Da Vinci Posted June 11, 2023 Posted June 11, 2023 Now that I think about it, the bible has a lot of graphic violence and sexual content (sometimes non-consensual) so the hypocrisy is astounding (but not surprising) 5 1
Trent W Posted June 11, 2023 Posted June 11, 2023 6 minutes ago, Da Vinci said: Now that I think about it, the bible has a lot of graphic violence and sexual content (sometimes non-consensual) so the hypocrisy is astounding (but not surprising) This is true Its actually a lot more sexual rather than just books talking about gender or sexual identity
EnigmaticAndroid Posted June 11, 2023 Posted June 11, 2023 The insane cognitive dissonance from the MAGAt crowd "Yes it's inappropriate and has extreme references to sex and violence, but I want an exception"
Into The Void Posted June 11, 2023 Posted June 11, 2023 Tbh I've never thought of the Bible as sexually explicitl Interesting
Achilles. Posted June 13, 2023 Posted June 13, 2023 Always felt that there was horrifyingly little pushback against the book bannings, and that liberals organizing to give the conservative loons a taste of their own medicine by getting the Bible banned ought to have been the primary clapback to that ****show.
Recommended Posts