discussion Do you believe in "Mercury Retrogade"?

[Victon]

11 hours ago, GentleDance said:

Everything that is not supported by science can only be belief/religion, using algorithms and math doesn't make it more scientific, maths are only a tool, even flat earthers use maths to justify their theories..

dude, but astrology is a blend of art and science. It studies the planet and the changing of season. Knowledge =/= beliefs 

 

6 hours ago, Tropez said:

This has no scientific backing. It’s all a pseudoscience. Can you actually prove this with data and following the scientific method? 

Well it won’t be 1+1=2 if you’re looking for exact thing in order to believe in something, but you can give it a try it won’t hurt nobody 
 

 

[Tropez]

32 minutes ago, Victon said:

dude, but astrology is a blend of art and science. It studies the planet and the changing of season. Knowledge =/= beliefs 

 

Well it won’t be 1+1=2 if you’re looking for exact thing in order to believe in something, but you can give it a try it won’t hurt nobody 
 

 

No. I am asking you. Please provide solid scientific evidence that it’s real. Provide reputable research that supports astrology. Please show me some valid sources. I would like to view the data. 

[305]

2 minutes ago, Tropez said:

No. I am asking you. Please provide solid scientific evidence that it’s real. Provide reputable research that makes astrology. Please show me some valid sources. I would like to view the data. 

The answer is no, they can't.

[GentleDance]

2 minutes ago, Victon said:

dude, but astrology is a blend of art and science. It studies the planet and the changing of season. Knowledge =/= beliefs 

 

Astrology has been rejected by the scientific community as having no explanatory power for describing the universe. Scientific testing has found no evidence to support the premises or purported effects outlined in astrological traditions.

Where astrology has made falsifiable predictions, it has been falsified.

Also if a theory is not falsifiable, it's not scientific.

 

Astrology has not demonstrated its effectiveness in controlled studies and has no scientific validity, and is thus regarded as pseudoscience. There is no proposed mechanism of action by which the positions and motions of stars and planets could affect people and events on Earth in the way astrologers say they do that does not contradict well-understood, basic aspects of biology and physics.

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrology_and_science

 

You can only believe/have faith in astrology, because the evidence against it is overwhelming.

[Victon]

2 hours ago, Tropez said:

No. I am asking you. Please provide solid scientific evidence that it’s real. Provide reputable research that supports astrology. Please show me some valid sources. I would like to view the data. 

 

2 hours ago, 305 said:

The answer is no, they can't.

 

2 hours ago, GentleDance said:

 

Astrology has been rejected by the scientific community as having no explanatory power for describing the universe. Scientific testing has found no evidence to support the premises or purported effects outlined in astrological traditions.

Where astrology has made falsifiable predictions, it has been falsified.

Also if a theory is not falsifiable, it's not scientific.

 

Astrology has not demonstrated its effectiveness in controlled studies and has no scientific validity, and is thus regarded as pseudoscience. There is no proposed mechanism of action by which the positions and motions of stars and planets could affect people and events on Earth in the way astrologers say they do that does not contradict well-understood, basic aspects of biology and physics.

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrology_and_science

 

You can only believe/have faith in astrology, because the evidence against it is overwhelming.

There’s google, I won’t waste my energy to explain it here

 

http://www.linda-goodman.com/cgi-bin/ubb/Ultimate.cgi

 

Try this web and have an open mind to see the perspective

[GentleDance]

5 minutes ago, Victon said:

 

 

There’s google, I won’t waste my energy to explain it here

 

http://www.linda-goodman.com/cgi-bin/ubb/Ultimate.cgi

 

Try this web and have an open mind to see the perspective

 

Well this a link to a whole ass forum, not sure what I'm supposed to see here.

 

Also, according to google:

Study shows people who believe in astrology tend to be less intelligent and more narcissistic

https://phys.org/news/2021-11-people-astrology-tend-intelligent-narcissistic.html

 

 

 

 

[305]

30 minutes ago, Victon said:

 

 

There’s google, I won’t waste my energy to explain it here

 

http://www.linda-goodman.com/cgi-bin/ubb/Ultimate.cgi

 

Try this web and have an open mind to see the perspective

[Victon]

10 hours ago, GentleDance said:

 

Well this a link to a whole ass forum, not sure what I'm supposed to see here.

 

Also, according to google:

Study shows people who believe in astrology tend to be less intelligent and more narcissistic

https://phys.org/news/2021-11-people-astrology-tend-intelligent-narcissistic.html

 

 

 

 

I am not triggered, study can always find some faults in everything no matter how significant it is. 
 

no one is chocking this knowledge down on anyone’s throat, since it can’t be proven with data and stuff but astrologers analyze the planets and stars position during someone’s birth date to give some insight about that person’s potential, their personality, talents, fears and where they could shine in terms of social life even some possible trauma etc.

 

it’s a perspective and you are either attracted or repulsed by the idea