Aren Posted Friday at 12:24 AM Share Posted Friday at 12:24 AM Would you be here for it? Would you love it or think it’s underwhelming? I can definitely see her going for this sound in her next album, especially since Burns is rumored to be the main producer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MotoPapi Posted Friday at 12:38 AM Share Posted Friday at 12:38 AM Gaga is too cringe and over the top. She cannot do subtle slay like Kylie. 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckythisway Posted Friday at 12:45 AM Share Posted Friday at 12:45 AM Ppl would be calling it basic trash bc this site has a double standard for Gaga -1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joyride Posted Friday at 12:48 AM Share Posted Friday at 12:48 AM it would sound terrible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HASHTAGPOW Posted Friday at 12:50 AM Share Posted Friday at 12:50 AM Gaga can't do sexy 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZIVERT Posted Friday at 12:51 AM Share Posted Friday at 12:51 AM (edited) It would suck because she would put her musical theatre ass vocals on it Edited Friday at 02:09 AM by ZIVERT 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rotunda Posted Friday at 12:54 AM Share Posted Friday at 12:54 AM It doesn’t really fit her voice. She’d probably make it into an opera moment. 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bliaz Posted Friday at 01:43 AM Share Posted Friday at 01:43 AM Different artists, voices and personalities... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kimberly Posted Friday at 01:49 AM Share Posted Friday at 01:49 AM I don't even like Kylie's version, so no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmailMySwift Posted Friday at 01:51 AM Share Posted Friday at 01:51 AM It's a cringeworthy song now and it would be a cringeworthy song with Gaga too Padam, padam I know you wanna take me home Padam And take off all my clothes Plzzzzzzz -1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkgalord Posted Friday at 02:01 AM Share Posted Friday at 02:01 AM It doesn't fit Gaga's style, let's be real. -1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truthteller Posted Friday at 02:06 AM Share Posted Friday at 02:06 AM she would scream and belt all over the track like she did with perfect illusion so no 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptolemaea Posted Friday at 02:09 AM Share Posted Friday at 02:09 AM her voice isn’t pretty enough for that song. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnigmaticAndroid Posted Friday at 02:09 AM Share Posted Friday at 02:09 AM It'd be called dated and generic garbage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptolemaea Posted Friday at 02:10 AM Share Posted Friday at 02:10 AM 1 hour ago, ZIVERT said: It would suck because she would put her mucosal theatre ass vocals on it not mucosal djdb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
littlebodybigheart Posted Friday at 02:13 AM Share Posted Friday at 02:13 AM like everybody already said, her voice doesn’t fit that song Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TouchinFree Posted Friday at 02:27 AM Share Posted Friday at 02:27 AM 20 minutes ago, truthteller said: she would scream and belt all over the track like she did with perfect illusion so no Just remembered that song. God it was awful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GraceRandolph Posted Friday at 02:36 AM Share Posted Friday at 02:36 AM (edited) 1 hour ago, ZIVERT said: It would suck because she would put her musical theatre ass vocals on it Only on ATRL are musical theatre vocals a drag. Gaga would slay a song like that. Edited Friday at 02:36 AM by GraceRandolph -3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ultraviolence.xx Posted Friday at 02:41 AM Share Posted Friday at 02:41 AM 1 hour ago, ZIVERT said: It would suck because she would put her musical theatre ass vocals on it exactly (also howling at mucosal clckelsbekenej) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brooklyndaddy Posted Friday at 02:46 AM Share Posted Friday at 02:46 AM Would still be a bad song and a new low for Gaga Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GraceRandolph Posted Friday at 02:46 AM Share Posted Friday at 02:46 AM 5 minutes ago, ultraviolence.xx said: exactly (also howling at mucosal clckelsbekenej) Lady Gaga's low notes are well supported, and have a dark, solid and medium weight to them [Scheiße]. The mid-range is as chameleonesque as Gaga herself. It can be controlled, measured and mature [Fashion]; theatrical, poised and smooth [Lady Is A Tramp]; guttural, raw and raspy [ Dope]; or made perfect for pop music with the character stripped back, and a light, bright quality used [Poker Face]. All this vocal variety stems from Gaga's excellent understanding of placement and technique. The lower part of the belting range has a weight and thick timbre to it, as well as a strong resonance- thanks in large part to the superb support she provides it [Hair (Live)]. This resonance can be carried into the higher parts of the chest register- past a C5- but it creates a sound that is raspier and raw, as the placement is pulled into the throat [Edge of Glory (live)]. It's a technique she understands and uses with musical astuteness, adding texture and artistic colouring to a song or performance [Manicure]. This "edge" can be eliminated, at the expense of the resonance of the voice, by shifting the mix of the chest and head voice. The resulting sound produced is clearer and brighter with a healthier sound and an elastic quality[ background vocals: Sexxx Dreams]. The head voice alone can be light and airy [Paparazzi] or thicker and with an operatic like tone [ Government Hooker]. Despite not utilising this part of the range often in her pop output, Gaga has shown extreme comfort and skill, being able to sing within it without issue and in a connected fashion with the rest of her range [Sound Of Music medley]. Lady Gaga is in possession of an impressive vibrato which she uses to polish and adorn, mostly, her held notes. It is malleable and varied in nature, but can be used throughout the range [Chest] [Head ]. She is also capable of singing a note without it if need be [Bang Bang]. -6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ultraviolence.xx Posted Friday at 02:52 AM Share Posted Friday at 02:52 AM 4 minutes ago, GraceRandolph said: Lady Gaga's low notes are well supported, and have a dark, solid and medium weight to them [Scheiße]. The mid-range is as chameleonesque as Gaga herself. It can be controlled, measured and mature [Fashion]; theatrical, poised and smooth [Lady Is A Tramp]; guttural, raw and raspy [ Dope]; or made perfect for pop music with the character stripped back, and a light, bright quality used [Poker Face]. All this vocal variety stems from Gaga's excellent understanding of placement and technique. The lower part of the belting range has a weight and thick timbre to it, as well as a strong resonance- thanks in large part to the superb support she provides it [Hair (Live)]. This resonance can be carried into the higher parts of the chest register- past a C5- but it creates a sound that is raspier and raw, as the placement is pulled into the throat [Edge of Glory (live)]. It's a technique she understands and uses with musical astuteness, adding texture and artistic colouring to a song or performance [Manicure]. This "edge" can be eliminated, at the expense of the resonance of the voice, by shifting the mix of the chest and head voice. The resulting sound produced is clearer and brighter with a healthier sound and an elastic quality[ background vocals: Sexxx Dreams]. The head voice alone can be light and airy [Paparazzi] or thicker and with an operatic like tone [ Government Hooker]. Despite not utilising this part of the range often in her pop output, Gaga has shown extreme comfort and skill, being able to sing within it without issue and in a connected fashion with the rest of her range [Sound Of Music medley]. Lady Gaga is in possession of an impressive vibrato which she uses to polish and adorn, mostly, her held notes. It is malleable and varied in nature, but can be used throughout the range [Chest] [Head ]. She is also capable of singing a note without it if need be [Bang Bang]. what is your point? nothing in this giant fan-written wet dream is suitable for Padam Padam. you said it yourself: 5 minutes ago, GraceRandolph said: theatrical, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GraceRandolph Posted Friday at 02:55 AM Share Posted Friday at 02:55 AM 1 minute ago, ultraviolence.xx said: what is your point? nothing in this giant fan-written wet dream is suitable for Padam Padam. you said it yourself: That’s the writing of a vocal analyst on diva devotee. How is Padam Padam not a theatrical song? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Bad Wolf Posted Friday at 03:11 AM Share Posted Friday at 03:11 AM Thankfully, Gaga would never Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ultraviolence.xx Posted Friday at 04:10 AM Share Posted Friday at 04:10 AM 1 hour ago, GraceRandolph said: How is Padam Padam not a theatrical song? vocally it's not. kylie's delivery is very sex-kitten which gaga is not capable of doing. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts