Jump to content

Gay Judge fired for Onlyfans


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 537
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Headlock

    16

  • Chris

    15

  • bijonse

    14

  • bjorn

    14

getfree2017
Posted
14 hours ago, Tropez said:

Not true. Look at his twitter. The guys he hooks up with are all different races. 

He’ll let anyone enter him. 

Posted

I’m sorry, somebody who’s supposed to be at the top of their game in terms of professional appearances (which a Judge absolutely is) should not be doing live porn for the whole world to see :rip: he coulda at least disguised his identity 

Posted

His family and friends probably don't even care and still support him.

Posted

The worst kind of

Spoiler

judge

 

Posted
16 hours ago, ryoncé said:

newsflash, if you "drink urine by night" and promote it online, im going to judge you because its repulsive. That aint gonna change anytime soon.

 

you can support the gay community without having to support people who drink the remaining fluids in a condom, literally get some class and stop supporting the bottom of the barrel.... 

Exactly exactly but all these kids know in life is the millennial/gen z social media lie they were raised in, where passing judgement by strangers online is akin to a hate crime or human rights violation. :toofunny3: They don't live in the real world. We're allowed to think he's bad and stupid (because he is x)

Posted
1 hour ago, Milestone said:

putting your 6 figure job on the line just so you can be known as a ‘white-collar ****’ is just…insane. horny is truly a disease :rip:

 

he needed a reality check anyway, he thought he was untouchable. be careful what you wish for 

 

there’s no way they didn’t know he was doing this stuff, especially with 100k twitter followers:rip:

 

If my family member was doing public scat porn I’d be judging and distancing myself. Hell naw 

Posted

Judges make a TON of money, so why would you risk all of that for OF? :rip: Mess

 

I wonder if he has a sex addiction or something. Anyway..

Posted
2 hours ago, Bears01 said:

I’m sorry, somebody who’s supposed to be at the top of their game in terms of professional appearances (which a Judge absolutely is) should not be doing live porn for the whole world to see :rip: he coulda at least disguised his identity 

 

Posted
6 hours ago, #Beautiful said:

14 pages :ahh:

im shook

 

last i was in here it was barely 2 :bibliahh:

 

 

Posted

He's dumb but well, I'll guess he'll stick to the OF since he's fired.

Posted
3 hours ago, Milestone said:

putting your 6 figure job on the line just so you can be known as a ‘white-collar ****’ is just…insane. horny is truly a disease :rip:

 

he needed a reality check anyway, he thought he was untouchable. be careful what you wish for 

 

there’s no way they didn’t know he was doing this stuff, especially with 100k twitter followers:rip:

 

IS THAT BELLA GOTH IN YOUR AVI?

 

:jonny4:

Posted
3 hours ago, Milestone said:

putting your 6 figure job on the line just so you can be known as a ‘white-collar ****’ is just…insane. horny is truly a disease :rip:

 

he needed a reality check anyway, he thought he was untouchable. be careful what you wish for 

 

there’s no way they didn’t know he was doing this stuff, especially with 100k twitter followers:rip:

 

I doubt he was even making 6 figures... administrative law judges make like 70k at most, they mostly handle traffic tickets. 

Posted

Seeing some interesting opinions in here. I see both sides. Especially since his face is being blasted (:gaycat1:) across the internet doing unsightly things. But part of me feels that’s it’s his private life so :chick1: he can kind of do whatever he wants. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, brooklyndaddy said:

Seeing some interesting opinions in here. I see both sides. Especially since his face is being blasted (:gaycat1:) across the internet doing unsightly things. But part of me feels that’s it’s his private life so :chick1: he can kind of do whatever he wants. 

I think it stops being "private life" when you're earning income from the activity, publishing the content to the entire world, and breaking laws by having sex in public places.

Posted (edited)

I thought in public law, there are some ethical rules for judges. One is to uphold the law and your personal life be as ethical and moral as expected. 

 

He clearly broke the law on prostitution, public nudity exposure and many more. So, in reality as the law is currently, he knew better that he would be fired on the spot and the law allows it. 

 

Its that simple, its not **** shaming. Its simply the truth of he should have chosen one side hutsle, or careers that do not conflict. I think a medical doctor would have had more leeway or even a pilot as lonh as they did not perform the orgies and exposure on their jobs. The judge performed his on the job, where his conduct would always be traced, as being a judge is held to super high standard. He had it coming. 

 

I also think he has an addiction and his sexual expression has become destructive for his own good. A commonality in the community and a sign of internalized homophobia  unhealthy mental habits and other self esteem issues. 

Edited by L.B GAGA
Posted
On 3/26/2023 at 5:36 AM, Tasty said:

:bibliahh:

 

I mean nobody said it wouldn't make sense if it affected his job, just that maybe it shouldn't.

Why is the professional image line drawn at *****graphy if it doesn't harm anyone, is off the clock and on a different account?

Obviously I'm not talking about this specific case anymore since he did illegal ****, but I don't think having an Onlyfans makes you less professional at your job.

I don't want to ~sex shame~ or whatever, but ultimately yes there is a professional line that should be followed for plenty of occupations.

 

I know this is a specific (and made up) example, but would you be comfortable with your kid's teacher at school having an OnlyFans account? Everything is very accessible and easily found online, and I wouldn't like the idea of my kid being able to find their teacher online like that. I'm sure there are other professions where this might be a question too. 

 

In this judge's case, he did have tweets that were like "maybe I could squeeze in a quickie with a lawyer during jury duty." Even if this were said just as a joke, anyone could easily use it to question his impartiality in the courtroom. 

 

I don't have anything against OF at all, but I think people who want to be on OF with their faces or other identifying markers should go into it with the knowledge and acceptance that it won't necessarily be compatible with future careers. 

Posted

He was posting videos about jerking off on the clock, using his professional status as a draw to create sex content, having sex in public and some of y’all think he did nothing wrong :redface:

Posted

you play stupid games you win stupid prizes. 

Posted
6 hours ago, getfree2017 said:

He’ll let anyone enter him. 

Not Asians tho 

Posted (edited)

Read a few pages, and yikes...

 

Let's be clear. You can literally do any job and still do sex work as a side-hustle, and vice versa. It DOES NOT affect your competence or qualifications, are some of you being for ******* real? Like most of you conservative weirdos could not even articulate why it is "wrong" for him to be a judge and an OF model. Spoiler: because it isn't. You can get railed by a traffic cone or w/e and go to work next day and submit a thesis published in a journal, ZERO correlation. 

 

It also outs most of y'all as being almost delusionally out of touch because how many literal public figures - we're talking politicians - get caught up in some freaky **** on the regular? Do y'all think only certain professionals are kinky and wild in their personal lives, or? I hate to break it to y'all :deadbanana:

 

Now, whether he needs the income from sex work is a separate discussion, well, it is not really a discussion because it is none of my business. Nothing posted so far indicates he was doing it out of financial duress, and hell, he doesn't have to.

 

What I am glad he got fired for is because it seems there are many instances of him literally breaking the law, i.e. public sex, and in that case YES, it actually raises a litany of questions in regards to whether you can actually meaningfully perform your job (upholding the law) competently when you, in your private life, fetishize and straight up break it. That warrants a firing. As does his unprofessional conduct towards other elected officials, made on literal public channels/platforms (Twitter, I'm guessing?)

 

To those of you who said "how can you judge the law? You *ghasp* have sex on camera??? And are kinky???" - please find help. 

Edited by Phantom
Posted
45 minutes ago, Park Jinyoung said:

He was posting videos about jerking off on the clock, using his professional status as a draw to create sex content, having sex in public and some of y’all think he did nothing wrong :redface:

Yeah this is my take too.. him having an OF doesn’t matter too much, but his comments and actions on Twitter etc were super unprofessional.

Posted
46 minutes ago, Vespertine said:

I don't want to ~sex shame~ or whatever, but ultimately yes there is a professional line that should be followed for plenty of occupations.

 

I know this is a specific (and made up) example, but would you be comfortable with your kid's teacher at school having an OnlyFans account? Everything is very accessible and easily found online, and I wouldn't like the idea of my kid being able to find their teacher online like that. I'm sure there are other professions where this might be a question too. 

 

In this judge's case, he did have tweets that were like "maybe I could squeeze in a quickie with a lawyer during jury duty." Even if this were said just as a joke, anyone could easily use it to question his impartiality in the courtroom. 

 

I don't have anything against OF at all, but I think people who want to be on OF with their faces or other identifying markers should go into it with the knowledge and acceptance that it won't necessarily be compatible with future careers. 

I think there's a difference when you're working closely with children since obviously children shouldn't watch that and it would also be very disruptive if they find out.

When you're working with adults though I don't think there's a problem if you keep it separate enough, and yeah tweets like that fetishizing illegal stuff (misconduct?) definitely should've got him fired, not defending this guy lol.

Posted

Small dick omg

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.