~Start The Music Posted March 14, 2023 Posted March 14, 2023 Stupid twitter people and their stupid worthless opinions ***** stfu!
liver Posted March 14, 2023 Posted March 14, 2023 idgi she looks hot for once without the Ron McDonald hairstyle
Vermillion Posted March 14, 2023 Posted March 14, 2023 Just now, liver said: idgi she looks hot for once without the Ron McDonald hairstyle The exact hairstyle I remember people praising Rih for on here during the Loud era. Whatever.
CottageHore Posted March 14, 2023 Posted March 14, 2023 It’s always the insufferable twinks with not an ounce of talent, money, let alone knowledge on what goo photography is who say **** like “fire your stylist!” like wtf are you talking about? She looks good. Just say you hate women and move on
est. in 90s Posted March 14, 2023 Posted March 14, 2023 They didn't lie. The styling and poses for the photoshoot were awful and the cover was even worse
Chiidish Posted March 14, 2023 Posted March 14, 2023 It was a very very very lazy shoot. Like that’s THE it girl, possibly most it girl to ever it girl and that all y’all did I am only tolerating it because that’s the princess but they deserve lashings for this mess
liver Posted March 14, 2023 Posted March 14, 2023 1 minute ago, Espresso said: The exact hairstyle I remember people praising Rih for on here during the Loud era. Whatever. ah yeah it's the exact same hairstyle
UnusualBoy Posted March 14, 2023 Posted March 14, 2023 She does not look bad but the pics look off for some reason.
Antisocialites Posted March 14, 2023 Posted March 14, 2023 they did not lie that whole shoot was unflattering.
Vermillion Posted March 14, 2023 Posted March 14, 2023 @liver Her cherry-red hair was compared to Ronald McDonald regardless of the first photo being a more accurate representation. It isn't the same, I agree. The photoshoot's a dead-ringer for Rihanna's Loud era hair regardless but people are still complaining about it. That's my point.
BOOMBAYAH Posted March 14, 2023 Posted March 14, 2023 They’re right she looks terrible, the Azealia spread is much better
Billionaire Posted March 14, 2023 Posted March 14, 2023 I have to agree The lighting especially is a mess.
hétérosexuelle Posted March 14, 2023 Posted March 14, 2023 Love ice spice but i agree I thought the same upon seeing the pics, the photographer, stylist and makeup artist ****** up and goofed they had an opportunity to have a viral slay with the viral queen herself and messed up
MadonnasBoyfriend Posted March 14, 2023 Posted March 14, 2023 The last picture is disgusting. Why would she agree to do that ew
satellites.™ Posted March 14, 2023 Posted March 14, 2023 (edited) This is the MAGAZINES stamp, their literal style. Look at the ******* title of the magazine gen z idiots. Edited March 14, 2023 by satellites.™
SupremeGoddess Posted March 14, 2023 Posted March 14, 2023 1 hour ago, CottageHore said: It’s always the insufferable twinks with not an ounce of talent, money, let alone knowledge on what goo photography is who say **** like “fire your stylist!” like wtf are you talking about? She looks good. Just say you hate women and move on what did you get expect from a lil uzi vers with a no chill handle twitter users remain brain cell dead and living miserable lives thinking hit tweets or replies is somehow a beacon of success
ATRL Moderator madonnas Posted March 14, 2023 ATRL Moderator Posted March 14, 2023 I actually like it, but that tweet is hardly a harsh drag.
CottageHore Posted March 15, 2023 Posted March 15, 2023 15 minutes ago, SupremeGoddess said: what did you get expect from a lil uzi vers with a no chill handle twitter users remain brain cell dead and living miserable lives thinking hit tweets or replies is somehow a beacon of success I forget that app exists and then I’m reminded it’s still here every time I’m shown one of these stupid ass tweets against my will
XAMJ Posted March 15, 2023 Posted March 15, 2023 it looks more like an IG photoshoot than a magazine shoot
Recommended Posts