 hour ago, VOSS said: Wow what happened to freedom of speech Free speech is overrated and a double edged sword. A society with free speech won't work. I mean, circumsicion is also a form of "free speech" A religion practicing it is also falls under "free speech" They should be allowed to do it. I swear Elon Muskrat really dropped the IQ for some people to sub-zero with his free speech rants. 1
Popular Post cloudbusting Posted September 26, 2023 Popular Post Posted September 26, 2023 I get why she stays up in the air now, it’s pure chaos when she lands 28
Take Me Apart Posted September 26, 2023 Posted September 26, 2023 (edited) There’s such a strange online subculture of men that are obsessed with circumcision. I personally couldn’t care less about mine and despite what i’m being told by cheese harvesters I don’t "miss" something I can’t even remember. And I’m glad to be less at risk at catching STDs, not that I wasn’t playing safe to begin with. Edited September 26, 2023 by Take Me Apart 1 1 3
lyk251 Posted September 26, 2023 Posted September 26, 2023 (edited) I wish my parents have done it to me when i was a baby and my doctor don't try to save my foreskin in 5th grade .They cut my a small piece of my foreskin every summer for 3 years until i begged to have circumcision to end that , I still hurt when i thought about it. Edited September 26, 2023 by lyk251 1
Mystic Warrior Posted September 26, 2023 Posted September 26, 2023 (edited) 25 minutes ago, Patient Zero said: Free speech is overrated and a double edged sword. A society with free speech won't work. I mean, circumsicion is also a form of "free speech" A religion practicing it is also falls under "free speech" They should be allowed to do it. I swear Elon Muskrat really dropped the IQ for some people to sub-zero with his free speech rants. If you think the First Amendment is “overrated”, you don’t know what it is. Judging by your examples, you don’t. A religion being allowed to practice circumcisions on infants would fall under separation of church and state, if anything, not free speech. Circumcision in general is also not a form of “free speech”. I agree that forefront conservatives have misconstrued what the First Amendment is, but I would recommend brushing up on it yourself before insulting IQs. The First Amendment protects us from the government being able to censor us. It protects someone from having the opinion that circumcision is ethical/unethical, not that it is legal overall. Edited September 26, 2023 by Mystic Warrior
Patient Zero Posted September 26, 2023 Posted September 26, 2023 4 minutes ago, Mystic Warrior said: If you think the First Amendment is “overrated”, you don’t know what it is. Judging by your examples, you don’t. A religion being allowed to practice circumcisions on infants would fall under separation of church and state, if anything, not free speech. Circumcision in general is also not a form of “free speech”. I agree that forefront conservatives have misconstrued what the First Amendment is, but I would recommend brushing up on it yourself before insulting IQs. The First Amendment protects us from the government being able to censor us. It protects someone from having the opinion that circumcision is ethical/unethical, not that it is legal overall. I'm not from the USA so I don't know anything about the 1st amendment and its definition of free speech. All I'm saying is that free speech should't be used to provoke certain groups or used as hate speech. And that's what "free speech" all seems to be about now. 2
Recommended Posts