Jump to content

Page Six: Britney dating housekeeper Paul Soliz, source insists didn't cheat on Sam


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Miichael said:

I wouldn't bother trying to talk sense into them sis, the first sign they get of Britney doing something they don't approve of they jump at the chance to use it to justify 14+ years of abuse she went through, it's like all their birthday's coming at once for them, "finally an excuse for us to support Britney's abuse! We've been waiting for this! :duca:"

I did not realize how unhinged they were until now..  so I won't engage anymore.

 

Also, people need to stop thinking this situation is so black and white...

 

Britney can have issues she's still dealing with (as anyone with two eyes can see) without being some cracked out methhead that so many people want her to be.

 

  • Like 5

  • Replies 151
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Mystical

    17

  • crf13

    9

  • CarCAL22

    5

  • JustLikeHoney

    5

Posted

  wow
Kevin the best parent for the two boys :deadbanana:

  • Haha 2
  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, dlwlrma said:

  wow
Kevin the best parent for the two boys :deadbanana:

The swift report after not even one (1) minute :dies:

  • Haha 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, CarCAL22 said:

Also, people need to stop thinking this situation is so black and white...

Actually, you're the one thinking this :toofunny2: 

 

Two things can be true at once, you know? 1) The c-ship being abusive and extreme at the time 2) Britney currently being on meth and refusing any help

Posted

Oh Britney no girl wtf! 
 

Posted
3 hours ago, Espresso said:

 

can the people who reported this be banned.?

this is off subject but I'm so sick of seeing reports of literally news stories.

I don't think Karens should be a part of ATRL. 

they probably call the police on innocent black men in real life to bring guns to a non-existent situation

 

and yes im sure THIS is going to be reported...ugh!

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, xxxlamb said:

can the people who reported this be banned.?

this is off subject but I'm so sick of seeing reports of literally news stories.

I don't think Karens should be a part of ATRL. 

they probably call the police on innocent black men in real life to bring guns to a non-existent situation

 

and yes im sure THIS is going to be reported...ugh!

 

 

Not someone reporting you within SECONDS :deadbanana2: Damn, some of these people are truly oversensitive lunatics 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 8
Posted
Just now, Mystical said:

Not someone reporting you within SECONDS :deadbanana2: Damn, some of these people are truly oversensitive lunatics 

:rip::deadbanana2:

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, xxxlamb said:

can the people who reported this be banned.?

this is off subject but I'm so sick of seeing reports of literally news stories.

I don't think Karens should be a part of ATRL. 

they probably call the police on innocent black men in real life to bring guns to a non-existent situation

 

and yes im sure THIS is going to be reported...ugh!

 

 

what a disgustin comparation.

 

the post was reported because the title said one thing and the article said other thing. but you will know if you bother to read the article, there is a reason THE PERSON who did this thread only put the title and not the article it self 

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted

For the record, I’m the OP and I did NOT report that post :rip: 

 

The only topic ban on this forum that’s been instituted per a mod town hall which constitutes WP’s to my knowledge is on JK Rowling trans comments.

 

A source ban similar to Wikipedia’s on the Daily Mail was brought up briefly several years ago and was shot down.

 

I’m not invested either way and never have been. Although I would love room for longer titles. :coffee2:  

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Espresso said:

For the record, I’m the OP and I did NOT report that post :rip: 

 

The only topic ban on this forum that’s been instituted per a mod town hall which constitutes WP’s to my knowledge is on JK Rowling trans comments.

 

A source ban similar to Wikipedia’s on the Daily Mail was brought up briefly several years ago and was shot down.

 

I’m not invested either way and never have been. Although I would love room for longer titles. :coffee2:  

thanks for the post. the title i read matched the title and article that you provided 

 

everyone stream Unusual You...it's a bop :celestial:

Posted
49 minutes ago, Big Bad Wolf said:

Sounds like most celebrities……like, y’all have got to stop painting Britney as a mentally incapacitated teen

Yeah and how do most child stars end up?

 

Take the average child star, multiply it by 1000 times the attention/fame/scrutiny, add an extremely abusive and toxic family dynamic.

 

Now add a corrupt conservatorship where she was placed under her abusive family's control for 13 years and force fed high doses of incredibly powerful medications that seem to have more or less chemically lobotomized her.

 

How anyone expects her to be a healthy, functioning adult is beyond me.

 

  • Thanks 2
Posted

Lana del rey teas

Posted
41 minutes ago, Espresso said:

I’m not invested either way and never have been.

You really are the atrl version of the shade room… always positing inflammatory articles for the sake of discourse only to dip out as soon as you press “submit” like clockwork. :rip:

  • Like 3
  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted

She bonked her (now fired) house keeper. Y’all never bonked your ubereats delivery person or plumber? It’s a vibe.
 

Either sexless or everyone runs private investigator level background checks on their flings, apparently. 
 

Her security simply failed to do their job in this instance & the situation has been rectified, and she got good D and she’s sexy & single. The dramatics for what? 

 

giphy.webp?cid=6c09b952t2z2uib5tqirj379n

  • Like 4
  • Haha 1
Posted

PageSix is so damn shady :redface:

  • Like 1
Posted

You can take the girl out the trailer park but…

  • Haha 2
Posted
14 minutes ago, FOCK said:

She bonked her (now fired) house keeper. Y’all never bonked your ubereats delivery person or plumber? It’s a vibe.
 

 

the way I read this with Nicki's voice :deadbanana2:

 

FOCK

Posted
4 hours ago, kataraqueen said:

Just reading the article and talking about it is now a think piece ? 💀 lemme say it in a way that u can comprehend:

 

britney’s dumb

I know that’s right :clap3:

Posted
2 hours ago, crf13 said:

You really are the atrl version of the shade room… always positing inflammatory articles for the sake of discourse only to dip out as soon as you press “submit” like clockwork. :rip:

Dip out? I'm here, responding. The notion I'm obligated to defend their reporting is absurd.

 

Another thread from the Daily Mail that they aren't dating has already been posted. The same Daily Mail that's banned from being a Wiki source.

 

I post all articles on all celebrities, including speculation on Kevin moving to Hawaii to extend Britney's child support.

 

The Post's slant is not my problem. I don't have a slant and won't be your scapegoat.

 

If you want a change take it up with the mods. For the record, I've not received any WPs for posting this article.

Posted

She wanted to get dicked down by a Latino with a dad bod and lawless entanglements 

 

I’d assume gays would be the first to get it alas

  • Haha 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Big Bad Wolf said:

I mean?

 

It’s always everyone else BUT Britney. It’s KFed, it’s mom and dad, it’s Jamie Lynn, it’s Fe, it’s Larry, it’s her managers, it’s her lawyers, its Sam or whoever she’s with, it’s her kids…..

 

At one point do we stop painting her as a perpetual victim and start holding her accountability for her own shitty actions and decisions

 

It can’t be everyone else and not her atp. She is the common denominator

You almost had a point until you started appropriating social justice rhetoric for celebrity gossip. You can't "hold someone accountable" for having shitty taste in men fjdjdjd. 

 

You "hold someone accountable" when they inflict harm onto others, not when they make personal choices you'd never make. It's like saying you wanna hold Britney accountable for loving McDonalds and Red Bull. :rip:

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, Mystical said:

The most concerning thing to me is her dating a literal convicted drug dealer and her kids not talking to her at all. It’s a huge red flag.

Sis this is a form of parasocial relationship no different than the very stans you're mocking for being overtly and needlessly defensive that Britney likes a messy sex life. :rip:

 

"I'm just CONCERNED and SCARED for her LIFE"

 

Why does your brain even have the mental capacity to begin a kind of parasocial chain reaction that you're creating theories about her safety and mental health from finding out she got her kitty kat pounded by some nobody service worker? :rip:

 

She got her puss tore up and you're detailing theories of how such could relate to both her medical history and drug use? And such news is driving you to now research extensive interview coverage with her minor children to further expabd the puzzle? How much does Britney Spears mean to your life? :deadbanana4:

Edited by Communion
Posted

Dating a worker is messy as hell :deadbanana2:

 

Hope the PageSix's third insider is right and that they're no longer in contact, no criminals near her please.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.