Jump to content

YouTube bans the channel of an 11 year old girl in North Korea


Recommended Posts

Posted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted
Quote

Silicon Valley wants war & is determined to censor voices that could help create peace.

That's hilarious. Meanwhile countries like, checks notes, North Korea will ban entire platforms to no pushback

Posted

Because it's an 11 year old girl who's an actress working for the Communist government. It's just propaganda and child abuse. A regular North Korean citizen has no access to internet outside the country. 

  • Like 5
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted

The videos are up on some archive channels that have been uploaded recently lol 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Illuminati said:

That's hilarious. Meanwhile countries like, checks notes, North Korea will ban entire platforms to no pushback

"I disagree with this thing and thus will do the exact same thing myself to show much I disagree with it!!!!"

Posted

Not KPR_Brasil :deadbanana2:

Posted
42 minutes ago, Communion said:

"I disagree with this thing and thus will do the exact same thing myself to show much I disagree with it!!!!"

Should I even be surprised that you defend child abuse in the name of yet another dictatorship :toofunny3:

Posted
2 hours ago, Illuminati said:

Should I even be surprised that you defend child abuse in the name of yet another dictatorship :toofunny3:

Child abuse?

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Taylena said:

Because it's an 11 year old girl who's an actress working for the Communist government. It's just propaganda and child abuse. A regular North Korean citizen has no access to internet outside the country. 

everything coming from the US is propaganda when it comes to north korea

 

FwnYU1CaMAIG9pt.jpg

 

Edited by Asscatchem
  • Haha 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Asscatchem said:

everything coming from the US is propaganda when it comes to north korea

 

FwnYU1CaMAIG9pt.jpg

 

The NK article even names the organization that hired these child actors

 

FwnYU1CaMAIG9pt.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, Illuminati said:

The NK article even names the organization that hired these child actors

 

FwnYU1CaMAIG9pt.jpg

and there's an organization that hired the article writers, your point?

 

FwnYU1CaMAIG9pt.jpg

Posted

No to propaganda :clap3:

Posted

Just out of my own obsession with North Korea, I would have liked for the channels to be kept up. But I understand the reasoning behind it.

Posted
3 hours ago, Illuminati said:

that you defend

Quote

Google, which owns YouTube, confirmed the removal of the two vlogger channels to Voice of America on Monday, stating that it took this action in compliance with U.S. sanctions and trade restrictions related to North Korea.

Youtube = American companying banning the channels due to government sanctions

Voice of America = Literally a branch of the CIA

 

The vast majority of media companies in South Korea are either government-owned or government-subsidized.

 

If the vlogs were funded by the DPRK government, you put a disclaimer on it, not wipe them from the internet, proving via hypocrisy (that you cheered on!) that platitudes in the West about free speech are empty. :toofunny3:

  • Like 2
Posted
9 minutes ago, Communion said:

If the vlogs were funded by the DPRK government, you put a disclaimer on it, not wipe them from the internet, proving via hypocrisy (that you cheered on!) that platitudes in the West about free speech are empty. :toofunny3:

but I thought NK was supposed to be the country of censorship?

 

FwnYU1CaMAIG9pt.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

So can we see this free speech from North Korea by seeing other North Korean vloggers then?

FwnYU1CaMAIG9pt.jpg

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.