byzantium Posted August 18, 2023 Posted August 18, 2023 Transgender women banned from women's chess events https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-66538328 The International Chess Federation (FIDE) says it is temporarily banning transgender women from competing in its women's events. The FIDE said individual cases would require "further analysis" and that a decision could take up to two years ——————— Why does chess have gendered competitions anyways? 3
Gottasadae Posted August 18, 2023 Posted August 18, 2023 Chess only requires a brain activity, so what they trying to prove 2 1
ATRL Moderator Legend E Posted August 18, 2023 ATRL Moderator Posted August 18, 2023 Quote Why does chess have gendered competitions anyways? was about to ask. this reeks of misogyny (and transphobia of course) 1 1
LustSpell Posted August 18, 2023 Posted August 18, 2023 Transphobia and misogyny. There is no difference between between women and men mentally 8 1
Aston Martin Posted August 18, 2023 Posted August 18, 2023 Just now, Gottasadae said: Chess only requires a brain activity, so what they trying to prove Which should disqualify transphobes from competing since they're clearly lacking in it ot: this is foul. **** transphobes and **** anyone that supports this.
Bonicap Posted August 18, 2023 Posted August 18, 2023 (edited) 11 minutes ago, byzantium said: Why does chess have gendered competitions anyways? There are not exclusive male competitions on chess. There is one for everybody and, in big competitions, another one only for women, so women can choose which one they want to play. For example the best woman player of all time, Judit Polgar, only plays (or played) in mixed tournaments. Women-only competitions exist to promote the sport among women, because if they didn't exist the competitions would have 98 men and 2 women. If you are a top woman player you'll be playing against men 95% of the times. Edited August 18, 2023 by Bonicap 3
Digitalism Posted August 18, 2023 Posted August 18, 2023 The fact that there is women chess category is dumb here. 1
State of Grace. Posted August 18, 2023 Posted August 18, 2023 (edited) TERFs/Anti-trans fools: Supporting trans people and their right to participate in sports in actually misogynist! Also them: We have to ban trans women from women's chess because they are men and they are intellectually superior to women! not fair! We need to look into the differences in spatial cognition and brain chemistry! So you're telling me the anti-trans fools are also....anti-women? But I thought their transphobic attacks are meant to protect women? Edited August 18, 2023 by State of Grace. 6
loveisdead9582 Posted August 18, 2023 Posted August 18, 2023 … wtf? I kind of understand some of the mental gymnastics of banning trans athletes in certain sports but how the hell does this make sense? Chess relies on brain power - clearly something that these people don’t have enough of.
Sheep Posted August 18, 2023 Posted August 18, 2023 (edited) 13 minutes ago, byzantium said: Why does chess have gendered competitions anyways? 6 minutes ago, Legend E said: was about to ask. this reeks of misogyny (and transphobia of course) Because there was only ever been a few women to ever compete at the top level in all of history before they made a separate space for women. This policy is predicated on the idea that trans women aren't women. However it's also worth noting that "mens" chess has never excluded women. Edited August 18, 2023 by Century 1
Domination Posted August 18, 2023 Posted August 18, 2023 Lol, the optics of this story. Ban trans women from women’s division -> justify it with the explanation that they have a biological mental advantage over cis women. Do a away with women’s division all together -> women almost completely cease to a have a presence in competitive chess at all. What a mess! Just let trans women into the women’s division and deal with the blowback as it comes.
byzantium Posted August 18, 2023 Author Posted August 18, 2023 13 minutes ago, Bonicap said: There are not exclusive male competitions on chess. There is one for everybody and, in big competitions, another one only for women, so women can choose which one they want to play. For example the best woman player of all time, Judit Polgar, only plays (or played) in mixed tournaments. Women-only competitions exist to promote the sport among women, because if they didn't exist the competitions would have 98 men and 2 women. If you are a top woman player you'll be playing against men 95% of the times. This makes sense and thank you for the explanation. Though if the whole purpose of women tournaments is to promote chess among an underrepresented group…this ban seems odd.
Fitzswiftie Posted August 18, 2023 Posted August 18, 2023 They really do hate trans folks don’t they. Like at least some physical competition one could see their argument, this is petty, transphobic and misogynistic on the same way the terf reaction to trans woman winning Jeopardy and a Golden Globe were. 1
Tylerbv Posted August 18, 2023 Posted August 18, 2023 21 minutes ago, loveisdead9582 said: … wtf? I kind of understand some of the mental gymnastics of banning trans athletes in certain sports but how the hell does this make sense? Chess relies on brain power - clearly something that these people don’t have enough of. This is basically how I feel too. Although I might not fully agree, I understand the viewpoint of not letting trans women into physical sports.. but chess? If they can identify one male puberty aspect that makes AMAB people better at chess, I’d love to hear it 1
tshwark Posted August 18, 2023 Posted August 18, 2023 Mixed tournaments always existed, even in schools, however I don't see anything wrong in trans women competing against each other, it gives exposure, after all what is exactly to be a woman, wear pink, play with dolls, long hair, there's no need to cling to a gender.
Cruel Summer Posted August 18, 2023 Posted August 18, 2023 After some digging, this doesn’t seem to be based on any evidence that trans women have a biological advantage and seems rooted solely in transphobia. A 2009 research paper indicated that 96% of the difference in ranking/performance between men and women in chess is due to how many more men play chess than women, and I’ve found no evidence that the consensus on that matter has changed. Women’s chess events have the express purpose of trying to encourage greater participation in chess - not a purpose of segregating based on innate differences in ability. This is explicitly predicated upon the assumption that trans women don’t count as women, which is a perspective that should be pushed back against vocally. 1
byzantium Posted August 18, 2023 Author Posted August 18, 2023 2 minutes ago, Cruel Summer said: After some digging, this doesn’t seem to be based on any evidence that trans women have a biological advantage and seems rooted solely in transphobia. A 2009 research paper indicated that 96% of the difference in ranking/performance between men and women in chess is due to how many more men play chess than women, and I’ve found no evidence that the consensus on that matter has changed. Women’s chess events have the express purpose of trying to encourage greater participation in chess - not a purpose of segregating based on innate differences in ability. This is explicitly predicated upon the assumption that trans women don’t count as women, which is a perspective that should be pushed back against vocally. Exactly. The issue here is that people don’t acknowledge that trans people exists. I generally thing this is the major feeling underlying most of these sports “debates” but it’s undeniable here.
NEX Posted August 18, 2023 Posted August 18, 2023 Why are there gendered categories in the first place?
Headlock Posted August 18, 2023 Posted August 18, 2023 1 hour ago, State of Grace. said: So you're telling me the anti-trans fools are also....anti-women? But I thought their transphobic attacks are meant to protect women? Oop
Recommended Posts