Jump to content

Update - Cornel West launching multi-3rd party POTUS run, seeking Green Party nom


Communion

Recommended Posts

  • ATRL Moderator

Huh, interesting. I like Cornel West a lot so I’m curious to see how he runs his campaign. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would’ve preferred him challenging Biden in the Democratic primary. I just don’t think we can realistically elect a People’s Party candidate when they can’t even make the debate stage. I’d vote for Cornel West over Biden in a general election since I live in a red state. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • ATRL Moderator
5 minutes ago, GraceRandolph said:

I would’ve preferred him challenging Biden in the Democratic primary. I just don’t think we can realistically elect a People’s Party candidate when they can’t even make the debate stage. I’d vote for Cornel West over Biden in a general election since I live in a red state. 

Yeah I kinda agree. There’s value in 3rd parties of course. But they’re heavily stifled by the way voting is done in the US. If we had ranked choice voting, they’d be much more viable. It would be cool to see West challenge Biden in a primary. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

until a 3rd party actually gains traction, this will only take away dem votes and make it easier for reps to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 50thStateofMind said:

this will only take away dem votes

Guess Joe's gonna have to put some work in for them votes now. :celestial5:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Communion said:

Guess Joe's gonna have to put some work in for them votes now. :celestial5:

wish he'd just drop out and endorse someone we actually want :rip: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly seems like a better option than Biden :cm:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like him better than any of the candidates running, but even without him running for the joke that is the People's Party, he's the longest shot of any of them. Well... maybe except for Marianne.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’d love to see him win, but socialist as a term completely eliminates him from having a chance unfortunately, gringos see that word and they FLIP OUT :deadbanana4:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a genuinely stupid decision.

 

If it was beneath Bernie, it's beneath you, Cornel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • ATRL Moderator

#ImWithHim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • ATRL Administrator

Win a mayorship, county executive, state legislature, state senate or governorship first so people can point to your slate of accomplishments so they don’t fear the “socialist” label before running for office with no record. Yikes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Ryan said:

Win a mayorship, county executive, state legislature, state senate or governorship first so people can point to your slate of accomplishments so they don’t fear the “socialist” label before running for office with no record. Yikes. 

Question: Why is it that Joe Biden comes off as such a weak incumbent that even longshots with zero hope like Marianne Williamson and Cornel West can see blood in the water?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • ATRL Administrator
10 minutes ago, ClashAndBurn said:

Question: Why is it that Joe Biden comes off as such a weak incumbent that even longshots with zero hope like Marianne Williamson and Cornel West can see blood in the water?

Question: Why is it that you people seem hellbent on supporting candidates with no record of success or failure, with no experience in government on any level, and think they can win a national campaign when they can’t even win local/county/state elections?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Ryan said:

Question: Why is it that you people seem hellbent on supporting candidates with no record of success or failure, with no experience in government on any level, and think they can win a national campaign when they can’t even win local/county/state elections?

Genuinely, I've never said I support either Williamson or West running their doomed campaigns. If anything, it gives Biden and the Democrats an excuse to point to if they don't win, rather than owning up to their failures (which as the reaction to 2016 showed us, they never will anyway).

 

Biden should be allowed to fail on his own merits. Which, given how weak he is, he has an exceedingly high likelihood of doing so.

Edited by ClashAndBurn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • ATRL Administrator
2 minutes ago, ClashAndBurn said:

Genuinely, I've never said I support either Williamson or West running their doomed campaigns. If anything, it gives Biden and the Democrats an excuse to point to if they don't win, rather than owning up to their failures (which as the reaction to 2016 showed us, they never will anyway).

 

Biden should be allowed to fail on his own merits. Which, given how weak he is, he will.

Yes. Oh weak Biden. He should step aside so someone stronger can win. Hopefully it’s someone who inspires people! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ryan said:

Yes. Oh weak Biden. He should step aside so someone stronger can win. Hopefully it’s someone who inspires people! 

I don't think he should necessarily step aside. The reality is, the entire rest of the Democratic Party's bench is even weaker and even more grotesquely unpopular. Kamala Harris? Dead woman walking (politically of course!) when she's inevitably coronated in 2028. :lmao: 

 

The Democratic Party just needs to accept what cards they've dealt us: an empty husk of a man that can't walk, can't speak, and can't work longer than 6 hours a day before calling a lid on contact with the press at 4PM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • ATRL Administrator
9 minutes ago, ClashAndBurn said:

I don't think he should necessarily step aside. The reality is, the entire rest of the Democratic Party's bench is even weaker and even more grotesquely unpopular. Kamala Harris? Dead woman walking (politically of course!) when she's inevitably coronated in 2028. :lmao: 

 

The Democratic Party just needs to accept what cards they've dealt us: an empty husk of a man that can't walk, can't speak, and can't work longer than 6 hours a day before calling a lid on contact with the press at 4PM.

I don’t think anyone under the age of 40 is genuinely excited for Biden. We know the reality we’re facing and no one on the left wants a repeat of the Trump Administration. Biden isn’t the one people want, but he’s the only option that legitimately stands a shot at thwarting Trump (who will win the nomination). 
 

I can’t afford to be idealistic. The reality is someone actively trying to make our lives miserable versus someone who isn’t great but isn’t the most terrible either. It’s a pragmatic approach. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Ryan said:

I don’t think anyone under the age of 40 is genuinely excited for Biden. We know the reality we’re facing and no one on the left wants a repeat of the Trump Administration. Biden isn’t the one people want, but he’s the only option that legitimately stands a shot at thwarting Trump (who will win the nomination). 
 

I can’t afford to be idealistic. The reality is someone actively trying to make our lives miserable versus someone who isn’t great but isn’t the most terrible either. It’s a pragmatic approach. 

Pragmatism is fine. Biden is the only pragmatic and realistic choice for all the reasons I mentioned. But "not being Trump" wasn't enough for Hillary in an election that wasn't marred by COVID. And with things deteriorating economically as inflation refuses to cool down and the Fed continues to raise interest rates in response, putting us in danger of a recession... It's hard not to see a potential repeat of 2016 where cultural resentment won the day.

 

What's going to happen when Biden can't run for president anymore anyway? The Republicans won't stop being a fascist disaster, and the Democrats won't have anyone electable lined up. They have no stars. No bench. They arguably didn't in 2020 either, with Biden literally having to be called out of retirement. Four more years of... this isn't going to save us. Especially when Kamala's up against DeSantis or whomever else in '28.

 

In fact, the current state of stagnation probably leads to more Senate seats being permanently lost with Republicans being relatively close to a filibuster-proof majority.

Edited by ClashAndBurn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Ryan said:

with no experience in government on any level

Come on. This is unnecessarily insulting to Dr. West's literal decades of activism. :toofunny3: 

The apparatus of politics exists far beyond electoralism and being an elected official.

 

Literally at every point in history Biden found himself on the wrong side of said history, Cornel West would have found himself on the right side of history.

 

One cannot berate and scold people into voting for a Democrat. That's objectively why Hillary lost.

 

Why do Democrats want to lose so badly that they're only running on a campaign appealing to right-wingers?

Why doesn't Biden easily adopt a popular policy like M4A if Dems are worried about progressive defecting?

Edited by Communion
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not this Obama-ossessed racist :rip:

Edited by WBTlove
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No thanks. My vote is reserved for the ultimate choice :bird:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cornel is welcome to do what he wants. It's a democracy. I do hope that his campaign can help move Biden left in some way along with Marianne and I prefer progressives to do something as opposed to what Bernie, AOC, Liz Warren etc seem to be doing right now.

 

But progressives that actually do vote for him in swing states in Nov 2024, rather than merely threatening to do so, would be making a tremendous mistake. That much is obvious. Trump/Desantis are not worth a quick lil W against corporate dems.

 

I hope that people play it right and ultimately choose to use their votes strategically instead of basing it on emotion. That's how we should view voting, as one part of a strategy to move things leftward - not this absurd moral thing where we can only vote for candidates that completely align with our views. Hell that's certainly how I vote in my country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Harrier said:

I hope that people play it right and ultimately choose to use their votes strategically 

What's not strategic about voting for a person who says they support M4A while both Democrats and Republicans refuse to support M4A?

 

How do you teach a politician that M4A is a necessary policy if they don't have to fear ever losing your vote for not supporting it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.