news Gay Judge fired for Onlyfans

[Kiel D-01]

Well he’s living his life at least.

[PoisonPill]

2 hours ago, The7thStranger said:

Again, I agree with that he's not fit to be a judge based on at least points one and two (three would depend on whether or not he has been clinically diagnosed as a sex addict by a qualified professional). But you're avoiding my actual question.

 

There is a lot of hollering in this thread that doing sex work intrinsically and unquestionably means no longer being capable of fulfilling the role of a judge. Why? I've yet to see anybody really tackle this argument other than "ew gross pee."

Then I would direct that question to someone who is arguing that doing porn automatically disqualifies someone from being a judge, which I'm not. 

[BrokenMachine]

Well, he can do whatever he wants and there's no reason to s*** shame him as some are doing in here, like, this is ATRL, we know you do the same, the only difference is you don't record it nor get paid for it 

 

Having said that, even if most of the stuff he did is not merely wrong, it's still 'wrong' from a social/moral point of view and I don't get why he would consciously put himself into a situation like that. In school we're always told that as professionals we have to keep our personal lives private as much as we can, and those like teachers, judges, politics and all of them should be way more careful than anyone, because society is way too judgemental... And then there him goes throwing his career away just for a few years of NSFW content 

Edited March 28, 2023 by BrokenMachine

[The7thStranger]

1 hour ago, PoisonPill said:

Then I would direct that question to someone who is arguing that doing porn automatically disqualifies someone from being a judge, which I'm not. 

  

On 3/27/2023 at 12:49 AM, PoisonPill said:

When it comes to a taxpayer-funded judge who has the power to make binding rulings, yes someone's poor judgment and unprofessional choices in his "private life" (which is inaccurate because he publishes his sex acts for the world and earns money from them) does impact his judgeship and the validity of his rulings.

[Chris]

SOME of the replies in here.

 

 

4 hours ago, Mitsouko said:

I hope y'all find yourself in court one day as a defendant and you find out your judge is guzzling the prosecuting attorney's orange piss while court is adjourned and was playing with his caged genitalia while hearing your defense.

PLEASE stop. My cheeks are literally hurting.

 

[imabadkid]

4 hours ago, Mitsouko said:

I hope y'all find yourself in court one day as a defendant and you find out your judge is guzzling the prosecuting attorney's orange piss while court is adjourned and was playing with his caged genitalia while hearing your defense.

I was at the gas station in line when I read this and the people just looked at me because I was cackling

[Guest]

I've talked with him on G countless times  I'm so done

[Katamari]

6 hours ago, BionicWooHoo said:

I can’t wait for the eventual onlyfans post:

 

Sorry for the lack of posts lately everyone. I’ve been severely depressed ever since the NYPost article came out but I promise to make it up to you guys. For a limited time only, you can purchase this vid of me getting fisted, pissed on, and bukkaked while I wear my judge’s robe for 50% off. If you like this post within the next 48 hours, I will also DM you a vid of my prolapsed hole leaking out 21 loads. 

thread is a mess. no wonder its almost hitting 20 pages

[Katamari]

4 hours ago, Mitsouko said:

I hope y'all find yourself in court one day as a defendant and you find out your judge is guzzling the prosecuting attorney's orange piss while court is adjourned and was playing with his caged genitalia while hearing your defense.

 

[Bloo]

5 hours ago, Bears01 said:

Having consensual sex with strangers is totally fine, it’s just you can’t act surprised that he’s at a job where you have to have the utmost professional of appearances (which a judge absolutely is), and then gets fired  like come on. He’s not a waiter at a fancy restaurant, he’s a government employee 

But that shouldn't matter, though. That has nothing to do with the fact that, yes, we do live in a sex-negative world. Nobody is saying it's surprising he lost his job because of it. To that extent, I fully agree with you that it's unsurprising.

 

I'm simply saying that response shouldn't happen in general. Nobody should care what you do in your sex life with consenting adults. It shouldn't matter if you post it online for consumption from other people because it doesn't affect your on-the-job decision-making skills. The fact that our culture views it as "dirty" and inappropriate isn't a neutral thing, it's a bad thing.

[bjorn]

35 minutes ago, Bloo said:

But that shouldn't matter, though. That has nothing to do with the fact that, yes, we do live in a sex-negative world. Nobody is saying it's surprising he lost his job because of it. To that extent, I fully agree with you that it's unsurprising.

 

I'm simply saying that response shouldn't happen in general. Nobody should care what you do in your sex life with consenting adults. It shouldn't matter if you post it online for consumption from other people because it doesn't affect your on-the-job decision-making skills. The fact that our culture views it as "dirty" and inappropriate isn't a neutral thing, it's a bad thing.

Well that’s the world we live in. You either play the game or you get played. 

[Bears01]

37 minutes ago, Bloo said:

But that shouldn't matter, though. That has nothing to do with the fact that, yes, we do live in a sex-negative world. Nobody is saying it's surprising he lost his job because of it. To that extent, I fully agree with you that it's unsurprising.

 

I'm simply saying that response shouldn't happen in general. Nobody should care what you do in your sex life with consenting adults. It shouldn't matter if you post it online for consumption from other people because it doesn't affect your on-the-job decision-making skills. The fact that our culture views it as "dirty" and inappropriate isn't a neutral thing, it's a bad thing.

I’m sorry sis I have to disagree with you. If I was a CEO or a boss in a prestigious profession, I wouldn’t want to see one of my employees getting railed for the world to see, or doing the railing, either or, gay or straight or whatever. 
 

When it comes to work, keep that private. Let your freak flag fly. Do whatever you want, but it comes to a setting where image is important, no. 

[Lady Claire]

Sex work is all good and makes sense for people who actually needs the cash, that's why many people go for it... but he's a ******* judge, that job doesn't pay him enough? Especially when we consider the fact that he knew it would get him in trouble

 

Seems like a case of a desperate need of validation, or sex addiction. A mess all around

[Bloo]

14 minutes ago, bjorn said:

Well that’s the world we live in. You either play the game or you get played. 

Again, has nothing to do with my point. No one is denying that, but it's still dumb and arbitrary, ultimately. Saying we are generally sex-negative isn't a compelling argument and it's so elementary it's not even interesting to share.

10 minutes ago, Bears01 said:

I’m sorry sis I have to disagree with you. If I was a CEO or a boss in a prestigious profession, I wouldn’t want to see one of my employees getting railed for the world to see, or doing the railing, either or, gay or straight or whatever. 
 

When it comes to work, keep that private. Let your freak flag fly. Do whatever you want, but it comes to a setting where image is important, no. 

If you're the CEO, are you required to watch the content your employee produces when they're off-the-clock? No. If you think it makes the company look bad, then why should it? That's completely arbitrary and, again, comes from a place of sex-negativity. That's something that we all should try to move away from because logically it doesn't make sense to care about that at the end of the day. If they're doing it on-the-clock, then sure. Outside of that, there's no logical reason for it unless you lean into sex-negative sentiment.

[Josh]

6 hours ago, Melquiades said:

It's about time we gays start talking seriously about sex addiction. It isn't normal to have sex with hundred of different people a year. Then you wonder why so many gay men are sad, lonely and incapable of mantaining long term relationships. 

Clearly you never met those breeders who have swinger clubs 

[#Beautiful]

the people fighting for dear life over a narcissistic white gay who's so self absorbed that he would risk ruining his professional career and life over some temporary thrill that he gets from vain people who'll never look at him twice by the time he's 40 and with the source material in the op screaming "people in this thread shaming him for having sex with strangers!!!!111"  there's no way you're actually that oblivious please get out of the house and put these nasty apps down, talk to some real people in an environment that isn't a bar or a club and grow up

[Jude]

Oh, he's verse. Good for him.

[Bears01]

14 minutes ago, Bloo said:

Again, has nothing to do with my point. No one is denying that, but it's still dumb and arbitrary, ultimately. Saying we are generally sex-negative isn't a compelling argument and it's so elementary it's not even interesting to share.

If you're the CEO, are you required to watch the content your employee produces when they're off-the-clock? No. If you think it makes the company look bad, then why should it? That's completely arbitrary and, again, comes from a place of sex-negativity. That's something that we all should try to move away from because logically it doesn't make sense to care about that at the end of the day. If they're doing it on-the-clock, then sure. Outside of that, there's no logical reason for it unless you lean into sex-negative sentiment.

It’s not “sex negativity” to not ask your employees to be filmed having sex in public  which he did. He’s a FEDERAL judge. He openly talked about sucking a prosecutors d!ck on the job. That’s about as unprofessional as it gets 

[nadiamendell]

56 minutes ago, Bears01 said:

It’s not “sex negativity” to not ask your employees to be filmed having sex in public  which he did. He’s a FEDERAL judge. He openly talked about sucking a prosecutors d!ck on the job. That’s about as unprofessional as it gets 

You all clearly need to learn how to read. Key words were "off-the-clock". What someone does in their off-time, as long as it's LEGAL and doesn't HARM anyone else should not have any effect on their work lives. There was a time (and in many places this STILL happens) where simply being gay/having sex with someone of the same sex would also be judged the same way a bunch of you prudes are judging right now. 

 

Bloo is completely right here.  Keep your nose out of other people's sex lives. No one is FORCING you to watch their videos. 

Edited March 29, 2023 by nadiamendell

[terrorblade]

19 pages

[getfree2017]

4 hours ago, nadiamendell said:

You all clearly need to learn how to read. Key words were "off-the-clock". What someone does in their off-time, as long as it's LEGAL and doesn't HARM anyone else should not have any effect on their work lives. There was a time (and in many places this STILL happens) where simply being gay/having sex with someone of the same sex would also be judged the same way a bunch of you prudes are judging right now. 

 

Bloo is completely right here.  Keep your nose out of other people's sex lives. No one is FORCING you to watch their videos. 

Idiot

[Breathe On Moi]

2 hours ago, terrorblade said:

19 pages

the way I’m actually for once surprised by some people’s take on this 

[Bloo]

6 hours ago, Bears01 said:

It’s not “sex negativity” to not ask your employees to be filmed having sex in public  which he did. He’s a FEDERAL judge. He openly talked about sucking a prosecutors d!ck on the job. That’s about as unprofessional as it gets 

I’m talking about having an OnlyFans in general. Having sex in public is a crime and that’s a separate issue altogether. I’m not interested in that. It is 100% sex negativity to say that your boss should have any purview over what you do off the clock, even if it is consensual sex with adults at your or their place. 
 

If you say, “Well, it makes the company look bad,” then that’s literally because of sex negativity, which is my point. 
 

My comments were addressing the many in here that were criticizing him for simply having an OnlyFans. 

[bjorn]

5 hours ago, nadiamendell said:

You all clearly need to learn how to read. Key words were "off-the-clock". What someone does in their off-time, as long as it's LEGAL and doesn't HARM anyone else should not have any effect on their work lives. There was a time (and in many places this STILL happens) where simply being gay/having sex with someone of the same sex would also be judged the same way a bunch of you prudes are judging right now. 

 

Bloo is completely right here.  Keep your nose out of other people's sex lives. No one is FORCING you to watch their videos. 

Key word here is “should not”. But that isn’t the world we live in isn’t? 

[bjorn]

43 minutes ago, Bloo said:

I’m talking about having an OnlyFans in general. Having sex in public is a crime and that’s a separate issue altogether. I’m not interested in that. It is 100% sex negativity to say that your boss should have any purview over what you do off the clock, even if it is consensual sex with adults at your or their place. 
 

If you say, “Well, it makes the company look bad,” then that’s literally because of sex negativity, which is my point. 
 

My comments were addressing the many in here that were criticizing him for simply having an OnlyFans. 

Your point doesn’t matter in the real world. It doesn’t matter if you think or feel it’s sex negative. Anyone can have their opinion. What matter is the consequences in real life. At the end he got fired, and that’s a decision his boss made. 
 

Absolutely I agree with you that your employer shouldn’t care what you do off the clock. However he’s promoting himself on a public forum (Twitter), which then is putting his firm in a bad light. 

Edited March 29, 2023 by bjorn