Jump to content

Naomi, Cindy, Linda & Christy Remember The Dawn Of The Supermodel Era


Recommended Posts

Posted

Linda looks snatched :clap3:

  • Like 3
Posted

seeing Linda made my day, she has that thing that just makes me happy,

  • Like 1
Posted

19920401.jpg

 

icons.

 

i wonder why claudia hasn't had a comeback.

  • Like 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, fridayteenage said:

i wonder why claudia hasn't had a comeback.

oh yeah, love her too.

Posted

J.Lo kind of eats them all up. :rip:

  • Haha 1
  • Thumbs Down 7
Posted

Kendall, Gigi, and Bella could never

  • Like 2
Posted

Christy :jonnycat:

Posted

Linda still giving face I see

Posted

Claudia should've been there too for that big 5 throwback moment

  • Like 2
Posted

Numbers of US covers, solo or duo:

Cindy 16 (1986+)

Linda 10 (1988+)

Christy 5 (1990+)

Naomi 5 (1989+)

 

Amber Valletta 14 (1993+)

Claudia 13 (1990+)

Gisele 10 (1999+)

Kate 7 (1995+)

Karen Mulder 7 (1991+)

Estelle Lefebure 7 (1986+)

Tatjana 6 (1987+)

Paulina 6 (1986+)

Carolyn Murphy 5 (1997+)

 

Rihanna 7 (2011+)

Sarah Jessica Parker 7 (2002+)

Nicole Kidman 7 (1999+)

Gwyneth 7 (1996+)

Charlize 6 (2000+)

Reese 6 (2003+)

Cate 5 (2000+)

Renee 5 (1998+)

Sandra 5 (1998+)

Angelina 5 (2002+)

Keira 5 (2005+)

Rih and Carrie Bradshaw their faves this century.

Posted

Madonna was the first non model/actress to cover US Vogue in 1989.

Posted

THESE are supermodels. THESE are timeless women. Classic women. Love seeing them shine together.

Posted

Legendary. Wish Claudia was there tho 

Posted

all these women still look and model so incredibly. honorary mention for Yasmeen Ghauri, 90's Supermodel Icon who often gets overlooked. 

  • Like 3
Posted
9 minutes ago, WEEKND said:

Legendary. Wish Claudia was there tho 

I wish Gia could've had the opportunity to be part of this, too.

  • Like 2
Posted

ICONS all of them. Ugh. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

They were THE ultimate supermodels. Nobody ever came close to them.

Posted
On 8/12/2023 at 10:28 AM, ICLDXU4HS said:

J.Lo kind of eats them all up. :rip:

jlo%202023.jpg

 

... anyway

 

You can age in what ever way you want, but such unmistakable charisma will always be there! That being said look gorgeous

Posted
14 hours ago, fridayteenage said:

Numbers of US covers, solo or duo:

Cindy 16 (1986+)

Linda 10 (1988+)

Christy 5 (1990+)

Naomi 5 (1989+)

 

Amber Valletta 14 (1993+)

Claudia 13 (1990+)

Gisele 10 (1999+)

Kate 7 (1995+)

Karen Mulder 7 (1991+)

Estelle Lefebure 7 (1986+)

Tatjana 6 (1987+)

Paulina 6 (1986+)

Carolyn Murphy 5 (1997+)

 

Rihanna 7 (2011+)

Sarah Jessica Parker 7 (2002+)

Nicole Kidman 7 (1999+)

Gwyneth 7 (1996+)

Charlize 6 (2000+)

Reese 6 (2003+)

Cate 5 (2000+)

Renee 5 (1998+)

Sandra 5 (1998+)

Angelina 5 (2002+)

Keira 5 (2005+)

Rih and Carrie Bradshaw their faves this century.

Idg what these numbers mean

Did for example Rihanna have 7 covers from 2011 onwards for British Vogue? 

 

Because then these numbers may not be accurate, as Naomi has 8 UK vogue covers

http://voguescovers.blogspot.com/p/naomi-campbell.html

Posted
On 8/12/2023 at 4:28 AM, ICLDXU4HS said:

J.Lo kind of eats them all up. :rip:

gettyimages-1486918729-645041bc803a3.jpg

cindycrawford_289036803_1256346815196815

CT%2520Air.jpg

Linda-Evangelista-models-fendi-ss-post.j

 

you were saying.

  • Like 1
Posted

Wasn’t Naomi linked to Epstein 

  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Cheers said:

Wasn’t Naomi linked to Epstein 

and what does that have to do with this thread? :huh:

oh yeah, nothing.

Posted
12 minutes ago, mons†er said:

gettyimages-1486918729-645041bc803a3.jpg

cindycrawford_289036803_1256346815196815

CT%2520Air.jpg

Linda-Evangelista-models-fendi-ss-post.j

 

you were saying.

They’re all stunning women and still look fantastic, that goes without saying and wasn’t what I meant. They all look a few older older than they are to me with the exception of Naomi. I’d expect different given the fact that their looks are their job and I’d assume they’ve taken exceptional care of themselves over the years. Maybe it’s just what a lifetime of supermodel skinniness does to you. Christy and Cindy look like women in their early/mid-60s who look great for their age.

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, ICLDXU4HS said:

They’re all stunning women and still look fantastic, that goes without saying and wasn’t what I meant. They all look a few older older than they are to me with the exception of Naomi. I’d expect different given the fact that their looks are their job and I’d assume they’ve taken exceptional care of themselves over the years. Maybe it’s just what a lifetime of supermodel skinniness does to you. Christy and Cindy look like women in their early/mid-60s who look great for their age.

you brought up J.Lo, there was no need to mention her in this thread or even compare her beauty to theirs. These women still look the same, considering how plastic surgery has made MANY models shift their entire image and become unrecognizable. These 4 women have aged beautifully and Jennifer is lucky to even have the effortless beauty of any of these 4 women. J.Lo is a beautiful woman but not naturally. she has really bad skin and you can tell she hasn't taken the best care of it. Jennifer will not age as gracefully or be as remembered for her beauty and contribution to the shift in not only her respective field, but in how the world views beauty and women.

Edited by mons†er
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.