ATRL Moderator Ampersand13 Posted April 18, 2023 ATRL Moderator Posted April 18, 2023 A legend with RANGE We stan
stoopidjenna Posted April 18, 2023 Posted April 18, 2023 The range she showed from 2004-2005 was astounding: -Mean Girls (villain in a teen comedy) -The Notebook (female lead in a romantic drama) -Wedding Crashers (main love interest in a rom-com) -Red Eye (lead in a contained thriller) -The Family Stone (ensemble in a dramedy) Im glad she did what she needed to do for her own sanity, but imagine if she had taken one or two of those roles in 2006
Taylor fanboy Posted April 18, 2023 Posted April 18, 2023 (edited) Someone should do a crossover of Morning Glory and Devil Wears Prada, where Rachel is now the Head of the News Division, and Anne is now a news anchor. Edited April 18, 2023 by Taylor fanboy
Taylor fanboy Posted April 18, 2023 Posted April 18, 2023 I just lover her so much! If anything, her PR team and/or agency has failed her bigtime. She was supposed to be a SUPERSTAR.
JustHoran Posted April 18, 2023 Posted April 18, 2023 13 minutes ago, GraceRandolph said: Am I the only one who finds her boring? Yes, you are the only one and no one asked.
JustHoran Posted April 18, 2023 Posted April 18, 2023 What a queen She deserves to be even bigger than she is, but she has so many iconic roles and is so respected. I'm glad it was her choice and she lives a nice peaceful life.
madonnafan18 Posted April 18, 2023 Posted April 18, 2023 I really love this interview and photoshoot!
Bethenny Frankel Posted April 18, 2023 Posted April 18, 2023 She was OUTSTANDING in Spotlight, I highly recommend you watch that movie if you haven't already.
Crank_It_Up Posted April 19, 2023 Posted April 19, 2023 4 hours ago, Taylor fanboy said: I just lover her so much! If anything, her PR team and/or agency has failed her bigtime. She was supposed to be a SUPERSTAR. I don’t see how they failed her since it’s clear that a life separate from the celebrity world was what Rachel wanted. If Rachel wanted to be a gigantic superstar, I’m pretty sure her team would’ve made it happen. But that wasn’t what she wanted. Either way, Rachel stays winning because everyone WILL remember her for the majority of her films. Almost every role she’s taken all have been iconic.
fridayteenage Posted April 19, 2023 Posted April 19, 2023 5 hours ago, Shelter said: She was offered The Devil Wears Prada 3 times. Would've been perfect for her. Regina george vs miranda priestly oh wow
Dior Posted April 19, 2023 Posted April 19, 2023 She should’ve done devil wears Prada that movie and mean girls I can watch over and over again and not get bored
midnightdawn Posted April 19, 2023 Posted April 19, 2023 Turning down The Devil Wears Prada opposite Meryl was a mistake. Especially since she been in so many duds since. When you're at the height of your career getting the very best roles around you should take them while you can.
Bey'Knight Posted April 19, 2023 Posted April 19, 2023 14 hours ago, RockStarShit101 said: I assume it was anne's role, right? My poor fav, she wasn’t even second choice but she slayed anyway and that’s what history’ll remember.
Bey'Knight Posted April 19, 2023 Posted April 19, 2023 12 hours ago, Taylor fanboy said: I just lover her so much! If anything, her PR team and/or agency has failed her bigtime. She was supposed to be a SUPERSTAR. How are you missing the point? She didn’t want to be a SUPERSTAR. Not everyone clamours for overzealous fan mania like Taylor.
Taylor fanboy Posted April 19, 2023 Posted April 19, 2023 7 hours ago, Crank_It_Up said: I don’t see how they failed her since it’s clear that a life separate from the celebrity world was what Rachel wanted. If Rachel wanted to be a gigantic superstar, I’m pretty sure her team would’ve made it happen. But that wasn’t what she wanted. Either way, Rachel stays winning because everyone WILL remember her for the majority of her films. Almost every role she’s taken all have been iconic. 2 minutes ago, Bey'Knight said: How are you missing the point? She didn’t want to be a SUPERSTAR. Not everyone clamours for overzealous fan mania like Taylor. You can be a SUPERSTAR even without overworking yourself. See Beyoncé for example.
Mr. Duff Posted April 19, 2023 Posted April 19, 2023 23 minutes ago, Taylor fanboy said: You can be a SUPERSTAR even without overworking yourself. See Beyoncé for example. But that’s not what she wanted. I adore Rachel so much and I have always loved her films and her acting. She’s superb, and I agree with pne comment here, her performance in Spotlight was one of the best I’ve seen from her. She’s also very beautiful and she’s not aging!
Khal Posted April 19, 2023 Posted April 19, 2023 12 hours ago, Taylor fanboy said: I just lover her so much! If anything, her PR team and/or agency has failed her bigtime. She was supposed to be a SUPERSTAR. How?? She literally just admitted in the interview that she was the one turning down big roles, meaning if she wanted to be bigger, she could have
liquiddiamonds Posted April 19, 2023 Posted April 19, 2023 (edited) She says she’s super fine and living a great life and people here saying she failed and made mistakes…… lol this woman already booked classics, an oscar nom and has built her name. she very clearly wanted more privacy and she aint alone. if you check Anne H. and other talented ladies from their era (Emily Blunt, Natalie Portman, Keira Knightley, Emma Stone) they all had this in common! It was tough being uber-famous in the 2000s and they said nope (while somehow still booking franchises and acclaimed movies, some bombs too lol) Edited April 19, 2023 by liquiddiamonds
Bey'Knight Posted April 19, 2023 Posted April 19, 2023 7 hours ago, Taylor fanboy said: You can be a SUPERSTAR even without overworking yourself. See Beyoncé for example. Beyoncé can only pull off her current approach because of the legwork she’d done in the noughties.
perfillusion Posted April 19, 2023 Posted April 19, 2023 I mean, The Devil Wears Prada is an iconic classic but it was based on a panned book. At the time maybe she couldn't have known it would be what it became. Definitely a mistake but you have to look at it from her pov back then.
Recommended Posts