Jump to content

AI-generated art can't be copyrighted under U.S. law, rules federal court


Recommended Posts

Posted

keyboard-660x330.png

 

Quote

A work of art created by artificial intelligence without any human input cannot be copyrighted under U.S. law, a U.S. court in Washington, D.C., has ruled.

 

Only works with human authors can receive copyrights, U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell said on Friday, affirming the Copyright Office’s rejection of an application filed by computer scientist Stephen Thaler on behalf of his DABUS system.

 

The fast-growing field of generative AI has raised novel intellectual property issues. The Copyright Office has also rejected an artist’s bid for copyrights on images generated through the AI system Midjourney despite the artist’s argument that the system was part of their creative process. [...] Reuters

 

Posted

 

  • Like 2
Posted

Lemme start shamelessly stealing ideas from these AI images and songs...

  • Like 2
Posted

Will.I.am and Myah Marie having a tantrum today

Posted

MANJOBI is shaking

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.