music news Grimes endorses AI songs and “killing copyright”

[Nefertiti0]

 

 

[May]

i think 99% of what grimes does nowadays is cringe but i think this is cool of her

[Moloko Plus]

Genuinely one of her worst takes ever

Edited April 24, 2023 by Moloko Plus

[Rev8]

She is asking for credit, so it's still supporting the artist I guess

 

but it will push for AI to be more accepted and people to maybe lose creativity..however lots of ppl have also been complaining that there is nothing good or original these days, so..

[Big Bad Wolf]

Idk, she’s such a loser. The amount of times this girl has supported white supremacy, Nazi, communism beliefs, and still has stans….but if this was a pop girl of color she’d be relentlessly scalped in every thread. It’s not sitting right with me. I need WhiteATRL users to do better and hold their people accountable. Saying she’s a’ “internet troll UwU” is no longer a good enough excuse for this foolery. 

[ScorpiosGroove]

 

go make your own music you lazy broad… i’ve waited so long i don’t even like her anymore 

[Trent W]

If AI will do the whole music, why doesn’t she just press play to the AI instead of asking someone else to do so.

 

AI is not a collab with a human, is a machine doing the whole thing  

 

No one else can take the other 50% of that since a machine did it

 

She wanted to look cool but has no idea of what she’s talking about  x100

 

[illia]

5 minutes ago, Big Bad Wolf said:

Idk, she’s such a loser. The amount of times this girl has supported white supremacy, Nazi, communism beliefs, and still has stans….but if this was a pop girl of color she’d be relentlessly scalped in every thread. It’s not sitting right with me. I need WhiteATRL users to do better and hold their people accountable. Saying she’s a’ “internet troll UwU” is no longer a good enough excuse for this foolery. 

You're right and you should say it!

[Reginald]

2 minutes ago, ScorpiosGroove said:

 

go make your own music you lazy broad… i’ve waited so long i don’t even like her anymore 

[Helios]

Wait so she is OUT of her major record label contract? I was hoping for at least one high budget era. 

 

 

She was serving with Shinigami Eyes. How tf did we get LESS music than when she was independent?  

 

Anyway, this sounds like its gonna be a shi*s***. She's effectively opening up herself to be a meme forever. She is an amazing artist but my goodness she makes some dumb decisions.

[Tasty]

7 minutes ago, Big Bad Wolf said:

this girl has supported white supremacy, Nazi

when?

[Mornings]

This is kind of cool. But putting parameters on things isn't going to work for long. Also real artist literally can't stop creating art. Its compulsive. The only people these AI songs are going to cause problems for are the ones relying on the art to sustain grotesque wealth.

[RoseGold]

I mean that's a nicer way to go about it, I guess. You could just copy strike every AI that uses your voice but you can't take it down on every platform and it might embolden people to make more songs.

 

What Grumes suggests allows both the AI creator and singer gets a check, but if I were an artist I'd still feel taken advantage of. 

Edited April 24, 2023 by RoseGold

[Pendulum]

SHUT UP CLAIRE NOBODY CARES 

 

We're so sick of her pseudo-intellectual crap 

[samsclubPRESENTSavam]

grimes had a nice run those first few albums but her voice was never the kind of vocals I was dying to hear covering something the way musicians with more technical skills peak my interest. grimes was always about the aesthetic and the production going on in the songs. 

[Big Bad Wolf]

15 minutes ago, Tasty said:

when?

A thread was post just last week of her following and or liking Nazi content.

[Trent W]

35 minutes ago, RoseGold said:

I mean that's a nicer way to go about it, I guess. You could just copy strike every AI that uses your voice but you can't take it down on every platform and it might embolden people to make more songs.

 

What Grumes suggests allows both the AI creator and singer gets a check, but if I were an artist I'd still feel taken advantage of. 

There is no AI creator, no one should be able to profit from putting parameters in a machine.

 

No one who uses and AI to do art is an artist.

 

If it’s an actual producer then yes, but that has already existed for ages, dj’s have been able to mix songs online for decades and get deals with the voice of the artist.

 

 

 

 

Edited April 24, 2023 by Trent W

[TYMPS]

I like how it's a definite no towards any AI song referenceing s*xual violence, but she might give a pass to a Nazi Anthem.......if it's in jest 

 

ENOUGH from this brittle bone irrelevant m*th head 

[Sombre]

A 50% cut of royalties just cause you used her AI vocals in a song is kinda crazy, considering she would have zero input into creating the song. 

Edited April 24, 2023 by Sombre

[politeone]

53 minutes ago, RoseGold said:

I mean that's a nicer way to go about it, I guess. You could just copy strike every AI that uses your voice but you can't take it down on every platform and it might embolden people to make more songs.

 

What Grumes suggests allows both the AI creator and singer gets a check, but if I were an artist I'd still feel taken advantage of. 

How if you're basically getting a free check. Think of it as the machine became 'inspired.' 

we can practically make it clear that it is AI somehow, so the public is aware

[M.R.]

56 minutes ago, Pendulum said:

SHUT UP CLAIRE NOBODY CARES 

 

We're so sick of her pseudo-intellectual crap 

Well said! 

[Alex]

azealia got her tea years before we did 

[fauxtography]

God can she just retire and leave all public spaces? One of the most insufferable artists.

 

How you gunna try and appeal to nerdy incels with "killing copyright" but then say you'd split royalties if someone used your voice in a song. Or else what Claire? You're going to copyright strike them?

[jadeabove]

49 minutes ago, Trent W said:

There is no AI creator, no one should be able to profit from putting parameters in a machine.

 

No one who uses and AI to do art is an artist.

 

If it’s an actual producer then yes, but that has already existed for ages, dj’s have been able to mix songs online for decades and get deals with the voice of the artist.

 

 

 

 

Also, out of all the singers in the world, no shade to Grimes, but why in the hell would I use her vocals instead of Ariana Grande for example or a much more qualified singer?

 

I think if this starts being a thing, interest towards emergent artists will die...

[Trent W]

46 minutes ago, jadeabove said:

Also, out of all the singers in the world, no shade to Grimes, but why in the hell would I use her vocals instead of Ariana Grande for example or a much more qualified singer?

 

I think if this starts being a thing, interest towards emergent artists will die...

This is the part that worries me the most.

 

Like sure at first a lot of mainstream artists will be  used in tracks, it will get oversaturated at some point too tho

 

But how the hell will a new artist rise and build a base if the average joe is able to do a track with a mainstream artist’s voice in an AI machine?